- English
- Français
Article contents
The Disappearance and Rediscovery of Zamzam and the ‘Well of the Ka'ba’
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
Extract
According to Muslim tradition, some time after the spring of Zamzam had been caused by God to gush forth for Hagar and Ishmael following their expulsion into the wilderness by Abraham, it disappeared. Because of the sins of the tribe of Jurhum, which until then had possessed Mecca and the control of its sanctuary (wilāyat al-bayt), Zamzam, the well of the sanctuary, dis-appeared or was hidden, and Jurhum was driven out of Mecca and lost thewilāyat al-bayt. The rediscovery of the well is associated with the grandfather of the Prophet, 'Abd al-Muttahb. At a much later, but unspecified date, we are told, he experienced a dream in which the place of Zamzam was revealed to him. From this time on the well, according to tradition, enjoyed a continuous existence, it being one of the features of the Meccan sanctuary which were taken over when Muhammad adopted the sanctuary for Islam. Zamzam, however, is not the only well associated with the Meccan sanctuary. Muslim tradition knows too of a dry pit inside the Ka'ba which is sometimes referred to as the ‘well of the Ka'ba’.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1980
Access options
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)References
1 I am grateful to Professor P. M. Holt, Mr. Michael Cook, and Dr J. Wansbrough for reading earlier versions and offering advice
2Al-Azrāqi,, Kitāb Akhbdr Makka, apudWustenfeld,F.,Die Chroniken der Stadt Meklca,I,Leipzig,1858,282 ff.Google Scholar;Hishām,Ibn,Sīra,second ed.,Cairo,1375/1955,I,142 if.Google Scholar;Sa'd,Ibn,Kitāb al-ṭabaqāt al-kabīr,Leiden,1904–1921,i/l,49 ff.Google Scholar;al-Ya'qūbi,,Tārīkh,Beirut, 1390/1970,I,246 if.Google Scholar;al-Fākihī,, Tārīkh Makka, MSLeiden, Or.463, fols. 338a ffGoogle Scholar.
3Hishām,Ibn,Sīra,I,143Google Scholar.
4Al-Azraqī,,Alchbār Malcka,284, 11. 9 ff.Google Scholar;al-Fākihī,,Tārīkh Makka,339a, 11. 17 ffGoogle Scholar.
5Al-Ya'qūbī,,Tārīkh,I,246Google Scholar (3 dreams); al-Fākihī, 338a, 11. 16 ff. (3), 338b, II. 6 ff. from foot (3), 338b, 11. 12 ff. (4).
6 Al-Azraqī, 286;Hishām,Ibn,Sīra,i,146Google Scholar; Ibn Sa'd, i/l, 50; al-Fākihī, 338, 11. 16 ff.
7 Ibn Sa'd, i/l, 49–50.
8 Al-Azraqī, 52.
8 Loc. cit.
9Hishām,Ibn,Sīra,I,111, 114Google Scholar; al-Fākihī, 339a, 1. 12.
10 AJ-Azraqī, 279 ff.
11Al-Ṭabarī,,Tārīkh,Leiden,1879–1901,I,1130 ffGoogle Scholar.
12 Al-Azraqī, 287: after finding the gazelles, 'Abd al-Muttalib places one of them above the door of the Ka'ba and the other ‘in the belly (baṭn) of the Ka'ba in the pit (jubb) which was there and into which were put the things which were brought to the Ka'ba’.
13Al-Ṭabarī,,Tārīkh,I,1132Google Scholar; so tooHishām,Ibn,Sīra,I,114Google Scholar; cf. al-Azraqī, 52, 281.
14 Al-Ṭabarī, loc. cit.; Ibn Hishām, loc. cit.
15Aspects of Muslim political and religious history in the 1st/7th century, with special reference to the development of the Muslim sanctuary, Ph.D. thesis,University of London,1978,91–6Google Scholar.
16 e.g.,Hishām,Ibn,Sīra,I,146Google Scholar; al-Ṭabarī does not have any detailed account of ‘Abd al-Muṭṭalib's discovery, but neither of his two allusions to it mentions the finding of theḥajar al-rukn (I, 1088, 1134).
17 For an attempt to establish the relationship of the different Jewish versions and the development of each, seeCollins,M. F., ‘The hidden Vessels in Samaritan tradition’, inJournal for the Study of Judaism,III,1972,97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for the tradition in Samaritanism, seeKippenberg,H. G.,Garizim und SynagogeBerlin,1971,234–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18Ginzberg,L.,The legends of the Jews,Philadelphia,1911–1938,III,48, 158, 161, iv, 24, 320–1Google Scholar; M. F. Collins, loc. cit.
19Josephus,,Antiquities,XVIII,4.i–iiGoogle Scholar;Kippenberg,H. G.,Garizim und Synagoge,113–14Google Scholar.
20 On the Taheb, seeKippenberg,H. G.,Garizim und Synagoge,276–305Google Scholar;laser,S. J.,The Dositheans,Leiden,1976, esp. pp.127–31, 140–2Google Scholar.
21MaeDonald,J.,The theology of the Samaritans,London,1964,44Google Scholar.
22MaeDonald,J. (ed.),The Samaritan chronicle no. II,Berlin,1969,114 ff., 126Google Scholar.
23Memar Marqah, ed. and tr.MaeDonald,J.,Berlin,1963,v,2 (= Eng. tr., 197)Google Scholar; see also v, 4 (= Eng. tr., 207).
24Gaster,M.,The Samaritans. Their history, doctrine and literature,London,1925,91Google Scholar;Kippenberg,H. G.,Oarizim und Synagoge,238–46Google Scholar.
25The Samaritan chronicle no. 11, 126.
26Ibid., 114. It may be relevant that Rabbinical polemic against the Samaritans accused them of knowing that golden idols were hidden on Gerizim and revering it for that reason:Collins,M. F., op. cit.,114–15Google Scholar.
27Al-Ṭabarī,,Tārīkh,I, 2856 ff.Google Scholar; Ibn Sa'd, i/2, 164–5;al-Mas'ūdi,,Tanhīh,Cairo,1938,254–5Google Scholar; G. Levi Delia Vida, ‘'Othmān b. 'Affan’, inEncyclopaedia of Islam, first edition.
28 Ibn Sa'd, i/2, 15, 131, 160–6;Hirschfeld,H.,New researches into the composition and exegesis of the Qoran,London,1902,22–4Google Scholar;Wansbrough,J.,Quranic Studies,Oxford,1977,64–5Google Scholar.
29Midrash Babba on Numbers, xv, 10;Midrash Tanḥūmā, ed.Buber,S.,Wilna,1885,IV,50Google Scholar.
30Ginzberg,L.,Legends,III,161Google Scholar.
31al-Najjār,Ibn, Dwrra, apudal-Fāsī,,Shifā’ al-gharām,Cairo,1956,341–2Google Scholar;Yāqūt,,Mu'jam al-buldān,Leipzig,1866–1873,I,430Google Scholar;Wiistenfeld,F. (tr.),Geschichte der Stadt Medina, ch. 6, § 1 (p.147)Google Scholar.
32Al-Ṭabarī,,Tārīkh,I,2856, 2858Google Scholar.
33 For an example of the difficulties involved in establishing the earliest usage of the termfitna, seeJuynboll,G. H. A., ‘The date of the great fitna’, inArabica,xx,1973,142–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34Māja,Ibn,Sunan,Cairo,1952Google Scholar,muqaddima, bāb 11 (p. 41, no. 111);Wensinck,A. J., ‘Muhammad und die Propheten’, inAda Orienttdia,II,1924,178Google Scholar.
35 See above, p. 45, n. 8a.
36Wensinck,A. J., ‘The ideas of the western Semites concerning the navel of the earth’, in Verhandelingen der Koninklijlce Akademie van Wetenschappen,Afdeeling Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks, deelXVII, 1,1916, pp.25–30Google Scholar.
37 2 Mace, 2:4–8;The Samaritan chronicle no. II, 114. According to 2 Mace, loc. cit., the cave was situated on the mountain from which Moses viewed the Promised Laud. According to theMemar Marqah. II, 12, v, 3 (= Eng. tr., 83, 206), Moses was buried in a cave on Mt. Nebo, the mountain from which he viewed the Promised Land. This association of ideas is reminiscent of the Syriac Cave of Treasures (Me'ārath Gazzē) in which Adam was buried and in which God deposited gold, frankincense and myrrh. This cave was situated immediately below Paradise, a feature which associates it with the navel of the earth circle of ideas:Bezold,C.,Die Schatzhohle,2 vols.,Leipzig,1883–1888Google Scholar;Budge,E. A. Wallis,The cave of treasures,London,1927Google Scholar;Wensinck,,Navel,27Google Scholar.
38 e.g., al-Azraqī, 169–70:kānafi'l-Ka'ba…jubb ‘amiq…fa-summiyattilka’ l-bi'ral-Akhsaf…
39 e.g.,ibid., 73 (alsofī baṭn al-Ka'ba).
40Ibid., 43.
41Ibid., 73, 170 (it was called al-Akhsaf ‘and the Arabs called it al-Akhshaf’!);Dozy,R.,Die Israditen zu Mekka,Leipzig,1864,176–7Google Scholar, attempts to derive the name from Aramaicḥasap in the sense of pot or vessel; al-Azraqī, 170, seems to want to derive it from the fact that a thief was shut up (?khusifa) by God in the pit.
42Ibid., 31, 73, 169.
43Al-Ṭabarī,,Tārīkh,I,1130fGoogle Scholar.
44 A1-Azraqī, 49, 104 ff.;'al-Razzāq,Abd,Muṣannaf,Beirut,1970 ff.,v,9103, 9105, 9106Google Scholar.
45 Al-Azraqī, 73.
46Wellhausen,J.,Reste arabischen Heideniums,third edition,Berlin,1927,103Google Scholar;Smith,W. Robertson,The religion of the Semites,second edition,London,1894,197–8, 228, 340Google Scholar;Fahd,T.,Le pantheon de Varabie centrale à la veille de I'hégire,Paris,1968,38—41Google Scholar.
47Wensinck,,Navel,29–30, 59–63Google Scholar.
48 See above, p. 51, n. 42.
49 AI-Fākihī, 337b, 1. 5 from foot;al-Fāsī,,Shifā',i,247Google Scholar; note too the speech of Khālid al-Qasrī comparing the sweet water of the caliph with the bitterwater of Abraham, when he tried to supplant Zamzam by a water source he had constructed on the orders of the caliph (al-Ṭabarī,,Tārīkh,II,1199–1200)Google Scholar.
50 Al-Fākihī, 337b.
51Sidersky,D.,Origines des legendes musulmanes,Paris,1933,50—1Google Scholar;Grünbaum,M.,Neue Beiträge zur semitischen Sagenlcunde,Leiden,1893,103Google Scholar.
52Midrash Eabba on Genesis 21:29. Ibn Ezra identifies Beer-lahoi-roi with Zamzam (Grünbaum,M.,Sagenkunde,106)Google Scholar.
53Wellhausen,J.,Reste,third edition,103Google Scholar;Smith,W. Robertson,Semites,167–8Google Scholar;Fahd,T.,Pantheon,40Google Scholar.
54 See above, p. 46, n. 11.
55 See above, p. 46, n. 14.
56 Al-Azraqī, 42–3;Hisham,Ibn,Sīra,I,196–6Google Scholar;al-Tabarī,,Tafsīr,Cairo,1954—,III,61Google Scholar.
57 Al-Azraqī, loc. cit.; of. al-Fākihī, 339a, where 'Abd al-Muṭṭalib finds three stones with inscriptions in Zamzam.
58 AI-Azraqī, 111.
59 According to al-Azraqī, 171, Muḥammad found 70,000awqiya of gold in thejubb which was in the Ka'ba at the time of thefath.
60 Al-Azraqī, 169–73.
61Ibid., 157–8; cf. al-Ya'qūbī, II, 452–3; W. Barthold, ‘Tibet’, inEncyclopaedia of Islam, first edition.