Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-c4bhq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-18T18:37:55.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
- English
- Français
Article contents
Only Right Makes Might? Center-Right Policy Competition Among Major Japanese Parties After Electoral Reform
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 November 2022
- Christian G. Winkler*
- Affiliation:Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Seinan Gakuin University, Fukuoka, Japan
- Naoko Taniguchi
- Affiliation:Professor, Graduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- *
- *Corresponding author. Email:winkler@seinan-gu.ac.jp
Extract
The effects of the 1990s reforms to the electoral system of Japan's House of Representatives have been among the most frequently discussed topics in political science research on the country. These reforms saw the replacement of a hitherto single nontransferable vote (SNTV) system by a mixed-member majoritarian (MMM) system with a strong Single Member District (SMD) and a weaker Proportional Representation (PR) component. Many studies have suggested that the reforms may have had significant impact on the strategies of political parties. Generally, SMD systems have been widely thought to favor larger parties, while PR systems are more beneficial to small and medium-sized parties. On the content side, larger parties seeking control of the government would try to win the support of large numbers of floating voters by campaigning on universal/programmatic policy appeals, as opposed to particularistic interests. In contrast, smaller parties would cater towards their core supporters’ preferences. Previous studies have noted that the old SNTV system in Japan had produced results similar to PR systems (Reed2003). Japan's electoral reform may have thus changed the strategy of large parties, which would need to win more seats in the SMDs to gain (or hold onto) power, while smaller parties have continued to try and win seats via the PR tier. Therefore, the reform provides valuable research material in so far as we can simultaneously observe different effects by the SMD and the PR systems on parties of different sizes.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the East Asia Institute
Access options
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
List of references
Abe,Yuki, andEndo,Masahisa.2014. “Kōmeitō's Uncertain Decades between Religion and Politics,” inKōmeitō: Politics and Religion in Japan, ed. George Ehrhardt, Axel Klein, Levi McLaughlin, and Steven Reed (Berkeley:University of California Research Monograph Series),83–109.Google Scholar
Adams,James,2012. “Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections.”Annual Review of Political Science15:401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James, Samuel Merrill, and Bernard Grofman.2005.A Unified Theory of Party Competiton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Association for Promoting Fair Elections,2015. “Dai47kai Shūgin Giin Sōsenkyo Zenkoku Ishiki Chōsa.” Available at:www.akaruisenkyo.or.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/47syuishikicyosa-1.pdf. Accessed onJuly 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Bawn,Kathleen, andThies,Michael.2003. “A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives”.Journal of Theoretical Politics15 (1):5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge,Ian, andKlingemann,Hans-Dieter.2001.Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998.Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Budge,Ian,David,Robertson, andDerek,Hearl 1987.Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calvo,Ernesto, andHellwig,Timothy.2011. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives under Different Electoral Systems.”American Journal of Political Science55 (1):27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac,Amy.2016. “From Pork to Policy: The Rise of Programmatic Campaigning in Japanese Elections.”Journal of Politics78 (1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox,Gary.1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.”American Journal of Political Science34 (4):903–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox,Gary,1997.Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems.New York:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durr,Robert.1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?.”American Political Science Review87:158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrhardt,George,Klein,Axel,McLaughlin,Levi, andReed,Stephen.2014.Kōmeitō: Politics and Religion in Japan.Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe,Margarita,2008.Welfare and Capitalism in Postwar Japan.New York:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezrow,Lawrence.2008. “Parties’ Policy Programmes and the Dog that Didn't Bark: No Evidence that Proportional Systems Promote Extreme Party Positioning.”British Journal of Political Science38:479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura,Naofumi.2015. “The Influence of Electoral Institutions on Legislative Representation: Evidence from Japan's Single Non-Transferable Vote and Single-Member District Systems.”Party Politics21 (2):209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George Mulgan,Aurelia,2005.Japan's Interventionist State: The Role of MAFF.Abingdon:Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Giannetti,Daniela, andBernard,Grofman.2011.A Natural Experiment in Electoral Law Reform: Evaluating the Long Run Consequences of 1990s Electoral Reform in Italy and Japan. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannetti,Daniela, andNaoko,Taniguchi.2011. “The Changing Bases of Party Support in Italy and Japan: Similarities and Differences.” InA Natural Experiment in Electoral Law Reform: Evaluating the Long Run Consequences of 1990s Electoral Reform in Italy and Japan, edited by Daniela Giannetti and Bernard Grofman,33–58.New York:Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker,Jacob, andPierson,Paul.2010.Winner-Take-All-Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned its Back on the Middle Class.New York:Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Haupt,Andrea.2010. “Parties’ Responses to Economic Globalization: What Is Left for the Left and Right for the Right?”Party Politics16 (1):5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoguchi,Takashi.1983. “Japan 1960–1980: Party Election Pledges.” InIdeology, Strategy and Party Change,369–387.Google Scholar
Jahn,Detlef.2011. “Conceptualizing Left and Right in Comparative Politics: Towards a Deductive Approach.”Party Politics17:745–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasuya, Yuko. 2015. “Ippyō no Kakusa o meguru Kihan Riron to Jisshō Bunseki.”Nenpō Seijigaku66:90–117.Google Scholar
Klingemann,Hans-Dieter,Hofferbert,Richard I., andBudge,Ian.1994.Parties, Policies, and Democracy.Boulder:Westview Press.Google Scholar
Klingemann,Hans-Dieter,Volkens,Andrea,Bara,Judith,Budge,Ian, andMcDonald,Michael.2006.Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990– 2003.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kobayashi,Yoshiaki.1997.Gendai nihon no seiji katei: Nihongata minshushugi no keiryō bunseki.Tokyo:Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Krauss,Ellis, andPekkanen,Robert.2010.The Rise and Fall of Japan's LDP.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
MacLachlan,Patricia.2014. “The Electoral Power of Japanese Interest Groups: An Organizational Perspective.”Journal of East Asian Studies14 (3):429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald,Michael, andBudge,Ian.2005.Elections, Parties, Democracy.Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill,Samuel, andGrofman,Bernard.1999.A Unified Theory of Voting.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori McElwain,Kenneth.2012. “The Nationalization of Japanese Elections.”Journal of East Asian Studies12 (3):323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natori,Ryōta.2002. “Senkyo Seido Kaikaku to Rieki Yūdō Seiji (Electoral system reform and pork barrel politics).”Senkyo kenkyū17:128–141.Google Scholar
Nishio,M., andIio,Jun.2004. “03 Aki, Manifesto ha kou tsukurareta.”Chūōkōron119 (5):114–125.Google Scholar
Noble,Gregory.2010. “The Decline of Particularism in Japanese Politics.”Journal of East Asian Studies10 (2):239–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble,Gregory.2016. “A Review of Series: Japanese Politics.”Social Science Japan Journal19 (1):85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel,T. J.1998.Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch,S. O.,Slapin,Jonathan, andThies,Michael.2011. “Party System Dynamics in Post-War Japan: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Electoral Pledges.”Electoral Studies30 (1):114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle,Kenneth. B.2007.Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose.New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz,George, andMacdonald,Stuart.1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting,”American Political Science Review89:93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz,George, andMacdonald,Stuart.1998. “On Attempting to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model: Sometimes the Patient Just Can't Be Helped.”Journal of Politics60:653–690.Google Scholar
Rallins,Colin.1987. “The Influence of Election Programs.” InIdeology, Strategy and Party Change, edited by Ian Budge, David Robertson and Derek Heard, 1–14.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer,Mark, andRosenbluth,Frances.1997.Japan's Political Marketplace.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reed,Steven.2003.Japanese Electoral Politics: Creating a New Party System.London:Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth,Frances, andThies,Michael.2010.Japan Transformed: Political Change and Economic Restructuring.Princeton:Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels,Richard.2007.Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scheiner,Ethan.2012. “The Electoral System and Japan's Partial Transformation: Party System Consolidation Without Policy Realignment.”Journal of East Asian Studies12 (3):351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinada,Yutaka.2010. “2009nen sōsenkyo ni okeru senkyo kōyaku.”Senkyo kenkyū26 (2):24–43.Google Scholar
Shinada,Yutaka.2012. “Kohōsha kōyaku ni yoru sekishutsu.” InRyūdōki no Nihon seiji, edited by Nobuhiro Hiwatari,51–72.Tokyo:Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Shinoda,Tomohito.2013.Contemporary Japanese Politics: Institutional Changes and Power Shifts.New York:Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson,Randolph.2001. “The Economy and Policy Mood: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics?.”American Journal of Political Science45 (3):620–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taniguchi,Masaki, andOkawa,Chihiro.2012. “Party Position Change in Japan: 2003–2009.” InGovernmental Changes and Party Political Dynamics in Korea and Japan,87–109.Tokyo:Bokutakusha.Google Scholar
Taniguchi,Masaki.2020.Gendai-Nihon no Daihyosei Minshuseiji.Tokyo:Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Taniguchi,Naoko, andWinkler,Christian G..2020. “Sekai no Naka no Nuhon no Seito Ichi.”Nenpo Seijigaku2020–1:128–151.Google Scholar
Tsutsumi,Hideki.1998. “1996nen Shūgin senkyo ni okeru kōhosha no kōyaku to tōhyō kōdō.”Senkyo Kenkyū13:89–99.Google Scholar
Tsutsumi,Hideki.2002. “Senkyo Seido Kaikaku to Kōhosha Kōyaku: Shōsenkyoku Hirei Daihyō Seido Heiritsu Dōnyū to Kōhosha no Senkyo Senryaku.”Kagawa Hōgaku22 (2):90–120.Google Scholar
Uekami,Takayoshi, andTsutsumi,Hideki.2011.Minshutō no soshiki to seisaku: Kettō kara seiken kōtai made.Tokyo:Tōyō Keizai Shinpōsha.Google Scholar
Ward,Hugh,Ezrow,Lawrence, andDorussen,Han.2011. “Globalization, Party Positions, and the Median Voter.”World Politics63 (3):509–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler,Christian G.2014. “Between Pork and People: An Analysis of the Policy Balance in the LDP's Election Platforms.”Journal of East Asian Studies14 (3):405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler,Christian G.2017. “Right On? The LDP's Drift to the Right and the Persistence of Particularism.”Social Science Japan Journal20 (2):203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
