Hostname: page-component-6b88cc9666-l84z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-16T18:57:54.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Origin of the Term International Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 April 2017

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Current Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 In hisIntroduction to the Study of International Organization, published in 1922, the writer said (p. 3) that the new phrase had come into common speech in the preceding twenty five years. This was somewhat of an exaggeration although the usage grew rapidly in the years 1920-1922 and immediately thereafter.

2 Reinsch, P. S.,Public International Unions, 1911, pp. 2 and 4.

3 P. 10.

4 Die Friedens-Warte, May, 1910, p. 84, col. 1. For much of the material in this note, specifically the reference to Lorimer, below, I am indebted to my friend and former colleague Professor Hans Wehberg, scholarly and indefatigable editor ofFriedens-Warte now since many years.

5 Same, col. 2.

6 P. 81.

7 P. 89.

8Die Zukunft, edited by Maximilian Harden, August 17, 1907, cited in correspondence by Wehberg.

9 In French inRevue Generale de Droit Internationale Publique, Vol. XV (1908), p. 1, and in German inStaatsrechtliche Abhandlungen, Festgabe für Paul Laband, Tubingen, 1908, p. 535; the German version is greatly expanded in comparison with the French although they are obviously more or less the same paper.

10Juristische Bläitter, publication of theJuristiche Gesellschaft zu Wien, Vol. 36, No. 44 (Nov. 4, 1907), p. 521. For this reference I am indebted to my friend and former colleague Professor Kelsen, sometime member of theJuristiche Gesellschaft.

11 Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. XXIV (1867), p. 557, cited in Jacob ter Meulen,Der Gedanke der Internationalen Organisation, 1917-1940, Vol. II, Pt. 2, p. 207, note 2. On Lorimer's position in the field of international law and organization in general see Jenks, C.W., “The Significance today of Lorimer's Ultimate Problem of International Jurisprudence,” in Grotius Society,Transactions, Vol. 26 (1940), p. 35.

12 Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée, Vol. III (1871), p. 1, at p. 4.

13 Thomas Willing Balch, International Courts of Arbitration, 1912 (fourth edition), pp. 31, 41.

14The Institutes of the Law of Nations, Vol. II, 1884, pp. 190, 216, etc.

15 Under the titlePrinciples de Droit International; published also in Paris.

16 Lorimer's phrase was frequently used by Constantin Franz in 1878-82(Fdderalismusals . . .Prinzip für … Internationale Organization, 1879): ter Meulen, Vol. II, Pt. 2, p. 15, and correspondence with Dr. Laslo Ledermann, Geneva.

17 Lorimer even proposed “International Government“: work cited, p. 279.