• Adelson, E. H. (2001). On seeing stuff: the perception of materials by humans and machines. InProceedings of the SPIE: human vision and electronic imaging VI.

  Google Scholar 

• Boykov, Y., & Kolmogorov, V. (2004). An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,26(9), 1124–1137.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001). Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,23(11), 1222–1239.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carreira, J., & Sminchisescu, C. (2010). Constrained parametric min-cuts for automatic object segmentation. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Comaniciu, D., & Meer, P. (2002). Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,24(5), 603–619.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Coughlan, J. M., & Ferreira, S. J. (2002). Finding deformable shapes using loopy belief propagation. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Csurka, G., & Perronnin, F. (2010). An efficient approach to semantic segmentation.International Journal of Computer Vision doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0344-8.

• Delong, A., Osokin, A., Isack, H. N., & Boykov, Y. (2010). Fast approximate energy minimization with label costs. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010). The PASCAL visual object classes (VOC) challenge.International Journal of Computer Vision,88(2), 303–338.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Felzenszwalb, P. F., & Huttenlocher, D. P. (2004). Efficient graph-based image segmentation.International Journal of Computer Vision,59(2), 167–181.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010). Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,32(9), 1627–1645.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Freeman, W. T., Pasztor, E. C., & Carmichael, O. T. (2000). Learning low-level vision.International Journal of Computer Vision,40(1), 25–47.

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Frey, B., & MacKay, D. (1998). A revolution: belief propagation in graphs with cycles. InAdvances in neural information processing systems.

  Google Scholar 

• Fulkerson, B., Vedaldi, A., & Soatto, S. (2009). Class segmentation and object localization with superpixel neighborhoods. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Galleguillos, C., & Belongie, S. (2010). Context based object categorization: a critical survey.Computer Vision and Image Understanding,114, 712–722.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gonfaus, J., Boix, X., van de Weijer, J., Bagdanov, A., Serrat, J., & Gonzàlez, J. (2010). Harmony potentials for joint classification and segmentation. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Gould, S., Gao, T., & Koller, D. (2009). Region-based segmentation and object detection. InAdvances in neural information processing systems.

  Google Scholar 

• Hammersley, J. M., & Clifford, P. (1971). Markov fields on finite graphs and lattices. Unpublished.

• Hoiem, D., Efros, A. A., & Hebert, M. (2007). Recovering surface layout from an image.International Journal of Computer Vision,75(1), 151–172.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hoiem, D., Efros, A. A., & Hebert, M. (2008). Putting objects in perspective.International Journal of Computer Vision80(1), 3–15.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ihler, A., & McAllester, D. (2009). Particle belief propagation. InProc. int. conf. on artificial intelligence and statistics.

  Google Scholar 

• Ishikawa, H. (2009). Higher-order clique reduction in binary graph cut. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Jain, A., Gupta, A., & Davis, L. (2010). Learning what and how of contextual models for scene labeling. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Jiang, J., & Tu, Z. (2009). Efficient scale space auto-context for image segmentation and labeling. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Kohli, P., & Kumar, M. P. (2010). Energy minimization for linear envelope MRFs. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Kohli, P., Kumar, M. P., & Torr, P. H. (2009a). P³ and beyond: move making algorithms for solving higher order functions.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,31(9), 1645–1656.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kohli, P., Ladický, L., & Torr, P. H. (2009b). Robust higher order potentials for enforcing label consistency.International Journal of Computer Vision,82(3), 302–324.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koller, D., Lerner, U., & Angelov, D. (1999). A general algorithm for approximate inference and its application to hybrid Bayes nets. InProc. annual conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence.

  Google Scholar 

• Kumar, M. P., Torr, P., & Zisserman, A. (2005). Obj cut. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Kumar, S., & Hebert, M. (2005). A hierarchical field framework for unified context-based classification. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Ladicky, L., Russell, C., Kohli, P., & Torr, P. (2009). Associative hierarchical crfs for object class image segmentation. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Ladicky, L., Russell, C., Kohli, P., & Torr, P. H. S. (2010a). Graph cut based inference with co-occurrence statistics. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Ladicky, L., Sturgess, P., Alahari, K., Russell, C., & Torr, P. H. S. (2010b). What, where & how many? combining object detectors and crfs. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Lauritzen, S. L. (1996).Graphical models.Oxford statistical science series. London: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006). Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Lee, Y., & Grauman, K. (2010). Object-graphs for context-aware category discovery. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Leibe, B., Leonardis, A., & Schiele, B. (2008). Robust object detection with interleaved categorization and segmentation.International Journal of Computer Vision,77(1–3), 259–289.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lempitsky, V., Kohli, P., Rother, C., & Sharp, T. (2009). Image segmentation with a bounding box prior. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, A., & Weiss, Y. (2009). Learning to combine bottom-up and top-down segmentation.International Journal of Computer Vision,81(1), 1645–1656.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Li, F., Carreira, J., & Sminchisescu, C. (2010). Object recognition as ranking holistic figure-ground hypotheses. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Li, Y., & Huttenlocher, D. P. (2008). Sparse long-range random field and its application to image denoising. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Lim, J. J., Arbelaez, P., Gu, C., & Malik, J. (2009). Context by region ancestry. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Lowe, D. G. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints.International Journal of Computer Vision,60(2), 91–110.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maji, S., Berg, A. C., & Malik, J. (2008). Classification using intersection kernel support vector machines is efficient. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Marr, D. (1982).Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.

  Google Scholar 

• Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., & Malik, J. (2001). A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Martin, D. R., Fowlkes, C. C., & Malik, J. (2004). Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,26(5), 530–549.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mori, G., Ren, X., Efros, A. A., & Malik, J. (2004). Recovering human body configurations: combining segmentation and recognition. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Munoz, D., Bagnell, J. A., Vandapel, N., & Hebert, M. (2009). Contextual classification with functional max-margin Markov networks. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Munoz, D., Bagnell, J. A., & Hebert, M. (2010). Stacked hierarchical labeling. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Nowak, E., Jurie, F., & Triggs, B. (2006). Sampling strategies for bag-of-features image classification. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Ojala, T., Pietikäinen, M., & Mäenpää, T. (2002). Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,24(7), 971–987.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(12), 520–527.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pantofaru, C., Schmid, C., & Hebert, M. (2008). Object recognition by integrating multiple image segmentations. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Plath, N., Toussaint, M., & Nakajima, S. (2009). Multi-class image segmentation using conditional random fields and global classification. InProc. international conference on machine learning.

  Google Scholar 

• Platt, J. C. (1999). Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. InAdvances in large margin classifiers.

  Google Scholar 

• Rabinovich, A., Vedaldi, A., Galleguillos, C., Wiewiora, E., & Belongie, S. (2007). Objects in context. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Ramalingam, S., Kohli, P., Alahari, K., & Torr, P. H. S. (2008). Exact inference in multi-label crfs with higher order cliques. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Roth, S., & Black, M. J. (2009). Fields of experts.International Journal of Computer Vision,82(2), 205–229.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rother, C., Kohli, P., Feng, W., & Jia, J. (2009). Minimizing sparse higher order energy functions of discrete variables. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Russell, C., Ladicky, L., Kohli, P., & Torr, P. H. (2010). Exact and approximate inference in associative hierarchical random fields using graph-cuts. InProc. annual conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence.

  Google Scholar 

• van de Sande, K. E. A., Gevers, T., & Snoek, C. G. M. (2010). Evaluating color descriptors for object and scene recognition.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,32(10), 1582–1596.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schmid, C., & Mohr, R. (1997). Local greyvalue invariants for image retrieval.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,19(5), 530–535.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shahbaz Khan, F., van de Weijer, J., & Vanrell, M. (2009). Top-down color attention for object recognition. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Shechtman, E., & Irani, M. (2007). Matching local self-similarities across images and videos. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Shotton, J., Johnson, M., & Cipolla, R. (2008). Semantic texton forests for image categorization and segmentation. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Shotton, J., Winn, J., Rother, C., & Criminisi, A. (2009). Textonboost for image understanding: multi-class object recognition and segmentation by jointly modeling texture, layout, and context.International Journal of Computer Vision,81(1), 2–23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sivic, J., & Zisserman, A. (2003). Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Sudderth, E. B., Ihler, A. T., Ihler, E. T., Freeman, W. T., & Willsky, A. S. (2002). Nonparametric belief propagation. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Tu, Z., & Zhu, S. C. (2002). Image segmentation by data-driven Markov chain Monte Carlo.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,24(5), 657–673.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tu, Z., Chen, X., Yuille, AL, & Zhu, S. C. (2005). Image parsing: unifying segmentation, detection, and recognition.International Journal of Computer Vision,63(2), 18–25.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vazquez, E., Baldrich, R., van de Weijer, J., & Vanrell, M. (2011). Describing reflectances for colour segmentation robust to shadows, highlights and textures.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,33(5), 917–930.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vedaldi, A., & Soatto, S. (2008). Quick shift and kernel methods for mode seeking. InProc. European conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Verbeek, J., & Triggs, B. (2008). Scene segmentation with crfs learned from partially labeled images. InAdvances in neural information processing systems.

  Google Scholar 

• Wainwright, M. J., & Jordan, M. I. (2008).Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference. Hanover: Now Publishers Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• van de Weijer, J., Schmid, C., Verbeek, J., & Larlus, D. (2009). Learning color names for real-world applications.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,18(7), 1512–1523.

  Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Winn, J., & Jojic, N. (2005). Locus: learning object classes with unsupervised segmentation. InProc. IEEE int. conf. on computer vision.

  Google Scholar 

• Woodford, O., Torr, P. H., Reid, I., & Fitzgibbon, A. (2009). Global stereo reconstruction under second-order smoothness priors.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,31(12), 2115–2128.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yang, J., Yuz, K., Gongz, Y., & Huang, T. (2009). Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Yang, L., Meer, P., & Foran, D. J. (2007). Multiple class segmentation using a unified framework over mean-shift patches. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Yang, Y., Hallman, S., Ramanan, D., & Fowlkes, C. (2010). Layered object detection for multi-class segmentation. InProc. computer vision and pattern recognition.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, J., Marszałek, M., Lazebnik, S., & Schmid, C. (2007). Local features and kernels for classification of texture and object categories: a comprehensive study.International Journal of Computer Vision,73(2), 213–238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhu, L., Chen, Y., Lin, Y., Lin, C., & Yuille, A. L. (2008). Recursive segmentation and recognition templates for 2D parsing. InAdvances in neural information processing systems.

  Google Scholar 

Download references