Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Impact of Surveillance Method and Record Source on Autism Prevalence: Collaboration with Utah Maternal and Child Health Programs

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing number of Utah children identified with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), information on the prevalence and characteristics of these children could help Maternal Child Health (MCH) programs develop population building activities focused on prevention, screening, and education. The purpose of this study is to describe Utah’s autism registry developed in collaboration with state MCH programs and assess the impact of different record-based surveillance methods on state ASD prevalence rates. The study was conducted using 212 ASD cases identified from a population of 26,217 eight year olds living in one of the three most populous counties in Utah (Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah) in 2002. ASD prevalence was determined using two records based approaches (administrative diagnoses versus abstraction and clinician review) by source of record ascertainment (education, health, and combined). ASD prevalence ranged from 7.5 per 1000 (95% CI 6.4–8.5) to 3.2 per 1000 (95% CI 2.5–3.9) varying significantly (P < .05) based on method and record source. The ratio of male-to-female ranged from 4.7:1 to 6.4:1. No significant differences were found between the two case ascertainment methods on 18 of the 23 case characteristics including median household income, parental education, and mean age of diagnosis. Broad support is needed from both education and health sources as well as collaboration with MCH programs to address the growing health concerns, monitoring, and treatment needs of children and their families impacted by autism spectrum disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2002 Principal Investigators. (2007). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 Sites, United States, 2002.MMWR,56(SS-1), 12–28.

  2. Ritvo, E. T., Freeman, B. J., Pingree, C., et al. (1989). The UCLA-University of Utah epidemiologic survey of autism prevalence.The American Journal of Psychiatry,146(2), 194–199.

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fombonne, E. (2006). Past and future perspectives in autism epidemiology. In S. O. Molden & J. L. R. Rubenstein (Eds.),Understanding autism (pp. 25–48). Baca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blaxhill, M. F. (2004). What’s going on? The question of time trends in autism.Public Health Reports,119(6), 536–551. doi:10.1016/j.phr.2004.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wazana, A., Bresnahan, M., & Kline, J. (2007). The autism epidemic: Fact or artifact?Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,46(6), 721–730. doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31804a7f3b.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shattuck, P. T. (2006). The contribution of diagnostic substitution to the growing administrative prevalence of autism in US special education.Pediatrics,117, 1028–1037. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1516.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Newschaffer, C. J., Croen, L. A., Daniels, J., Giarelli, E., Grether, J. K., et al. (2007). The epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders.Annual Review of Public Health,28, 235–258. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144007.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pinborough-Zimmerman, J., & McMahon, W. (2008). Autism: An urgent public health and education concern.The Utah Special Educator, Monograph Edition, 28(3)8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kogan, M. D., Strickland, B. B., Blumberg, S. J., Singh, G. K., Perrin, J. M., & van Dyck, P. C. (2008). A national profile of the health care experiences and family impact of autism spectrum disorder among children in the United States, 2005–2006.Pediatrics,112(6), e1149–e1158. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandell, D. S., Cao, J., Ittenbach, R., & Pinto-Martin, J. (2006). Medicaid expenditures for children with autistic spectrum disorders: 1994 to 1999.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,36(4), 475–485. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0088-z.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Utah Registry of Autism and Developmental Disabilities.http://health.utah.gov/autism. Accessed on April 6, 2009.

  12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2007).Maternal and child health services title V block grant program: Guidance and forms for the title V application/annual report fourth edition. Rockville, MD: Maternal and Child Health Bureau, pp. 5–31.

  13. Croen, L. A., Grether, J. K., Hoogstrate, J., & Selvin, S. (2002). The changing prevalence of autism in California.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,32, 207–215. doi:10.1023/A:1015453830880.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mind Institute 2002 M.I.N.D. The epidemiology of autism in California. Report to the legislature on the principal findings from the epidemiology of autism in California: A comprehensive pilot study.http://www.mindfully.org/Health/2002/Autism-In-California-MIND17oct02.htm. Accessed on January 08, 2009.

  15. Newscaffer, C. J., Falb, M. D., & Gurney, J. G. (2005). National autism prevalence trends from the United States special education data.Pediatrics,115(3), e277–e282. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rice, C., Baio, J., Van Naarden Braun, K., Doernberg, N., Meaney, F. J., Kirby, R. S., et al. (2007). Determining the prevalence of the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in the United States: Methodology used by the CDC-funded ADDM.Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology,21(2), 179–190. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00801.x.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Naarden Braun, K., Pettygrove, S., Daniels, J., et al. (2007). Evaluation of a methodology for a collaborative multiple source surveillance network for autism spectrum disorders—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, United States, 2002.MMWR, 29–40.

  18. Yeargin-Allsop, M., Rice, C., Karapurkar, T., Doernberg, N., Boyle, C., & Murphy, C. (2003). Prevalence of autism in a US metropolitan area.Journal of the American Medical Association,289(1), 49–55. doi:10.1001/jama.289.1.49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laidler, J. R. (2005). US department of education data on “autism” are not reliable for tracking autism prevalence.Pediatrics,16, e120–e124. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Utah Code––Title 26––Utah Health Code.http://www.le.state.ut.us/~code/TITLE26/TITLE26.htm. Accessed on March 6, 2008.

  21. International Classification of Diseases. (1988).Clinical modification (9th Rev.). Washington, DC: Public Health Service, US Dept of Health and Human Services.

  22. United States Department of Education.http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,regs,300,A,300%252E8,c. Accessed on April 6, 2009.

  23. Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget, Utah Population Estimates Committee.http://www.governor.utah.gov/dea/UPEC.html. Accessed on April 6, 2009.

  24. Pinborough-Zimmerman, J., Satterfield, R., Miller, J., Bilder, D., Hossain, S., & McMahon, W. (2007). Communication disorders: Prevalence and comorbid intellectual disability, autism and emotional/behavioral disorders.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,16(4), 359–367. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/039).

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Utah Birth Defect Network.http://hlunix.hl.state.ut.us/birthdefect. Accessed on October 7, 2008.

  26. Utah Department of Health’s Baby Watch Early Intervention Program.http://www.utahbabywatch.org. Accessed on October 7, 2008.

  27. Utah Department of Health’s Child Health Advanced Records Management Program.http://charm.health.utah.gov. Accessed on October 7, 2008.

  28. Utah Department of Health’s Center for Health Data IBIS-PH.http://ibis.health.utah.gov. Accessed on October 7, 2008.

  29. Bilder, D., Pinborough-Zimmerman, J., Miller, J., & McMahon, W. (2009). Prenatal, perinatal and neonatal factors associated with autism spectrum disorders.Pediatrics, in press.

  30. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Maternal child health bureau programs: Children with special health care needs MCHB objective.http://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs/default.htm. Accessed on April 6, 2009.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Cooperative Agreement CCU822365 to establish Population-Based Surveillance of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Thanks are extended to Jeff Duncan, Lynne MacCleod, Judith Miller, Barry Nangle, Chuck Norlin, Lyle Odenhayl, Carmen Pingree, and David Sundwall, Wu Xu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Judith Pinborough-Zimmerman, Deborah Bilder & William McMahon

  2. Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Robert Satterfield & Shaheen Hossain

Authors
  1. Judith Pinborough-Zimmerman

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deborah Bilder

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Satterfield

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shaheen Hossain

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. William McMahon

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJudith Pinborough-Zimmerman.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinborough-Zimmerman, J., Bilder, D., Satterfield, R.et al. The Impact of Surveillance Method and Record Source on Autism Prevalence: Collaboration with Utah Maternal and Child Health Programs.Matern Child Health J14, 392–400 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0472-3

Download citation

Keywords

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp