Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Research on detector signal receiving network layout optimization model

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fracturing surface micro-seismic monitoring technology is widely used in fracturing surface. Micro- seismic monitoring conducted by means of the internet is composed of a large number of geophones laid on the ground to collect subsurface micro seismic signals and monitor fracturing fractures. With the advantages of a large amount of monitoring data, flexible layout, easy adjustment, and low cost. The technology also has some disadvantages, such as weak signal reception, vulnerable to environmental impact and low signal-to-noise ratio. In order to improve the positioning accuracy and receive as many effective signals as possible, a signal receiving network model of optimal geophone for micro-seismic monitoring on a fractured surface based on improved genetic algorithm is proposed. Through simulation and numerical analysis, the solution model has been optimized to meet the accuracy and quickly solve the optimal geophone array scheme. The results show that the optimal geophone array scheme not only satisfies the positioning accuracy but also achieves better reception of micro-seismic signals as possible with a small number of geophones, which reduces the cost and promotes the industrial application of this technology.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duncan PM, Eisner L (2010) Reservoir characterization using surface microseismic monitoring. Geophysics 75(5):75A139–75A146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ge M (2005) Efficient mine microseismic monitoring. Int J Coal Geol 64(1–2):44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grechka V (2015) Tilted TI models in surface microseismic monitoring. Geophysics 80(6):WC11–WC23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Staněk F, Eisner L, Jan Moser T (2014) Stability of source mechanisms inverted from P-wave amplitude microseismic monitoring data acquired at the surface. Geophys Prospect 62(3):475–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang H, Zou J (2019) Dynamic evaluation of drilling leakage risk based on fuzzy theory and PSO-SVR algorithm. Futur Gener Comput Syst 95:454–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kushnir A, Varypaev A, Dricker I, Rozhkov M, Rozhkov N (2014) Passive surface microseismic monitoring as a statistical problem: Location of weak microseismic signals in the presence of strongly correlated noise. Geophys Prospect 62(4):819–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lagos SR, Velis DR (2018) Microseismic event location using global optimization algorithms: An integrated and automated workflow. J Appl Geophys 149:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang H, Wang Z, Zeng X, Lü H, Zhou X, Chen Z (2016) Velocity model optimization for surface microseismic monitoring via amplitude stacking. J Appl Geophys 135:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tramelli A, Troise C, De Natale G, Orazi M (2013) A new method for optimization and testing of Microseismic networks: An application to Campi Flegrei (Southern Italy). Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(3):1679–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kraft T, Mignan A, Giardini D (2013) Optimization of a large-scale microseismic monitoring network in northern switzerland. Geophys J Int 195(1):474–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song H, Huang X, Lou Y (2011) Study on the effect of fracture characteristics to ultra-low permeability reservoirs development. Proc 2nd Int Conf Mechanic Automat Control Eng 3559-3562

  12. Yang K, Torres-Verdín C, Yılmaz AE (Aug. 2015) Detection and quantification of three-dimensional hydraulic fractures with horizontal borehole resistivity measurements. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(8):4605–4615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wasantha PLP, Konietzky H, Xu C (2019) Effect of in-situ stress contrast on fracture containment during single- and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. Eng Fract Mech 205:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang H, Zou J (2019) An Sand Plug of Fracturing Intelligent Early Warning Model Embedded in Remote Monitoring System. IEEE ACCESS 7:47944–47954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Witten B, Shragge J (2017) Image-domain velocity inversion and event location for microseismic monitoring. Geophysics 82(5):KS71–KS83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothert E, Shapiro SA (2003) Microseismic monitoring of borehole fluid injections: Data modeling and inversion for hydraulic properties of rocks. Geophysics 68(2):685–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. (2012) Generation of low-frequency radiation by dense hot plasma under pondermotive action of a short laser pulse. J Exp Theor Phys 114(5):878–891

  18. Torío P, Sánchez MG (2005) Novel procedure to determine statistical functions of impulsive noise. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 47(3):559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li FQ, Zhao XT (2013) Study of Rock Mass Rupture Law and Seismic Focus Positioning Process Revealed by Microseismic Monitoring. Adv Mater Res 734–737:522–525

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tian X, Zhang W, Zhang J (2017) Cross double-difference inversion for simultaneous velocity model update and microseismic event location. Geophys Prospect 65:259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fang Z (2003) D-optimal designs for weighted polynomial regression. Stat Probab Lett 63(2):205–213

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang FC, Chang HC, Wang SS (2009) D-optimal designs for polynomial regression with exponential weight function. Metrika 70(3):339–354

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang FC, Tsai JS (2014) A limit theorem of D-optimal designs for weighted polynomial regression. J Stat Plan Inference 154(1):26–38

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Parsa Maram P, Jafari H (2016) Bayesian D-optimal design for logistic regression model with exponential distribution for random intercept. J Stat Comput Simul 86(10):1856–1868

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Z, Liu A, Wang C, Niu Z (2004) Evolving neural network using real coded genetic algorithm (GA) for multispectral image classification. Futur Gener Comput Syst 20(7):1119–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dasgupta K, Mandal B, Dutta P, Mandal JK, Dam S (2014) A Genetic Algorithm (GA) based Load Balancing Strategy for Cloud Computing. Procedia Technol 10:340–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mistry K, Zhang L, Neoh SC, Lim CP, Fielding B (2017) A Micro-GA Embedded PSO Feature Selection Approach to Intelligent Facial Emotion Recognition. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(6):1496–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moradi-Jalal M, Karney BW (2008) Optimal design and operation of irrigation pumping stations using mathematical programming and Genetic Algorithm (GA). J Hydraul Res 46(2):237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pal P, Das CB, Panda A, Bhunia AK (2005) An application of real-coded genetic algorithm (for mixed integer non-linear programming in an optimal two-warehouse inventory policy for deteriorating items with a linear trend in demand and a fixed planning horizon). Int J Comput Math 82(2):163–175

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Nawaz Ripon KS, Kwong S, Man KF (2007) A real-coding jumping gene genetic algorithm (RJGGA) for multiobjective optimization. Inf Sci (Ny) 177(2):632–654

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. He Y, Hui CW (2010) A binary coding genetic algorithm for multi-purpose process scheduling: A case study. Chem Eng Sci 65(16):4816–4828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Saravanan R, Asokan P, Sachidanandam M (2002) A multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) approach for optimization of surface grinding operations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(12):1327–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fetouh T, Zaky MS (2016) New approach to design SVC-based stabiliser using genetic algorithm and rough set theory. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11(2):372–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thammano A, Teekeng W (2015) A modified genetic algorithm with fuzzy roulette wheel selection for job-shop scheduling problems. Int J Gen Syst 44(4):499–518

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Maity S, Roy A, Maiti M (2015) A Modified Genetic Algorithm for solving uncertain Constrained Solid Travelling Salesman Problems. Comput Ind Eng 83:273–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pasala S, Kumar BN, Satapathy SC (2013) Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (FICTA) 199:477–485

  37. Jiao L, Li L, Shang R, Liu F, Stolkin R (2013) A novel selection evolutionary strategy for constrained optimization. Inf Sci (Ny) 239:122–141

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Applied Basic Research Program of Sichuan Province, China(No.2016JY0049). The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of the reviewers, which have improved the presentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, 610500, China

    Haibo Liang, Xin Qin & Muhammad Junaid Khan

  2. China National Offshore Oil Corporation Tianjin Branch, Tianjin, China

    Jianchong Gao

Authors
  1. Haibo Liang

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin Qin

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianchong Gao

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Junaid Khan

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toHaibo Liang.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection:Special Issue on Future Networking Applications Plethora for Smart Cities

Guest Editors: Mohamed Elhoseny, Xiaohui Yuan, and Saru Kumari

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, H., Qin, X., Gao, J.et al. Research on detector signal receiving network layout optimization model.Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl.13, 1284–1296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-019-00867-4

Download citation

Keywords

Associated Content

Part of a collection:

Special Issue on Future Networking Applications Plethora for Smart Cities

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp