Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Urban biodiversity: State of the science and future directions

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1990s, recognition of urban biodiversity research has increased steadily. Knowledge of how ecological communities respond to urban pressures can assist in addressing global questions related to biodiversity. To assess the state of this research field in meeting this aim, we conducted a systematic review of the urban biodiversity literature published since 1990. We obtained data from 1209 studies that sampled ecological communities representing 12 taxonomic groups. While advances have been made in the field over the last 30 years, we found that urban biodiversity research has primarily been conducted in single cities within the Palearctic and Nearctic realms, within forest remnants and residential locations, and predominantly surveys plants and birds, with significant gaps in research within the Global South and little integration of multi-species and multi-trophic interactions. Sample sizes remain limited in spatial and temporal scope, but citizen science and remote sensing resources have broadened these efforts. Analytical approaches still rely on taxonomic diversity to describe urban plant and animal communities, with increasing numbers of integrated phylogenetic and trait-based analyses. Despite the implementation of nature-based solutions across the world’s cities, only 5% of studies link biodiversity to ecosystem function and services, pointing to substantial gaps in our understanding of such solutions. We advocate for future research that encompasses a greater diversity of taxonomic groups and urban systems, focusing on biodiversity hotspots. Implementing such research would enable researchers to move forward in an equitable and multidisciplinary way to tackle the complex issues facing global urban biodiversity.

Graphical abstract

Word cloud from titles of 1209 publications on urban biodiversity from 1990–2018.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The dataset  is available via the UrBioNet Database on the University of Missouri’s MOspace athttps://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/46235.

Code availability

Web of Science search terms are provided within the Supplementary Information.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study resulted from a workshop held at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, funded by the National Science Foundation’s UrBioNet Research Coordination Network (grant no. DEB 1354676/1355151). We thank Carmela Buono, Eliana Geretz, Chris Hensley, Natalia Schneider, Hui-Anne Tan, and Christopher Trisos for their assistance with aspects of the data collection and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the draft manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation’s UrBioNet Research Coordination Network (grant no. DEB 1354676/1355151).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS, 66762, USA

    Christine C. Rega-Brodsky

  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08816, USA

    Myla F. J. Aronson

  3. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA

    Max R. Piana

  4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office, 177 Admiral Cochrane Dr, Annapolis, MD, 21401, USA

    Ela-Sita Carpenter

  5. School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Burnley Campus 500 Yarra Blvd, Richmond, 3121 VIC, Australia

    Amy K. Hahs & Nicholas S. G. Williams

  6. Department of Environmental Science, College of Natural Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico

    Adriana Herrera-Montes

  7. Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Sonja Knapp

  8. Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140, Lahti, Finland

    D. Johan Kotze & Ian MacGregor-Fors

  9. School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA

    Christopher A. Lepczyk

  10. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Marco Moretti

  11. The Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, IL, 60532, USA

    Allyson B. Salisbury

  12. Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89077, Ulm, Germany

    Kirsten Jung

  13. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Faculty Excellence Program for Leadership in Public Science, North Carolina State University, Chancellor’, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA

    Madhusudan Katti

  14. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, M1C 1A4, Canada

    J. Scott MacIvor

  15. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA

    Frank A. La Sorte

  16. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Campus, Box 8008, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA

    Vallari Sheel

  17. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Caragh G. Threfall

  18. School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Charles H. Nilon

Authors
  1. Christine C. Rega-Brodsky

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Myla F. J. Aronson

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Max R. Piana

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ela-Sita Carpenter

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amy K. Hahs

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Adriana Herrera-Montes

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sonja Knapp

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. D. Johan Kotze

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christopher A. Lepczyk

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Marco Moretti

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. Allyson B. Salisbury

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nicholas S. G. Williams

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. Kirsten Jung

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  14. Madhusudan Katti

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ian MacGregor-Fors

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  16. J. Scott MacIvor

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  17. Frank A. La Sorte

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  18. Vallari Sheel

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  19. Caragh G. Threfall

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  20. Charles H. Nilon

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This study was developed during the UrBioNet workshop held at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 27–31 March 2017. All authors either designed the study, conducted the literature search, and/or reviewed studies resulting from the literature search. CCR-B, MFJA, MRP, AKH, and NSGW analyzed the data. CCR-B and MFJA wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript, and approved its final form.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toChristine C. Rega-Brodsky.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

We certify that we have no conflicts of interest regarding this work.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rega-Brodsky, C.C., Aronson, M.F.J., Piana, M.R.et al. Urban biodiversity: State of the science and future directions.Urban Ecosyst25, 1083–1096 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01207-w

Download citation

Keywords

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp