• Aerts A.T.M., Szirbik N.B., Goossenaerts J.B.M. (2002). A flexible, agent-based ICT architecture for virtual enterprises. Computers in Industry 49: 311–327

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Akoka J., Wattiau I.C. (1996). Entity-relationship and object-oriented model automatic clustering. Data & Knowledge Engineering 20: 87–117

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Avancha, S., Joshi, A., & Finin, T. (2002). Enhanced service discovery in Bluetooth.Communications, 96–99.

• Baltrusch, R. (2001). Exploring organisational learning in virtual forms of organization. InProceedings of the 34th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Vol. 4, pp. 4029–4038.

• Bartfai G. (1996). An ART-based modular architecture for learning hierarchical clusterings. Neurocomputing 13: 31–45

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Camarinha-Matos L.M., Afsarmanesh H. (2003). Elements of a base VE infrastructure. Computers in Industry 51: 139–163

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S., Rosen D.B. (1991). Fuzzy ART: Fast stable learning and categorization of analog pattern by an adaptive resonance system. Neural Networks 4: 759–771

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Colucci S., Noia T.D., Sciascio E.D., Donini F.M., Mongiello M. (2005). Concept abduction and contraction for semantic-based discovery of matches and negotiation spaces in an e-marketplace. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 4: 345–361

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goldman C.V., Rosenschein J.S. (2002). Evolutionary patterns of agent organizations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A 32: 135–148

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hishiyama, R., & Ishida, T. (2005). Modeling e-procurement as co-adaptive matchmaking with mutual relevance feedback. In: M. W. Barley & N. Kasabov (Eds.),PRIMA 2004, LNAI 3371 (pp. 67–80). Springer.

• Huang J., Georgiopoulos M., Heileman G.L. (1995). Fuzzy ART properties. Neural Networks 8: 203–213

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ioerger, T. R. (2004). Reasoning about beliefs, observability, and information exchange in teamwork. In17th International conference of the Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS’04).

• ISO (1994). Application protocol: Configuration controlled design, IS 10303—Part 203.

• Jeng, J. J., & Cheng, B. H. C. (1995). Specification matching for software reuse.ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 20.

• Jiang P., Mair Q., Newman J. (2006). The application of UML to the design of processes supporting product configuration management. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 19: 393–407

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jiang, P., Peng, Y., Mair, Q., & Yuan, M. (2005). A variable-resolution virtual sensor in social behaviour networks. In H. Czap (Ed.),Self-organization and automatic informatics(I) (pp. 86–94). ISO Press.

• Kopena, J., & Regli, W. C. (2003). DAMLJessKB: A tool for reasoning with the semantic web.IEEE Intelligent Systems, 74–77.

• Kuokka D., Harada L. (1996). Integrating information via matchmaking. Intelligent Information Systems 6: 261–279

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kurbel K., Loutchko I. (2005). A model for multi-lateral negotiations on an agent-based marketplace for personnel acquisition. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 4: 187–203

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee J., Liu K.F.R., Wang Y.C., Chiang W. (2004). Possibilistic Petri nets as a basis for agent service description language. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 144: 105–126

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liberatore P. (2000). The complexity of belief update. Artificial Intelligence 119: 141–190

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu H., Petrovic M., Jacobsen H. (2005). Efficient and scalable filtering of graph-based metadata. Journal of Web Semantics 3: 294–310

  Google Scholar 

• Ludwig S.A., Reyhani S.M.S. (2005). Introduction of semantic matchmaking to grid computing. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 65: 1533–1541

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ludwig, S. A., Naylor, W., Padget, J., & Rana, O. F. (2005). Matchmaking support for mathematical web services.Proceedings of the UK e-science all hands meeting, Nottingham UK.

• Ludwig S.A., Reyhani S.M.S. (2006). Semantic approach to service discovery in a Grid environment. Journal of Web Semantics 4: 1–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Martinez M.T., Park K.H., Favrel J. (2001). Virtual enterprise: Organisation, evolution and control. International Journal of Production Economics 74: 225–238

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miao C.Y., Goh A., Miao Y., Yang Z.H. (2002). Agent that models, reasons and makes decisions. Knowledge-Based Systems 15: 302–211

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Missikoff, M., & Taglino, F. (2004). An ontology-based platform for semantic interoperability.Handbook on ontologies (pp. 617–634). Springer.

• Noia, T. D., Sciascio, E. D., Donini, F. M., & Mongiello, M. (2003). A system for principled matchmaking in an electronic marketplace. InThe twelfth international world wide web conference, Budapest, Hungary.

• Norman T.J., Preece A., et al. (2004). Agent-based formation of virtual organizations. Knowledge-Based Systems 17: 103–111

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2003).Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

• Saridis G.N. (1989). Analytical formulation of the principle of increasing precision with decreasing intelligence for intelligent machines. Automatica 25: 461–467

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shoham, Y. (1991). AGENT-0: A simple agent language and its interpreter.Proceedings of the ninth national conference on artificial intelligence, Anaheim, CA, Vol. 2, pp. 704–709.

• Shoham Y. (1993). Agent-oriented programming. Artificial Intelligence 60: 51–92

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Subbu R., Sanderson A.C. (2004). Network-based distributed planning using coevolutionary agents: Architecture and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A 34: 257–269

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sycara K., Klusch M., Widoff S., Lu J. (1999). Dynamic service matchmaking among agents in open information environments. ACM SIGMOD Record 28: 47–53

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tektonidis, D., Bokma, A., Oatley, G., & Salampasis, M. (2005). Onar: An ontologies-based service oriented application integration framework.Interoperability of enterprise software and applications, Geneva, Switzerland.

• Trastour D., Bartolini C., Preist C. (2003). Semantic web support for the business-to-business e-commerce pre-contractual lifecycle. Computer Networks 42: 661–673

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Unland R., Kirn S., Wanka U., Hare G., Abbas S. (1995). Aegis: Agent oriented organizations. Accting Mgmt & Info Tech 5: 139–162

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Williams J., Steele N. (2002). Difference, distance and similarity as a basis for fuzzy decision support based on prototypical decision classes. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 131: 35–46

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wooldridge, M. J., & Jennings, N. R. (Eds.) (1995).Intelligent agents: ECAI-94 workshop on agent theories, architectures, and languages. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

• Yuan, M., Jiang, P., & Newman, J. (2005). An energy-driven social behaviour network architecture. In H. Czap, et al. (Eds.),Self-organization and automatic informatics(I) (pp. 77–85). ISO Press.

• Zadeh L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references