1. Agostini A, De Michelis G (2000) A light workflow management system using simple process definitions. Comput Support Coop Work 9(3/4):335–363

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Bowers J, Button G, Sharrock W (1995) Workflow from within and without: technology and cooperative work on the print industry shopfloor. In Marmolin H, Sundblad Y, Schmidt K, (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell, MA, USA, pp 51–66

3. Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: a multilevel perspective. MIS Q 31(4):657–679

   Google Scholar 

4. Casati F, Ceri S, Pernici B, Pozzi G (1998) Workflow Evolution. Data Knowl Eng 24(3):211–238

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Centefelli RT, Schwarz A (2011) Identifying and testing the inhibitors of technology usage intentions. Inf Syst Res 22(4):808–823

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Chin W (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling. MIS Q 22(1):7–16

   Google Scholar 

7. Cugola G (1998) Tolerating deviations in process support systems via flexible enactment of process models. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24(11):982–1001

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

   Google Scholar 

9. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Delone W, Mclean ER (2004) Measuring e-Commerce a success: applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. Int J Electron Commer 9(1):31–47

    Google Scholar 

11. Delone W, Mclean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):9–30

    Google Scholar 

12. De Waal B, Batenburg R (2009) Do users go with the new workflow? From user participation to quality of work during WFM deployment. In Alexander T, Turpin M, Van Deventer JP (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italy, 1–13

13. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. Br J Manag 17(4):263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer M (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Market Res 38(2):269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Dishaw MT, Strong DM (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Inf Manag 36(1):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Doherty NF, Perry I (2001) The cultural impact of workflow management systems in the financial services sector. Serv Ind J 21(4):147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Doll WJ, Xia W, Torkzadeh G (1994) Confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Q 18(4):453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Dourish P (2001) Process descriptions as organizational accounting devices: the dual use of workflow technologies. In Ellis C, Zigurs I (Eds.) Proceedings of the ACM international conference on supporting group work, ACM, New York, pp 52–60

19. Dumas M, Vander Aalst WMP, Terhofstede AHM (2005) Process aware information systems: bridging people and software through process technology. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

20. Ellis CA, Keddara K (2000) Ml-Dews: modeling language to support dynamic evolution within workow systems. Comput Support Coop Work 9(3/4):293–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Gable GG, Sedera D, Chan T (2008) Re-conceptualizing information system success: the IS-impact measurement model. J Assoc Inf Syst 9:377–408

    Google Scholar 

22. Georgakopoulos D, Hornick M, Sheth A (1995) An overview of workflow management: from process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distrib Parallel Databases 3(2):119–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Goodhue DL (1998) Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decis Sci 29(1):105–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Grefen P, Pernici B, Sanchez G (1999) Database support for workflow management: the WIDE project. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell

    Book  Google Scholar 

25. Grover V, Jeong SR (1995) The implementation of business process reengineering. J Manag Inf Syst 12(1):109–144

    Google Scholar 

26. Hair JF, Anderson R, Tatham RL, Black WC (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

27. Hammer M, Champy J (1993) Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Nicholas Brealey, London

    Google Scholar 

28. Heinl P, Horn S, Jablonski S, Neeb J, Stein K, Teschke M (1999) A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems. Software Eng Notes 24(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Market (AIM) 20:277–320

    Google Scholar 

30. Housel T, Bell A (2001) Managing and measuring knowledge. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

31. Ives B, Olson MH, Baroudi JJ (1983) The measurement of user information satisfaction. Commun ACM 26(10):785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Jablonski S, Bussler C (1996) Workflow management: modeling concepts, architecture and implementation. International Thomson Computer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

33. Karagiannis D (1995) BPMS: business process management systems. ACM SIGOIS Bull 16(1):10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Kueng P, Hagen C (2007) The fruits of business process management: an experience report from a Swiss bank. Bus Process Manag J 13(4):477–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Kueng P, Hagen C (2004) Increased performance through business process management: an experience report from a Swiss bank. In: Neely AD, Kennerley MP, Walters AH (eds) Performance measurement and management—public and private. Cranfield University, Cranfield, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

36. Landrum H, Prybutok VR, Strutton D, Zhang X (2008) Examining the merits of usefulness versus use in an information service quality and information system success web-based model. Inf Resour Manag J 21(2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Leymann F, Roller D, Schmidt MT (2002) Web services and business process management. IBM Syst J 41(2):198–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Lin H-F (2007) Measuring online learning systems success: applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. CyberPsychol Behav 10(6):817–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Mahmood MA, Burn JM, Gemoets LA, Jacquez C (2000) Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52(4):751–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Morris MG, Venkatesh V, Ackerman PL (2005) Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior, Engineering Management. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 52(1):69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Nelson RR, Todd PA, Wixom BH (2005) Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. J Manag Inf Syst 21(4):199–235

    Google Scholar 

42. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

43. Pavlou PA, Housel TJ, Rodgers W, Jansen E (2005) Measuring the return on information technology: a knowledge-based approach for revenue allocation at the process and firm level. J Assoc Inf Syst 6(7):199–226

    Google Scholar 

44. Petter SDW, Delone W, Mclean E (2008) Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur J Inf Syst 17:236–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Petter SDW, Straub W, RAI A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in IS research. MIS Q 31(4):623–656

    Google Scholar 

46. Pinsonneault A, Kraemer KL (1993) Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment. J Manag Inf Syst 10(2):75–105

    Google Scholar 

47. Poelmans S (2002) Making workflow systems work: an investigation into the importance of task-appropriation fit, end-user support and other technological characteristics. Ph. D. Dissertation, Faculty of Economic and Business, KU Leuven

48. Rai A, Lang SS, Welker RB (2002) Assessing the validity of is success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inf Syst Resarch 13(1):50–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

49. Reijers HA, Heusinkveld S (2004) Business process management: attempted concepticide?. In Khosrow-Pour M (Ed.) Proceedings of the 14th information resources management conference on information systems, IDEA Group, Hershey, pp 128–131

50. Reijers HA, Poelmans S (2007) Re-configuring workflow management systems to facilitate a “smooth flow of work”. Int J Coop Inf Syst 15(2):155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub DW (2012) Editor’s comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Q 36(1):iii–xiv

    Google Scholar 

52. Ringle CM, Wende S, Will S (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg.http://www.smartpls.de

53. Seddon PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the Delone and McLean model of IS success. Inf Syst Res 8(3):240–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

54. Seen M, Rouse AC. Beaumont N (2007) Explaining and predicting information systems acceptance and success: an integrative model. In Hubert Österle H, Schelp J, Winter R (Eds.) Proceedings of the european conference on information systems conference proceedings, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, pp. 1356–1367

55. Segars AH, Grover V (1993) Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Q 17(4):517–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

56. Van Der Aalst WMP, Reijers HA, Weijters AJMM, Van Dongen BF, Alves De Medeiros AK, Song M, Verbeek HMW (2007) Business process mining: an industrial application. Inf Syst 32(5):713–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

57. Van Der Aalst WMP, Weske M, Grünbauer D (2005) Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data Knowl Eng 53(2):129–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

58. Van Der Aalst WMP, Van Hee KM (2002) Workflow Management: models, methods, and systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

59. Wang Y, Liao Y (2008) Assessing eGovernment systems success: a validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Gov Inf Q 25(4):717–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

60. Weber B, Sadiq S, Reichert M (2009) Beyond rigidity dynamic process lifecycle support: a survey on dynamic changes in process-aware information systems. Comput Sci Res Develop 23(2):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

61. Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf Syst Res 16(1):85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

62. Wu J-H, Wang Y-M (2006) Measuring KMS success: a respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Inf Manag 43:728–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

63. Wu I-L, Wu K-W (2005) A hybrid technology acceptance approach for exploring e-CRM adoption in organizations. Behav Inf Technol 24(4):303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references