Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-9f75d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-27T16:10:38.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
- English
- Français
Article contents
From Roman to medieval Worcester: development and planning in the Anglo-Saxon city
Part of: Anglo-Saxon archaeology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
- Nigel Baker
- Affiliation:School of Geography, University of Birmingham, PO Box 363 Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Hal Dalwood
- Affiliation:Archaeology Section, Hereford & Worcester County Council, Tetbury Drive, Warndon, Worcester WR 4 9LS, UK
- Richard Holt
- Affiliation:School of History, University of Birmingham, PO Box 363, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Charles Mundy
- Affiliation:Worcester City Museums Service, Queen Elizabeth House, Trinity Street, Worcester WR1 2PW, UK
- Gary Taylor
- Affiliation:Archaeology Section, Hereford & Worcester County Council, Tetbury Drive, Warndon, Worcester WR 4 9LS, UK
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The modern plan of the west Midlands city of Worcester, like so many in England, hides a series of ancient towns under the standing streets. Archaeological and historical exploration, and the old topography that shows itself in modern plots and street lines, make possible the recovery of the early pattern.
Information
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1992
References
Baker,N.J.1980.Churches, parishes and early medieval topography, inCarver,M.O.H. (ed.),Medieval Worcester, Transactions of the Worcestershire Archaeological Society 3rd series7:31–7.Google Scholar
Baker,N.J.,Lawson,J.B.,Maxwell,R. &Smith,J.T. In press.Further work on Pride Hill, Shrewsbury,Transactions of the Shropshire Historical and Archaeological Society69.Google Scholar
Barker,P.A. (ed.).1968–9.The origins of Worcester,Transactions of the Worcestershire Archaeological Society 3rd series 2.Google Scholar
Bassett,S.R.1989.Churches in Worcester before and after the conversion of the Anglo-Saxons,Antiquaries Journal69:225–56.Google Scholar
Bolland,J.1695 [1969].Acta Sanctorum, Junii I.Antwerp.Brussels:Société des Bollandistes.Google Scholar
Burnham,B.C.1987.The morphology of Romano-British ‘small towns’,Archaeological Journal144:156–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke,H.B &Dyer,C.C..1968–9.Anglo-Saxon and early Norman Worcester: the documentary evidence, inBarker 1968–9:27–33.Google Scholar
Conzen,M.R.G.1968.The use of town plans in the study of urban history, inDyos,H.J. (ed.),The study of urban history: 113–30.Leicester:Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Conzen,M.R.G.1969.Alnwick, Northumberland, a study in town-plan analysis.Revised edition.London:Institute of British Geographers. Publication 27.Google Scholar
Darlington,R.R. (ed.)1928.The Vita Wulfstani of William of Malmesbury.London:Camden. 3rd series 40.Google Scholar
Darlington,R.R.1968. (ed.)The cartulary of Worcester Cathedral Priory.London:Pipe Roll Society. New series 38.Google Scholar
Dyson,T. &Schofield,J..1984.Saxon London, inHaslam,J. (ed.),Anglo-Saxon towns in Southern England: 285–313.Chichester:Phillimore.Google Scholar
Esmonde-Cleary,S.1987.Extramural areas of Romano-British small towns.Oxford:British Archaeological Reports. British series 169.Google Scholar
Hale,W.H. (ed.)1865.Registrum Prioratus Beatae Mariae Wigorniensis.London:Camden Society 91.Google Scholar
Sawyer,P.H.1968.Anglo-Saxon charters: an annotated list and bibliography.London:Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
Scrase,A.J.1989.Development and change in burgage plots: the example of Wells,Journal of Historical Geography15(4):349–65.Google Scholar
Symons,T.1975.Regularis Concordia: history and derivation, inParsons,D. (ed.),Tenth century studies: 37–59.London:Phillimore.Google Scholar
Urry,W.1967.Canterbury under the Angevin Kings.London:University of London. Historical study 19.Google Scholar
Whitehand,J.W.R.1987.M.R.G. Conzen and the intellectual parentage of urban morphology,Planning History Bulletin9(2):35–41.Google Scholar

