Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

An Analytical Study on the Efficacy of Blockchain Frameworks for Student Grievance Management

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Student grievance redressal is an essential indicator of institutional effectiveness and education quality, that ensures a conducive academic environment. Every educational institute provides a 24 × 7 web or mobile platform for students to register their grievances. However, these centralized solutions often lack transparency, exhibit potential biases, and also raise security and privacy concerns that lead to student reluctance to use them. A blockchain-based grievance redressal system can address these issues by providing transparency, immutability, privacy, accountability, and auditability. However, selecting the most suitable blockchain framework is challenging and a tedious task. So, we analyzed the existing studies on performance analysis of blockchain frameworks and existing studies on grievance redressal. The finding from the reviewed studies indicates that 81% of the studies diverged towards Hyperledger fabric and Hyperledger fabric outperforms other frameworks in performance based on key parameters such as transactional throughput and latency. The consensus mechanism selection also significantly impacts the performance of a blockchain framework. RAFT is more efficient than the Kafka and solo consensus mechanism for Hyperledger fabric, in both low and high transaction volumes for read and write operations at various transfer rates. Hyperledger fabric achieves a 94.6% success rate in multiple operations with RAFT consensus as compared to 72.7% with Kafka. The success rate of Hyperledger fabric is reached to 96%, 98.4%, and 96.6% at 25tps, 50tps, and 100tps respectively for write operations whereas during the read operations, it is reached to 99.6. It is also found that the success rate is increased to 99.12% in dual channel network for write operation at varying transfer rates. This study suggests that Hyperledger Fabric is more effective for implementing a blockchain-based student grievance redressal system.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

This study is based on a comparative analysis and primarily depends on a review of past published studies in similar areas. This study does not use any published dataset for presenting results. The results produced in this work are unique.

References

  1. Tripathi UN, Srivastava AK, Singh BP. Effectiveness of online grievance redressal and management system: a case study of IGNOU learners. Indian J Educ Technol. 2021;3:92.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Prajapat, V. Sabharwal, V. Wadhwani. A prototype for grievance redressal system. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advancement on Computer and Communication: ICRAC 2017; 2018. pp. 41–49

  3. Ogbonnaya C, Dhir A, Maxwell-Cole A, Gorny T. Cost-cutting actions, employment relations and workplace grievances: lessons from the 2008 financial crisis. J Bus Res. 2008;152(2022):265–75.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Aravindhan, K. Periyakaruppan, K. Aswini, S. Vaishnavi, L. Yamini. Web portal for effective student grievance support system. In: 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS); 2020. pp. 1463–1465

  5. K. Sharma, R.M. Gomathi, Y.I. Imtiaz. A centralised portal for a student support system based on web application. In: 2022 6th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI); 2022. pp. 74–81

  6. Kumar A, Tiwari AA, Singh RK, Nag T. Does e-service quality of online grievance redress portals lead to satisfaction? An outlook from the perspectives of Indian youth. J Public Aff. 2023;23:e2822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hart DJ, Coates NF. International student complaint behaviour: how do East Asian students complain to their university? J Furth High Educ. 2010;34:303–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Dasgupta, A. Mukherjee. Survey of 500 women finds 1 in 10 had been sexually assaulted in higher education institutions, (2020).https://thewire.in/women/sexual-assault-higher-education-institution. Accessed 20 Aug 2023

  9. M. Chachra. 70% working women do not report workplace sexual harassment in India, India Spend (2017).https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/70-working-women-do-not-report-workplace-sexual-harassment-in-india-117030400227_1.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2023

  10. D.K. Magner. Mid-semester removal of professor roils University of Montana. Chron High Educ (1995) A25

  11. Miklas EJ, Kleiner BH. New developments concerning academic grievances. Manag Res News. 2003;26:141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pavithra K M. The National Crime Record Bureau’s report, (2023).https://factly.in/data-student-suicides-increased-by-more-than-30-between-2017-and-2021/. Accessed 18 Jul 2023

  13. Pavithra K M. Increase in suicide cases in educational institutions, New Delhi, 2023.https://pqals.nic.in/annex/1711/AS456.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2023

  14. M.R. Joshi. UGC guidelines (Redressal of grievances of students) regulations, 2023, Government of India Press (2023) 1–13.https://www.ugc.gov.in/pdfnews/4675881_Regulation.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2024

  15. P. Kormpho, P. Liawsomboon, N. Phongoen, S. Pongpaichet. Smart complaint management system. In: 2018 Seventh ICT International Student Project Conference (ICT-ISPC); 2018. pp. 1–6

  16. Palanissamy A, Kesavamoorthy R. Automated dispute resolution system (ADRS)–a proposed initial framework for digital justice in online consumer transactions in india. Procedia Comput Sci. 2019;165:224–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W.M.W. Musa, A.A. Aziz, N. Misnan, S.M.A. Manaf, e-Justice: students’ complaints made easy. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research (SEARCH) (2021) 1.https://fslmjournals.taylors.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/SEARCH/SEARCH-2021-Special-Issue-GRACE2020/SEARCH-2021-Special-Issue-GRACE2020.pdf#page=10. Accessed 23 Jun 2023

  18. S. Jha, P. Sonawane. Smart student grievance redressal system with foul language detection. In: 2022 8th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS); 2022. pp. 187–192

  19. S. Kuhan, L.K.J. Grace. Design and implementation of students grievance and database. In: 2023 2nd International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC); 2023. pp. 1065–1068

  20. P. De Filippi, S. Hassan. Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: from code is law to law is code. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1801.02507 (2018)

  21. Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H-N, Chen X, Wang H. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Int J Web Grid Serv. 2018;14:352–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Thakkar, S. Nathan, B. Viswanathan. Performance benchmarking and optimizing hyperledger fabric blockchain platform. In: 2018 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS); 2018. pp. 264–276

  23. Andoni M, Robu V, Flynn D, Abram S, Geach D, Jenkins D, McCallum P, Peacock A. Blockchain technology in the energy sector: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;100:143–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaushal RK, Kumar N, Panda SN. Blockchain technology, its applications and open research challenges. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1950/1/012030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Rani, K. Guleria, S.N. Panda. Blockchain technology novel prospective for cloud security. In: 2022 10th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO); 2022. pp. 1–6

  26. D. Yaga, P. Mell, N. Roby, K. Scarfone. Blockchain technology overview. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1906.11078 (2019)

  27. Kaur A, Singh G, Kukreja V, Sharma S, Singh S, Yoon B. Adaptation of IoT with blockchain in food supply chain management: an analysis-based review in development, benefits and potential applications. Sensors. 2022;22:8174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ratta P, Kaur A, Sharma S, Shabaz M, Dhiman G. Application of blockchain and internet of things in healthcare and medical sector: applications, challenges, and future perspectives. J Food Qual. 2021;2021:7608296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bakos Y, Halaburda H. Permissioned vs permissionless blockchain platforms: tradeoffs in trust and performance. NYU Stern Sch Bus Work Pap. 2021.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3789425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Kumar, R.K. Kaushal, N. Kumar, P.K. Malik. Comprehensive analysis of blockchain frameworks and their usability in various applications. In: Convergence of Blockchain and Internet of Things in Healthcare, CRC Press; 2024. pp. 243–262

  31. W. Yao, J. Ye, R. Murimi, G. Wang. A survey on consortium blockchain consensus mechanisms. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2102.12058 (2021)

  32. Morkunas VJ, Paschen J, Boon E. How blockchain technologies impact your business model. Bus Horiz. 2019;62:295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Samuel CN, Glock S, Verdier F, Guitton-Ouhamou P. Choice of ethereum clients for private blockchain: assessment from proof of authority perspective. IEEE Int Conf Blockchain Cryptocurrency (ICBC). 2021;2021:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dabbagh M, Choo K-KR, Beheshti A, Tahir M, Safa NS. A survey of empirical performance evaluation of permissioned blockchain platforms: challenges and opportunities. Comput Secur. 2021;100:102078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Agbo CC, Mahmoud QH. Comparison of blockchain frameworks for healthcare applications. Internet Technol Lett. 2019;2:e122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. C. Cachin. Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric. In: Workshop on Distributed Cryptocurrencies and Consensus Ledgers; 2016. pp. 1–4

  37. Saraf C, Sabadra S. Blockchain platforms: a compendium. IEEE Int Conf Innov Res Dev (ICIRD). 2018;2018:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Valenta M, Sandner P. Comparison of ethereum, hyperledger fabric and corda. Frankfurt School Blockchain Center. 2017;8:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Benji, M. Sindhu. A study on the Corda and Ripple blockchain platforms. In: Advances in Big Data and Cloud Computing: Proceedings of ICBDCC18; 2019. pp. 179–187

  40. Hearn M, Brown RG. Corda: a distributed ledger. Corda Tech White Pap. 2016;2016:6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mazzoni M, Corradi A, Di Nicola V. Performance evaluation of permissioned blockchains for financial applications: the ConsenSys Quorum case study. Blockchain Res Appl. 2022;3:100026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Syed TA, Alzahrani A, Jan S, Siddiqui MS, Nadeem A, Alghamdi T. A comparative analysis of blockchain architecture and its applications: problems and recommendations. IEEE Access. 2019;7:176838–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hassija V, Patel A, Chamola V. Police fir registration and tracking using consortium blockchain. In: Advances in Machine Learning and Computational Intelligence: Proceedings of ICMLCI 2019; 2021. pp. 785–794

  44. Zou S, Xi J, Wang S, Lu Y, Xu G. Reportcoin: a novel blockchain-based incentive anonymous reporting system. IEEE Access. 2019;7:65544–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hingorani I, Khara R, Pomendkar D, Raul N. Police complaint management system using blockchain technology. In: 2020 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS); 2020. pp. 1214–1219

  46. Jattan S, Kumar V, Akhilesh R, Naik RR, Sneha NS. Smart complaint redressal system using ethereum blockchain. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER); 2020. pp. 224–229

  47. Shettigar R, Dalvi N, Ingale K, Ansari F, Maheshwar RC. Blockchain-based grievance management system. Evol Comput Intell Front Intell Comput: Theor Appl. 2021;1:211–22.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rahman M, Azam MM, Chowdhury FS. An anonymity and interaction supported complaint platform based on blockchain technology for national and social welfare. In: 2021 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Information Technology (ICECIT); 2021. pp. 1–8

  49. Rahman M, Azam M, Chowdhury FS. Secure complaint management system against women harassment at workplace using blockchain technology. Int J Electr Comput Eng Syst. 2022;13:209–17.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Uddin KMM, Mahamuda S, Al Shahriar SS, Uddin MA. Blockchain and IFPS based secure system for managing e-FIR. Int J Inform Eng Electron Bus. 2023;14:29.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Agarwal S, Jain S, Singh V, Singh G. FIR registration system using blockchain. In: 2023 International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Technology and Networking (CICTN); 2023. pp. 426–430

  52. Mistry TS, Gor BB, Shukla RK, Sharma R. Easy-to-use first information report (FIR) system using blockchain. In: 2024 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Data Communication Technologies and Internet of Things (IDCIoT); 2024. pp. 1655–1660

  53. Kaushal RK, Kumar N, Flammini F. Enhancing data integrity in higher education: a blockchain-based student complaint system using Hyperledger fabric. Int J Comput Digit Syst. 2024;16:1387–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pongnumkul S, Siripanpornchana C, Thajchayapong S. Performance analysis of private blockchain platforms in varying workloads. In: 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN); 2017. pp. 1–6

  55. Dinh TTA, Wang J, Chen G, Liu R, Ooi BC, Tan KL. Blockbench: a framework for analyzing private blockchains. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data; 2017. pp. 1085–1100

  56. Hao Y, Li Y, Dong X, Fang L, Chen P. Performance analysis of consensus algorithm in private blockchain. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings 2018-June; 2018. pp. 280–285.https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500557

  57. Rouhani S, Deters R. Performance analysis of ethereum transactions in private blockchain. In: 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS); 2017. pp. 70–74

  58. Nasir Q, Qasse IA, Talib MA, Nassif AB. Performance analysis of hyperledger fabric platforms. Secur Commun Net. 2018;2018:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dabbagh M, Kakavand M, Tahir M, Amphawan A. Performance analysis of blockchain platforms: empirical evaluation of hyperledger fabric and ethereum. In: 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Engineering and Technology (IICAIET); 2020. pp. 1–6

  60. Kuzlu M, Pipattanasomporn M, Gurses L, Rahman S. Performance analysis of a hyperledger fabric blockchain framework: throughput, latency and scalability. IEEE Int Conf Blockchain (Blockchain). 2019;2019:536–40.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rasolroveicy M, Fokaefs M. Performance evaluation of distributed ledger technologies for IoT data registry : a comparative study. In: 2020 Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4); 2020. pp. 137–144. 10.1109/WorldS450073.2020.9210358

  62. Monrat AA, Schelén O, Andersson K. Performance evaluation of permissioned blockchain platforms. IEEE Asia-Pacific Conf Comput Sci Data Eng (CSDE). 2020;2020:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Abhishek PM, Narayan DG, Altaf H, Somashekar P. Performance evaluation of ethereum and hyperledger fabric blockchain platforms. In: 2022 13th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT); 2022. pp. 1–5

  64. Pradhan NR, Singh AP, Verma S, Kaur N, Roy DS, Shafi J, Wozniak M, Ijaz MF. A novel blockchain-based healthcare system design and performance benchmarking on a multi-hosted testbed. Sensors. 2022;22:3449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kaushal RK, Kumar N. Blockchain implementation with Hyperledger fabric and approach for performance evaluation. IEEE Int Conf Blockchain Distrib Syst Secur (ICBDS). 2023;2023:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Diaz Á, Kaschel H. Scalable electronic health record management system using a dual-channel blockchain hyperledger fabric. Systems. 2023;11:346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ucbas Y, Eleyan A, Hammoudeh M, Alohaly M. Performance and scalability analysis of ethereum and hyperledger fabric. IEEE Access. 2023;11:67156–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Capocasale V, Gotta D, Perboli G. Comparative analysis of permissioned blockchain frameworks for industrial applications. Blockchain Res Appl. 2023;4:100113.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BCRA.2022.100113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Gorenflo C, Lee S, Golab L, Keshav S. FastFabric: scaling hyperledger fabric to 20 000 transactions per second. Int J Network Manag. 2020;30:e2099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sousa J, Bessani A, Vukolic M. A byzantine fault-tolerant ordering service for the hyperledger fabric blockchain platform. In: 2018 48th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN); 2018. pp. 51–58

  71. Baliga A, Subhod I, Kamat P, Chatterjee S. Performance evaluation of the quorum blockchain platform. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1809.03421. 2018

  72. Sharma A, Schuhknecht FM, Agrawal D, Dittrich J. Blurring the lines between blockchains and database systems: the case of hyperledger fabric. In: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data; 2019. pp. 105–122

  73. Shalaby S, Abdellatif AA, Al-Ali A, Mohamed A, Erbad A, Guizani M. Performance evaluation of hyperledger fabric. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Informatics, IoT, and Enabling Technologies (ICIoT); 2020. pp. 608–613

  74. Sukhwani H, Wang N, Trivedi KS, Rindos A. Performance modeling of hyperledger fabric (permissioned blockchain network). In: 2018 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA); 2018. pp. 1–8

  75. Ampel B, Patton M, Chen H. Performance modeling of hyperledger sawtooth blockchain. IEEE Int Conf Intell Secur Inform (ISI). 2019;2019:59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sund T, Lööf C, Nadjm-Tehrani S, Asplund M. Blockchain-based event processing in supply chains—a case study at IKEA. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2020;65:101971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Corso A. Performance analysis of proof-of-elapsed-time (poet) consensus in the sawtooth blockchain framework. Eugene: University of Oregon; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Benahmed S, Pidikseev I, Hussain R, Lee J, Kazmi SMA, Oracevic A, Hussain F. A comparative analysis of distributed ledger technologies for smart contract development. IEEE 30th Ann Int Symp Pers Indoor Mobile Radio Commun (PIMRC). 2019;2019:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Nakaike T, Zhang Q, Ueda Y, Inagaki T, Ohara M. Hyperledger fabric performance characterization and optimization using goleveldb benchmark. IEEE Int Conf Blockchain Cryptocurrency (ICBC). 2020;2020:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wang C, Chu X, Performance characterization and bottleneck analysis of hyperledger fabric. In: 2020 IEEE 40th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS); 2020. pp. 1281–1286

  81. Shi Z, Zhou H, Hu Y, Jayachander S, de Laat C, Zhao Z. Operating permissioned blockchain in clouds: a performance study of hyperledger sawtooth. In: 2019 18th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing (ISPDC); 2019. pp. 50–57

  82. Guggenberger T, Sedlmeir J, Fridgen G, Luckow A. An in-depth investigation of the performance characteristics of Hyperledger Fabric. Comput Ind Eng. 2022;173:108716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Kwon M,Yu H. Performance improvement of ordering and endorsement phase in hyperledger fabric. In: 2019 Sixth International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS); 2019. pp. 428–432

  84. Sedlmeir J, Ross P, Luckow A, Lockl J, Miehle D, Fridgen G. The DLPS: a new framework for benchmarking blockchains. In: 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2021

  85. Capocasale V, Gotta D, Musso S, Perboli G. A Blockchain, 5G and IoT-based transaction management system for Smart Logistics: an Hyperledger framework. In: 2021 IEEE 45th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC); 2021. pp. 1285–1290

  86. Firdaus M, A review of performance analyzing on public and private blockchain platforms. 2020.https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/3fdmw

  87. Shilpi G, Kumar KR, Naveen K, Anshul V. Effective tools and technologies for IoT and blockchain-based remote patient monitoring: a comparative analysis. SN Comput Sci. 2023;4:844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work is not supported by any funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India

    Harish Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Kaushal & Naveen Kumar

  2. Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

    Anshul Verma

Authors
  1. Harish Kumar

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajesh Kumar Kaushal

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naveen Kumar

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anshul Verma

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRajesh Kumar Kaushal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human and/or Animal Participants

The authors of this article have not performed any studies with human subjects and animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, H., Kaushal, R.K., Kumar, N.et al. An Analytical Study on the Efficacy of Blockchain Frameworks for Student Grievance Management.SN COMPUT. SCI.5, 1071 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03378-z

Download citation

Keywords

Associated Content

Part of a collection:

Research Advancements in Intelligent Computing

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp