• Alperin, J. P. (2015). Geographic variation in social media metrics: An analysis of Latin American journal articles.Aslib Journal of Information Management,67(3), 289–304.https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2014-0176

  Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Alperin, J. P., Fleerackers, A., Riedlinger, M., & Haustein, S. (2023). Second-order citations in altmetrics: A case study analyzing the audiences of COVID-19 research in the news and on social media.Quantitative Science Studies.https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00298

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Alperin, J. P., Gomez, C. J., & Haustein, S. (2019). Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles.Public Understanding of Science,28(1), 2–18.https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518761733

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arroyo-Machado, W., & Robinson-Garcia, N. (2021). Big Data and the birth of a Science of Humanities. The 1st International Conference on Humanities and Big Data in Ibero-America: Methological issues and practical applications. Zenodo. Preprint retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5793176

• Arroyo-Machado, W., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2021). Web of Science categories (WC, SC, main categories) and ESI disciplines mapping. Figshare.https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14695176.v2

• Arroyo-Machado, W., Torres-Salinas, D., & Costas, R. (2022). Wikinformetrics: Construction and description of an open wikipedia knowledge graph dataset for informetric purposes.Quantitative Science Studies.https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00226

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arroyo-Machado, W., Torres-Salinas, D., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Romero-Frías, E. (2020). Science through Wikipedia: A novel representation of open knowledge through co-citation networks.PLoS ONE,15(2), e0228713.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228713

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arroyo-Machado, W., Torres-Salinas, D., & Robinson-Garcia, N. (2021). Identifying and characterizing social media communities: A socio-semantic network approach to altmetrics.Scientometrics,126(11), 9267–9289.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04167-8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bogomoletc, E., Goodwin, J., & Binder, A. R. (2021). Masks don’t work but you should get one: Circulation of the science of masking during the covid-19 pandemic. In D. M. Berube (Ed.),Pandemic Communication and Resilience (pp. 213–244). NY: Springer International Publishing.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics.Journal of Informetrics,8(4), 895–903.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Marx, W. (2016). Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?Scientometrics,109(3), 1477–1495.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2012). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say?International Journal of Science Education, Part B,2(1), 23–41.https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.611627

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brechman, J., Lee, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2009). Lost in translation?: A comparison of cancer-genetics reporting in the press release and its subsequent coverage in the press.Science Communication,30(4), 453–474.https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009332649

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Camic, C., Gross, N., & Lamont, M. (2011).Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Caron, E., & Eck, N.-J. (2014). Large scale author name disambiguation using rule-based scoring and clustering: International conference on science and technology indicators. In E. Noyons (Ed.),Proceedings of the Science and Technology Indicators Conference 2014 (pp. 79–86). Universiteit Leiden.http://sti2014.cwts.nl

• Chan, L., Cuplinskas, D., Eisen, M. B., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J.-C., Hagemann, M., Harnad, S., Johnson, R., Kupryte, R., La Manna, M., Rev, I., Segbert, M., De Souza, S., Suber, P., & Velterop, J. (2002, February 14).Budapest open access initiative. Preprint retrieved fromhttps://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read

• Costas, R., de Rijcke, S., & Marres, N. (2021). “Heterogeneous couplings”: Operationalizing network perspectives to study science-society interactions through social media metrics.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,72(5), 595–610.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24427

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davies, S. R., & Hará, N. (2017). Public science in a wired world: How online media are shaping science communication.Science Communication,39(5), 563–568.https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017736892

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Díaz-Faes, A. A., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2019). Towards a second generation of ‘social media metrics’: Characterizing Twitter communities of attention around science.PLoS ONE,14(5), e0216408.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216408

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Docampo, D. (2013). Reproducibility of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities results.Scientometrics,94(2), 567–587.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0801-y

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Elías, C., & Catalan-Matamoros, D. (2020). Coronavirus in Spain: Fear of ‘official’ Fake news boosts whatsapp and alternative sources.Media and Communication,8(2), 462–466.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Enkhbayar, A., Haustein, S., Barata, G., & Alperin, J. P. (2020). How much research shared on Facebook happens outside of public pages and groups? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers.Quantitative Science Studies,1(2), 749–770.https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00044

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact.Journal of Medical Internet Research,13(4), e123.https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fang, Z., Dudek, J., Noyons, R. C., Fang, Z., Dudek, J., Noyons, E., & Costas, R. (2020).Science cited in policy documents: Evidence from the Overton database. Altmetrics Conference. Preprint retrieved fromhttp://altmetrics.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/02_submission_Fang_Dudek_Noyons_Costas-altmetrics20.pdf

• Fang, Z., Costas, R., Tian, W., Wang, X., & Wouters, P. (2020a). An extensive analysis of the presence of altmetric data for Web of Science publications across subject fields and research topics.Scientometrics,124(3), 2519–2549.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fang, Z., Costas, R., Tian, W., Wang, X., & Wouters, P. (2021). How is science clicked on Twitter? Click metrics for bitly short links to scientific publications.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,72(7), 918–932.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24458

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fischhoff, B. (2013). The sciences of science communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fleerackers, A., Nehring, L., Maggio, L. A., Enkhbayar, A., Moorhead, L., & Alperin, J. P. (2022). Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data.Scientometrics.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04510-7

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fleerackers, A., Shores, K., Chtena, N., & Alperin, J. P. (2024). Unreviewed science in the news: The evolution of preprint media coverage from 2014–2021.Quantitative Science Studies,27, 1–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Fraser, N., Brierley, L., Dey, G., Polka, J. K., Pálfy, M., Nanni, F., & Coates, J. A. (2021). The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape.PLOS Biology,19(4), e3000959.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grand, A., Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K., & Winfield, A. F. T. (2012). Open science: A new, “trust technology”?Science Communication,34(5), 679–689.https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012443021

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hassan, S.-U., Imran, M., Gillani, U., Aljohani, N. R., Bowman, T. D., & Didegah, F. (2017). Measuring social media activity of scientific literature: An exhaustive comparison of scopus and novel altmetrics big data.Scientometrics,113(2), 1037–1057.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2512-x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Hellsten, I., & Marx, W. (2019). Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags.Journal of Informetrics,13(2), 695–707.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.008

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haustein, S. (2016). Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies.Scientometrics.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1910-9

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., & Costas, R. (2016). Interpreting ‘altmetrics’: Viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories. In C. R. Sugimoto (Ed.),Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication (pp. 372–406). De Gruyter.

  Google Scholar 

• Hellsten, I., Opthof, T., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). N-mode network approach for socio-semantic analysis of scientific publications.Poetics,78, 101427.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hicks, D., Melkers, M., Barna, J., Isett, K. R., & Gilbert, G. H. (2019). Comparison of the accuracy of CBCT effective radiation dose information in peer-reviewed journals and dental media.General Dentistry,67(3), 38–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Hicks, D., Zullo, M., Doshi, A., & Asensio, O. I. (2022). Widespread use of national academies consensus reports by the American public.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,119(9), e2107760119.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2107760119

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Isett, K. R., & Hicks, D. (2020). Pathways from research into public decision making: Intermediaries as the third community.Perspectives on Public Management and Governance,3(1), 45–58.https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz020

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kavanaugh, A. L., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S. D., Yang, S., Li, L. T., Shoemaker, D. J., Natsev, A., & Xie, L. (2012). Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical.Government Information Quarterly,29(4), 480–491.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.002

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Logan, R. A. (2001). Science Mass Communication: Its Conceptual History.Science Communication,23(2), 135–163.https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023002004

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moed, H. F. (2016). Altmetrics as traces of the computerization of the research process. In C. R. Sugimoto (Ed.),Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication (pp. 360–371). De Gruyter.

  Google Scholar 

• Moorhead, L., Krakow, M., & Maggio, L. (2021). What cancer research makes the news? A quantitative analysis of online news stories that mention cancer studies.PLoS ONE,16(3), e0247553.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247553

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nane, G. F., van Schalkwyk, F., Dudek, J., Torres-Salinas, D., Costas, R., & Robinson-Garcia, N. (2021). The role of scientific output in public debates in times of crisis: A case study of the reopening of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. In D. M. Berube (Ed.),Pandemic Communication and Resilience (pp. 307–329). Springer International Publishing.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Nane, T., Robinson-Garcia, N., van Schalkwyk, F., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2021).COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: Growth, open access and scientific fields. College Park: SocArXiv.

  Google Scholar 

• Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review.Scientometrics,66(1), 81–100.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2

  Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Noyons, E. (2019). Measuring societal impact is as complex as ABC.Journal of Data and Information Science,4(3), 6–21.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ortega, J. L. (2018). Reliability and accuracy of altmetric providers: A comparison among Altmetric.com.PlumX and Crossref Event Data. Scientometrics,116(3), 2123–2138.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2838-z

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ortega, J. L. (2020). Blogs and news sources coverage in altmetrics data providers: A comparative analysis by country, language, and subject.Scientometrics,122(1), 555–572.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03299-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pinheiro, H., Vignola-Gagné, E., & Campbell, D. (2021). A large-scale validation of the relationship between cross-disciplinary research and its uptake in policy-related documents, using the novel overton altmetrics database.Quantitative Science Studies,2(2), 616–642.

  Google Scholar 

• Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010, October 26).Altmetrics: A manifesto – altmetrics.org. Preprint retrieved fromhttp://altmetrics.org/manifesto/

• Priem, J. (2014). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.),Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (pp. 263–288). MIT Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Ramos-Vielba, I., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Woolley, R. (2022). A value creation model from science-society interconnections: Archetypal analysis combining publications, survey and altmetric data.PLoS ONE,17(6), e0269004.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269004

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Riise, J. (2008). Bringing science to the public. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.),Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New models, new practices (pp. 301–309). Netherlands: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Robinson-Garcia, N., Arroyo-Machado, W., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2019). Mapping social media attention in microbiology: Identifying main topics and actors.FEMS Microbiology Letters.https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz075

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., Isett, K., Melkers, J., & Hicks, D. (2017). The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles.PLoS ONE,12(8), e0183551.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183551

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robinson-García, N., Torres-Salinas, D., Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2014). New data, new possibilities: Exploring the insides of Altmetric.Com. El Profesional De La Información,23(4), 359–366.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robinson-Garcia, N., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Ràfols, I. (2018). Using altmetrics for contextualised mapping of societal impact: From hits to networks.Science and Public Policy,45(6), 815–826.https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy024

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information.PLoS ONE,7(5), e35869.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035869

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Singh, H., West, R., & Colavizza, G. (2021). Wikipedia citations: A comprehensive data set of citations with identifiers extracted from english wikipedia.Quantitative Science Studies,2(1), 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00105

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spaapen, J., & van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment.Research Evaluation,20(3), 211–218.https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876742

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,68(9), 2037–2062.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Castillo-Valdivieso, P. A. (2020). Open access and altmetrics in the pandemic age: Forescast analysis on COVID-19 literature.BioRxiv.,26, 450.

  Google Scholar 

• Torres-Salinas, D., Gorraiz, J., & Robinson-Garcia, N. (2018). The insoluble problems of books: What does Altmetric.com have to offer?Aslib Journal of Information Management,70(6), 691–707.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2016). Can we use altmetrics at the institutional level? A case study analysing the coverage by research areas of four Spanish universities.STI 2016 Conference: Peripheries, Frontiers and Beyond. 21st Conference on Science and Technology Indicators.Valencia.

  Google Scholar 

• Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., Jiménez-Contreras, E., Herrera, F., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2013). On the use of biplot analysis for multivariate bibliometric and scientific indicators.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,64(7), 1468–1479.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22837

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the science citation index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance.Scientometrics,51(1), 335–346.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484

  Article  Google Scholar 

• van Schalkwyk, F., & Dudek, J. (2022). Reporting preprints in the media during the COVID-19 pandemic.Public Understanding of Science,31(5), 608–616.https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221077392

  Article  Google Scholar 

• van Schalkwyk, F., Dudek, J., & Costas, R. (2020). Communities of shared interests and cognitive bridges: The case of the anti-vaccination movement on Twitter.Scientometrics,125(2), 1499–1516.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03551-0

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012).Users, Narcissism and Control—Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21 st Century. Preprint retrieved fromhttp://www.research-acumen.eu/wp-content/uploads/Users-narcissism-and-control.pdf

• Yeo, S. K., Liang, X., Brossard, D., Rose, K. M., Korzekwa, K., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2017). The case of #arseniclife: Blogs and Twitter in informal peer review.Public Understanding of Science,26(8), 937–952.https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516649806

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2018). General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators.PLoS ONE,13(5), e0197326.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197326

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications.Scientometrics,101(2), 1491–1513.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zastrow, M. (2020). Open science takes on the coronavirus pandemic.Nature,581, 7806.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references