- English
- Français
Article contents
Wild sheep and livestock in Nepal Trans-Himalaya: coexistence or competition?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 July 2008
- RINJAN SHRESTHA*
- Affiliation:Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, PO Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, NorwayWorld Wildlife Fund Nepal, PO Box 7660, Kathmandu, Nepal
- PER WEGGE
- Affiliation:Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, PO Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway
- *
- *Correspondence: Dr R. Shrestha email:rinjan@gmail.com
Summary
Excessive grazing by livestock is claimed to displace wild ungulates in the Trans-Himalaya. This study compares the seasonal diets and habitat use of sympatric wild naurPseudois nayaur and domestic goatCapra hircus, sheepOvis aries and free-ranging yakBos grunniens in north Nepal and analyses their overlap both within and across seasons. Alpine meadow and the legumesOxytropis andChesneya were critical resources for all animal groups. High overlap occurred cross-seasonally when smallstock (sheep and goats) in summer used the spring and autumn ranges of naur. Relatively high total ungulate biomass (3028 kg km−2) and low recruitment of naur (56 young per 100 adult females in autumn) suggested interspecific competition. The spatio-temporal heterogeneity in composition and phenology of food plants across the steep gradient of altitude, together with rotational grazing, appears to indirectly facilitate coexistence of naur and smallstock. However, owing to high cross-seasonal (inter-seasonal) overlaps, competition is likely to occur between these two groups at high stocking densities. Within seasons, naur overlapped more with free-ranging yak than with smallstock. As their habitat use and diets were most similar in winter, when both fed extensively on the same species of shrubs, naur was most likely to compete with yak during that season.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2008
Access options
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
- 46
- Cited by

