• Brox, T. and Weickert, J. 2004. A TV flow based local scale measure for texture discrimination. In T. Pajdla and V. Hlavac (Eds.),European Conf. on Computer Vision, vol. 3022 of LNCS, Prague, Springer, pp. 578–590.

  Google Scholar 

• Caselles, V., Catté, F., Coll T., and Dibos, F., 1993. A geometric model for active contours in image processing.Numer. Math., 66:1–31.

  Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., and Sapiro, G. 1995. Geodesic active contours. InProc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Comp. Vis., Boston, USA, pp. 694–699.

• Chan, T.F. and Vese, L.A. 2001. Active contours without edges.IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 10(2):266–277.

  Google Scholar 

• Chan, T. and Zhu, W. 2003. Level set based shape prior segmentation. Technical Report 03–66, Computational Applied Mathematics, UCLA, Los Angeles.

  Google Scholar 

• Charpiat, G., Faugeras, O., and Keriven, R. 2005. Approximations of shape metrics and application to shape warping and empirical shape statistics.Journal of Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 5(1):1–58.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Chen, Y., Tagare, H., Thiruvenkadam, S., Huang, F., Wilson, D., Gopinath, K.S., Briggs, R.W., and Geiser, E. 2002. Using shape priors in geometric active contours in a variational framework.Int. J. of Computer Vision, 50(3):315–328.

  Google Scholar 

• Cootes, T., Taylor, C., Cooper, D.H., and Graham, J. 1992. Training models of shape from sets of examples. InBrit. Mach. Vis. Conf., pp. 9–18.

• Cootes, T.F. and Taylor, C.J. 1999. A mixture model for representing shape variation.Image and Vision Computing, 17(8):567–574.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cremers, D., Kohlberger, T., and Schnörr, C. 2003. Shape statistics in kernel space for variational image segmentation.Pattern Recognition, 36(9):1929–1943.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cremers, D., Osher, S.J., and Soatto, S. 2004. Kernel density estimation and intrinsic alignment for knowledge-driven segmentation: Teaching level sets to walk. InPattern Recognition, vol. 3175 ofLNCS, Springer, pp. 36–44.

• Cremers, D., Osher, S.J., and Soatto, S. 2004b. (To appear).

• Cremers, D. and Soatto, S. 2003. A pseudo-distance for shape priors in level set segmentation. In N. Paragios (Ed.),IEEE 2nd Int. Workshop on Variational, Geometric and Level Set Methods, Nice, pp. 169–176.

• Cremers, D. and Soatto, S. 2005. Motion competition: A variational framework for piecewise parametric motion segmentation.Int. J. of Computer Vision, 62(3):249–265.

  Google Scholar 

• Cremers, D., Sochen, N., and Schnörr, C. 2003. Towards recognition-based variational segmentation using shape priors and dynamic labeling. In L. Griffith (Ed.),Int. Conf. on Scale Space Theories in Computer Vision, volume 2695 ofLNCS, Isle of Skye, Springer, pp. 388–400.

• Cremers, D., Sochen, N., and Schnörr, C. 2004. Multiphase dynamic labeling for variational recognition-driven image segmentation. In T. Pajdla and V. Hlavac (Eds.),European Conf. on Computer Vision, vol. 3024 ofLNCS, Springer, pp. 74–86.

• Cremers, D., Tischhäuser, F., Weickert, J., and Schnörr, C. 2002. Diffusion snakes: Introducing statistical shape knowledge into the Mumford-Shah functional.Int. J. of Computer Vision, 50(3):295–313.

  Google Scholar 

• Dervieux, A. and Thomasset, F. 1979. A finite element method for the simulation of Raleigh-Taylor instability.Springer Lect. Notes in Math., 771:145–158.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Dervieux, A. and Thomasset, F. 1981. Multifluid incompressible flows by a finite element method.Lecture Notes in Physics, 11:158–163.

  Google Scholar 

• Heiler, M. and Schnörr, C. 2005. Natural image statistics for natural image segmentation.Int. J. of Computer Vision, 63(1):5–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Kichenassamy, S., Kumar, A., Olver, P.J., Tannenbaum, A., and Yezzi, A.J. 1995. Gradient flows and geometric active contour models. InProc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Comp. Vis., Boston, USA pp. 810–815.

• Leventon, M., Crimson, W., and Faugeras, O. 2000. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. InCVPR, Hilton Head Island, SC, vol. 1, pp. 316–323.

• Malladi, R., Sethian, J.A., and Vemuri, B.C. 1995. Shape modeling with front propagation: A level set approach.IEEE PAMI, 17(2):158–175.

  Google Scholar 

• Mumford, D. and Shah, J. 1989. Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 42:577–685.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Osher, S.J. and Sethian, J.A. 1988. Fronts propagation with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton–-Jacobi formulations.J. of Comp. Phys., 79:12–49.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Paragios, N. and Deriche, R. 2002. Geodesic active regions and level set methods for supervised texture segmentation.Int. J. of Computer Vision, 46(3): 223–247.

  Google Scholar 

• Riklin-Raviv, T., Kiryati, N., and Sochen, N. 2004. Unlevel sets: Geometry and prior-based segmentation. In T. Pajdla and V. Hlavac (Eds.),European Conf. on Computer Vision, volume 3024 ofLNCS, Prague, Springer, pp. 50–61.

• Rousson, M. and Cremers, D. 2005. Efficient kernel density estimation of shape and intensity priors for level set segmentation. InMICCAI (To appear).

• Rousson, M. and Deriche, R.A. 2002. variational framework for active and adaptive segmentation of vector valued images. InProc. IEEE Workshop on Motion and Video Computing, Orlando, Florida, pp. 56–62.

• Rousson, M. and Paragios, N. 2002. Shape priors for level set representations. In A. Heyden et al. (Eds.)Proc. of the Europ. Conf. on Comp. Vis., volume 2351 ofLNCS, Springer, Copenhagen, Berlin, pp. 78–92.

  Google Scholar 

• Rousson, M., Paragios, N., and Deriche, R. 2004. Implicit active shape models for 3d segmentation in MRI imaging. InMICCAI, pp. 209–216.

• Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., and Fatemi, E. 1992. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms.Physica D, 60:259–268.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sagiv, C., Sochen, N., and Zeevi, Y. 2001. Geodesic active contours applied to texture feature space. In M. Kerckhove (Ed.)Intl. Conf. on Scale Space Theories for Comp. Vision, vol. 2106 ofLNCS, Springer, pp. 344–352.

• Sussman, M., Smereka P., and Osher, S.J. 1994. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible twophase flow.J. of Comp. Phys., 94:146–159.

  Google Scholar 

• Tsai, A., Yezzi, A., Wells, W., Tempany, C., Tucker, D., Fan, A., Crimson, E., and Willsky, A. 2001. Model-based curve evolution technique for image segmentation. InComp. Vision Patt. Recog., Kauai, Hawaii, pp. 463–468.

  Google Scholar 

• Tsai, A., Yezzi, A.J., and Willsky, A.S. 2001. Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification.IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 10(8):1169–1186.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vese, L.A. and Chan, T.F. 2002. A multiphase level set framework for image processing using the Mumford-Shah functional.Int. J. of Computer Vision, 50(3):271–293.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhu, S.C. and Yuille, A. 1996. Region competition: Unifying snakes, region growing, and Bayes/MDL for multiband image segmentation.IEEE PAMI, 18(9):884–900.

  Google Scholar 

Download references