Hostname: page-component-6b88cc9666-mbxxb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-16T19:52:13.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
- English
- Français
Article contents
What's at Stake in the American Empire Debate
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2007
- DANIEL H. NEXON
- Affiliation:Georgetown University
- THOMAS WRIGHT
- Affiliation:Georgetown University
Abstract
Scholars of world politics enjoy well-developed theories of the consequences of unipolarity or hegemony, but have little to say about what happens when a state's foreign relations take on imperial properties. Empires, we argue, are characterized by rule through intermediaries and the existence of distinctive contractual relations between cores and their peripheries. These features endow them with a distinctive network-structure from those associated with unipolar and hegemonic orders. The existence of imperial relations alters the dynamics of international politics: processes of divide and rule supplant the balance-of-power mechanism; the major axis of relations shift from interstate to those among imperial authorities, local intermediaries, and other peripheral actors; and preeminent powers face special problems of legitimating their bargains across heterogeneous audiences. We conclude with some observations about the American empire debate, including that the United States is, overall, less of an imperial power than it was during the Cold War.
Information
- Type
- ARTICLES
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2007 by the American Political Science Association
Access options
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
AllenPaul C.2000.Phillip III and the Pax Hispanica.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
AllsenThomas T.1987.Mongol Imperialism: The Policies of the Grand Qan Möngke in China, Russia, and the Islamic Lands, 1251–1259.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
AxelrodRobert, andRobert O.Keohane.1993.Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate,ed.D. A.Baldwin.New York:Columbia University Press.
BacevichAndrew.2002.American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of U.S. Diplomacy.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
BarfieldThomas J.1989.The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, 221 BC to AD 1757.Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.
BarkawiTarak, andMarkLaffey.1999.“The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and Globalization.”European Journal of International Relations5(4):403–34.Google Scholar
BarkeyKaren.1994.Bandits and Bureaucrats: The Ottoman Route to State Centralization.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
BarnettMichael, andRaymondDuvall.2005.“Power in International Politics.”International Organization59(1):39–75.Google Scholar
BarrettThomas M.1995.“Lines of Uncertainty: The Frontiers of the North Caucasus.”Slavic Review54(3):578–601.Google Scholar
BaumgartnerT.,W.Buckley,etal.1975.“Relational Control: The Human Structuring of Cooperation and Conflict.”Journal of Conflict Resolution19(3):414–40.Google Scholar
BearmanPeter S.1993.North Carolina Lectures on Networks.Chapel Hill,NC.
BeissingerMark R.2002.Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
BowenH. V.2002.Perceptions from the Periphery: Colonial American Views of Brtain's Asiatic Empire, 1756–1783.Negotiated Empires: Centers and Peripheries in the Americas, 1500–1820,ed.C.Daniels andM. D.Kennedy.New York:Routledge,283–300.
BruntP. A.1965.“Reflections on British and Roman Imperialism.”Comparative Studies in Society and History7(3):267–88.Google Scholar
BurtRonald S.1992.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
ChaVictor D.2004.Power Play: Origins of the American Alliance System in Asia,Washington, DC:Georgetown University.
ChaceJames2002.“Imperial America and the Common Interest.”World Policy Journal19(1):1–9.Google Scholar
CooleyAlexander.2005.Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Nations in Transit.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
CoxMichael.2004.“Empire, Imperialism and the Bush Doctrine.”Review of International Studies30(4):585–608.Google Scholar
DanielsChristine, andMichael D.Kennedy, Eds.2002.Negotiated Empires: Centers and Peripheries in the Americas, 1500–1820.New York:Routledge.
DiamondLarry.2005.Squandered Victory: The American Occupation and the Bungled Attempt to Bring Democracy to Iraq.New York:Times Books.
DonnellyJack.2006.“Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Security.”European Journal of International Relations12(2):139–70.Google Scholar
DoyleMichael.1986.Empires.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
ElliottJ. H.1984.Richelieu and Olivares.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
FearonJames D.1998.“Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.”International Organization52(2):269–305.Google Scholar
FearonJames D., andDavid D.Laitin.2004.“Neotrusteeship and the Problem of Weak States.”International Security28(4):5–43.Google Scholar
FreemanLinton C.1977.“A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweeness.”Sociometry40(1):35–41.Google Scholar
GaltungJohan.1971.“A Structural Theory of Imperialism.”Journal of Peace Research8(2):81–117.Google Scholar
GilpinRobert.1981.War and Change in World Politics.New York:Cambridge University Press.
GoddardStacie E.2006.“Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimation.”International Organization60,(1):35–68.Google Scholar
GouldRoger V.1993.“Collective Action and Network Structure.”American Sociological Review58(2):182–96.Google Scholar
GouldRoger V., andRoberto M.Fernandez.1989.“Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks.”Sociological Methodology19:89–126.Google Scholar
HagerRobert P.Jr., andDavid A.Lake.2000.“Balancing Empires: Competitive Decolonization in International Politics.”Security Studies9(3):108–48.Google Scholar
HalperinCharles J.1983.“Russia and the Mongol Empire in Comparative Perspective.”Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies43(1):239–61.Google Scholar
HemmerChristopher J., andPeter J.Katzenstein.2002.“Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism.”International Organization56(3):575–607.Google Scholar
HobsonJohn M., andJ. C.Sharman.2005.“The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.”European Journal of International Relations11(1):63–98.Google Scholar
HoweStephen.2002.Empire, A Very Short Introduction:Oxford:Oxford University Press.
HuiVictoria Tin-bor.2005.War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
HulsmanJohn C., andAlexis Y.Debat.2006.“In Praise of Warlords.”The National Interest(84):51–58.Google Scholar
HurrellAndrew.2005.“Pax Americana or the Empire of Insecurity?”International Relations of the Asia-Pacific5(2):153–76.Google Scholar
IkenberryG. John.2001.After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major War.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
IkenberryG. John.2002.Introduction.America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power,ed.G. J.Ikenberry.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press,1–26.
IsaacBenjamin.1992.The Limits of Empire: The Roman Army in the East.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
IsraelJonathan.1995.The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477–1806.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
JacksonPatrick T., andDanielNexon.2001.“Whence Causal Mechanisms? A Comment on Legro.”Dialogue-IO1(1):1–21.http://journals.cambridge.org/action/display/Fulltext?type=1&fid=149074&jid=&volumeId=&issueId&aid=14907.Google Scholar
JamesHarold,2006.The Roman Predicament.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
JohnsonChalmers A.2000.Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire.New York:Metropolitan Books.
KaganKimberly.2002.Hegemony, Not Empire: How the Pax Americana Differs From the Pax Romana.The Weekly Standard.7:16–17.Google Scholar
KarshEfraim, andInariKarsh.1999.Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East, 1789–1923.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
KatzensteinPeter J., andRobert O.Keohane.2006.“Varieties of Anti-Americanism: A Framework for Analysis.”Anti-americanisms in World Politics,ed.P. J.Katzenstein andR. I.Keohane.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press,9–38.
KennedyPaul.1987.The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000.New York:Random House.
KeohaneRobert O., andJoseph S.NyeJr.,1989.Power and Interdependence.New York:HarperCollins.
KingCharles.2003.“Crisis in the Caucasus: A New Look at Russia's Chechen Impasse.”Foreign Affairs82(2):134–39.Google Scholar
KoenigsbergerH. G.1955.“The Organization of Revolutionary Parties in France and the Netherlands During the Sixteenth Century.”Journal of Modern History27(4):333–51.Google Scholar
KoenigsbergerH. G., andGeorge L.Mosse.1968.Europe in the Sixteenth Century.London:Longmans, Green and Co.
KupchanCharles.1996.The Vulnerability of Empire.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
LakeDavid A.1996.“Anarchy, Hierarchy and the Variety of International Relations.”International Organization50(1):1–33.Google Scholar
LakeDavid A.2003.“The New Sovereignty in International Relations.”International Studies Review5(3):303–24.Google Scholar
LalDeepak.2004.In Praise of Empires: Globalization and Order.New York:Palgrave.
LangeMatthew.2003.“Structural Holes and Structural Synergies: A Comparative-Historical Analysis of State-Society Relations and Development in Colonial Sierra Leone and Mauritius.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology44(4):372–407.Google Scholar
LapidJoseph, andFriedrichKratochwil.1996.“Revisiting the ‘National’: Towards an Identity Agenda in Neorealism?”The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory,ed.J.Lapid andF.Kratochwil.Boulder, CO:Lynne Reinner;105–28.
LayneChristopher.1997.“From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy.”International Security22(1):86–124.Google Scholar
LefeverErnest W.1999.America's Imperial Burden: Is the Past Prologue?Boulder, CO:Westview.
LemkeDouglas.2002.Regions of War and Peace.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
LendonJ. E.1997.Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
LenmanBruce.2001.Britain's Colonial Wars 1688–1783.London:Longman.
LievenDominic.2000.Empire: The Russian Empire and its Rivals.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
LouisWilliam Roger.1978.Imperialism at Bay: The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire 1941–1945.New York:Oxford University Press.
LuttwakEdward N.1976.The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire: From the First Century A.D. to the Third.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
LynchJohn.1991.Spain 1516–1598: From Nation-State to World Empire.Oxford:Blackwell.
MacDonaldPaul K.2004.Peripheral Pulls: Great Power Expansion and Lessons for the “American Empire.”Presented at the Conference of the International Studies Association, Montreal.
MachiavelliNiccòlo.1994.Selected Political Writings.Cambridge,Hackett.
MamdaniMahmood.1996.Citizen and Subject.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
MastandunoMichael.2005.“Hegemonic Order, September 11, and the Consequences of the Bush Revolution.”International Relations of the Asia-Pacific5(2):177–96.Google Scholar
MontgomeryAlexander H.2005.“Proliferation Determinism or Pragmatism? How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb Network.”International Security30(2).Google Scholar
MotylAlexander J.1999.Revolutions, Nations, Empires: Conceptual Limits and Theoretical Possibilities.New York:Columbia University Press.
MotylAlexander J.2001.Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires.New York:Columbia University Press.
MotylAlexander J.2006.“Is Everything Empire? Is Empire Everything?”Comparative Politics38(2):229–49.Google Scholar
NationR. Craig.1992.Black Earth, Red Star: A History of Soviet Security Policy, 1917–1991.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
NewburyColin.2003.Patrons, Clients, and Empire: Chieftancy and Over-rule in Asia, Africa, and the Pacific.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
NexonDaniel.2006.Religion, European identity, and political contention in historical perspective.Religion in an Expanding Europe,ed.T. A.Byrnes andP. J.Katzenstein.Cambridge,Cambridge University Press,256–82.
OstrogorskiGeorge.1969.History of the Byzantine State.New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
PadgettJohn F., andChristopher K.Ansell.1993.“Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.”American Journal of Sociology98(6):1259–1319.Google Scholar
PagdenAnthony.2001.Peoples and Empires: a Short History of European Migration, Exploration, and Conquest, from Greece to the Present.New York,Modern Library.
PaulT. V.2005.“Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy.”International Security30(1):46–71.Google Scholar
PeattieMark R.1984a.Introduction.The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945,ed.R. H.Myers andM. R.Peattie.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press,3–60.
PeattieMark R.1984b.“The Nan'yo: Japan in the South Pacific, 1885–1945.”The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945,ed.R. H.Myers andM. R.Peattie.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press,172–212.
PérezJoseph.1970.La revolution des Comunidades de Castille, 1520–1521.Bordeaux, Bibliothèque de l'École des Hautes Études Hispaniques.
PhilpottDaniel.2001.Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
PollisAdmantia.1973.“Intergroup Conflict and British Colonial Policy: The Case of Cyprus.”Comparative Politics39(3):289–95.Google Scholar
Reus-SmitChristian.1997.“Constructing Anarchy: The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions.”International Organization51(4):555–89.Google Scholar
RingerFritz.1997.Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
RosenStephen Peter.2003.“An Empire, If You Can Keep It.”The National Interest(71):51–62.Google Scholar
SchmittEric, andMarkLandler.2004.Cheney Calls for More Unity in Fight Against Terrorism.New York Times.September25:10.Google Scholar
SchwellerRandall L.2001.“The Problem of International Order Revisited: A Review Essay.”International Security26(1):161–86.Google Scholar
SimmelGeorg.1971.On Individuality and Social Forms.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
SnyderJack.1991.Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
SpruytHendrik.1994.The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
SpruytHendrik.2005.Ending Empire: Contested Sovereignty and Territorial Partition.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
StevensonWilliam B., andDannaGreenberg.2000.“Agency and Social Networks: Strategies of Action in a Social Structure of Position, Opposition, and Opportunity.”Administrative Science Quarterly45(4):651–78.Google Scholar
te BrakeWayne.1998.Shaping History: Ordinary People in European Politics, 1500–1700.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
TillyCharles.1978.Mobilization to Revolution.New York:Addison-Wesley.
TillyCharles.1997.How Empires End.After Empire: Multiethnic Societies and Nation-Building,ed.K.Barkey andM.von Hagen.Boulder, CO:Westview,1–11.
TillyCharles.2002.Stories, Identities, and Political Change.New York:Rowman & Littlefield.
TillyCharles.2003.The Politics of Collective Violence.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
WaltzKenneth.1979.Theory of International Politics.New York:Addison-Wesley.
WaltzKenneth.2000.Structural Realism After the Cold War.International Security.25:5–41.Google Scholar
Ward-PerkinsBryan.2005.The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilization.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
WatsonAdam.1992.The Evolution of International Society.New York:Routledge.
WeberKatja.1997.“Hierarchy amidst Anarchy: A Transaction Costs Approach to International Security Cooperation.”International Studies Quarterly41(2):321–40.Google Scholar
WellmanBarry.1983.“Network Analysis: Some Basic Principles.”Sociological Theory1:155–200.Google Scholar
WellmanBarry, andStephenBerkowitz, eds.1998.Social Structures: A Network Approach.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
WendtAlexander.1994.“Collective Identity Formation and the International State.”American Political Science Review88(2):384–97.Google Scholar
WendtAlexander, andDanielFriedheim.1995.“Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State.”International Organization49(4):689–721.Google Scholar
WhiteHarrison C.1972.Do Networks Matter? Notes for Camden.Cambridge, MA:26.
WhiteHarrison C.,Scott A.Boorman,etal.1976.“Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions.”American Journal of Sociology81(4):730–80.Google Scholar
WohlforthWilliam C.1999.“The Stability of a Unipolar World.”International Security24(1):5–41.Google Scholar
ZagorinPerez.1982.Rulers and Rebels, 1500–1600. Volume II: Provincial Rebellion, Revolutionary Civil Wars, 1560–1660.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- 167
- Cited by
