• Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F.L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., et al.: GPT-4 technical report (2023).https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

• Alon, U., Brody, S., Levy, O., Yahav, E.: code2seq: generating sequences from structured representations of code. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’19). OpenReview, New Orleans, LA, USA (2019)

• Alizadeh, V., Kessentini, M.: Reducing interactive refactoring effort via clustering-based multi-objective search. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’18), pp. 464–474. ACM, Montpellier (2018).https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238217

• Alizadeh, V., Kessentini, M., Mkaouer, M.W., Cinnéide, M.Ó., Ouni, A., Cai, Y.: An interactive and dynamic search-based approach to software refactoring recommendations. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.46(9), 932–961 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2018.2872711

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Akın, F.K.: Awesome ChatGPT prompts (2024).https://github.com/f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts

• AlOmar, E.A., Mkaouer, M.W., Ouni, A.: Behind the intent of extract method refactoring: a systematic literature review. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2024).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2023.3345800

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Alizadeh, V., Ouali, M.A., Kessentini, M., Chater, M.: RefBot: intelligent software refactoring bot. In: Proceedings of the 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’19), pp. 823–834. IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA (2019).https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2019.00081

• AlOmar, E.A., Venkatakrishnan, A., Mkaouer, M.W., Newman, C.D., Ouni, A.: How to refactor this code? An exploratory study on developer-ChatGPT refactoring conversations. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’24), pp. 202–206. IEEE (2024).https://doi.org/10.1145/3643991.3645081

• Alon, U., Zilberstein, M., Levy, O., Yahav, E.: code2vec: learning distributed representations of code. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages 3(POPL), pp. 1–29 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1145/3291636

• Baqais, A.A.B., Alshayeb, M.: Automatic software refactoring: a systematic literature review. Softw. Qual. J.28(2), 459–502 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-019-09477-y

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., Wilie, B., Lovenia, H., Ji, Z., Yu, T., Chung, W., et al.: A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity (2023).arxiv: 2302.04023

• Bavota, G., De Lucia, A., Di Penta, M., Oliveto, R., Palomba, F.: An experimental investigation on the innate relationship between quality and refactoring. J. Syst. Softw.107, 1–14 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.024

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Bavota, G., De Lucia, A., Oliveto, R.: Identifying extract class refactoring opportunities using structural and semantic cohesion measures. J. Syst. Softw.84(3), 397–414 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.918

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Barbez, A., Khomh, F., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G.: Deep learning anti-patterns from code metrics history. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME’19), pp. 114–124. IEEE, Cleveland, OH, USA (2019).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00021

• Bavota, G., Oliveto, R., De Lucia, A., Antoniol, G., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G.: Playing with refactoring: identifying extract class opportunities through game theory. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM’10), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2010).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2010.5609739

• Charalampidou, S., Ampatzoglou, A., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Gkortzis, A., Avgeriou, P.: Identifying extract method refactoring opportunities based on functional relevance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.43(10), 954–974 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2016.2645572

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chouchen, M., Bessghaier, N., Begoug, M., Ouni, A., AlOmar, E.A., Mkaouer, M.W.: How do so ware developers use ChatGPT? An exploratory study on github pull requests. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’24), pp. 212–216. IEEE (2024).https://doi.org/10.1145/3643991.3645084

• Chang, S., Fosler-Lussier, E.: How to prompt LLMs for text-to-SQL: a study in zero-shot, single-domain, and cross-domain settings (2023).arxiv: 2305.11853

• Chen, T., Jiang, Y., Fan, F., Liu, B., Liu, H.: A position-aware approach to decomposing god classes. In: Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’24), pp. 129–140 (2024). IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1145/3691620.3694992

• Cui, D., Wang, S., Luo, Y., Li, X., Dai, J., Wang, L., Li, Q.: RMove: recommending move method refactoring opportunities using structural and semantic representations of code. In: Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME’22), pp. 281–292. IEEE, Limassol, Cyprus (2022).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME55016.2022.00033

• Dair.AI: Prompt Engineering Guide (2024).https://github.com/dair-ai/Prompt-Engineering-Guide/blob/main/guides/prompts-intro.md

• Dawes, J.: Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. Int. J. Mark. Res.50(1), 61–104 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Dilhara, M., Bellur, A., Bryksin, T., Dig, D.: Unprecedented code change automation: the fusion of LLMS and transformation by example. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE’24), pp. 631–653. ACM, Porto de Galinhas, Brazil (2024).https://doi.org/10.1145/3643755

• Desai, U., Bandyopadhyay, S., Tamilselvam, S.: Graph neural network to dilute outliers for refactoring monolith application. In: Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’21), vol. 35, pp. 72–80 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i1.16079

• Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT’19), pp. 4171–4186. ACL, Minneapolis, MN, USA (2019).https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/N19-1423

• Dig, D., Comertoglu, C., Marinov, D., Johnson, R.: Automated detection of refactorings in evolving components. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP’06), pp. 404–428. Springer, Nantes, France (2006).https://doi.org/10.1007/11785477_24

• Deo, S., Hinge, D., Chavan, O.S., Wang, Y.O., Mkaouer, M.W.: Analyzing developer-ChatGPT conversations for software refactoring: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’24), pp. 207–211 (2024). IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1145/3643991.3645082

• Dice, L.R.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology26(3), 297–302 (1945).https://doi.org/10.2307/1932409

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• DePalma, K., Miminoshvili, I., Henselder, C., Moss, K., AlOmar, E.A.: Exploring ChatGPT’s code refactoring capabilities: an empirical study. Expert Syst. Appl.249, 1–26 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123602

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Farmmamba: Hadoop HDFS.https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17322 (2024)

• Fontana, F.A., Caracciolo, A., Zanoni, M.: DPB: A benchmark for design pattern detection tools. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR’12), Szeged, Hungary, pp. 235–244. IEEE (2012).https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2012.32

• Fulop, L.J., Ferenc, R., Gyimóthy, T.: Towards a benchmark for evaluating design pattern miner tools. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR’08), pp. 143–152. IEEE, Athens, Greece (2008).https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493309

• Foster, S.R., Griswold, W.G., Lerner, S.: WitchDoctor: IDE support for real-time auto-completion of refactorings. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’12), pp. 222–232. IEEE, Zurich, Switzerland (2012).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227191

• Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull.76(5), 378–382 (1971).https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Falleri, J.-R., Morandat, F., Blanc, X., Martinez, M., Monperrus, M.: Fine-grained and accurate source code differencing. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’14), pp. 313–324. ACM, Vasteras, Sweden (2014).https://doi.org/10.1145/2642937.2642982

• Feitelson, D.G., Mizrahi, A., Noy, N., Shabat, A.B., Eliyahu, O., Sheffer, R.: How developers choose names. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.48(1), 37–52 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2976920

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1999)

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Fokaefs, M., Tsantalis, N., Chatzigeorgiou, A.: JDeodorant: identification and removal of feature envy bad smells. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM’07), pp. 519–520. IEEE, Paris, France (2007).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2007.4362679

• Fluri, B., Wursch, M., Pinzger, M., Gall, H.: Change distilling: tree differencing for fine-grained source code change extraction. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.33(11), 725–743 (2007).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2007.70731

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grund, F., Chowdhury, S.A., Bradley, N.C., Hall, B., Holmes, R.: CodeShovel: constructing method-level source code histories. In: Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’21), pp. 1510–1522. IEEE, Madrid, Spain (2021).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00135

• Guo, Q., Cao, J., Xie, X., Liu, S., Li, X., Chen, B., Peng, X.: Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in automated code refinement: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’24), pp. 1–13. ACM, Lisbon, Portugal (2024).https://doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3623306

• Ge, X., DuBose, Q.L., Murphy-Hill, E.: Reconciling manual and automatic refactoring. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’12), pp. 211–221. IEEE, Zurich, Switzerland (2012).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227192

• Grissom, R.J., Kim, J.J.: Effect Sizes for Research: A Broad Practical Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (2005)

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Google: Gemini Model (2024).https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/learn/models

• JetBrains: IntelliJ IDEA Refactoring Meun (2024).https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/refactoring-source-code.html

• Kniesel, G., Binun, A.: Standing on the shoulders of giants—a data fusion approach to design pattern detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 17th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC’09), pp. 208–217. IEEE, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2009).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2009.5090044

• Kim, M., Gee, M., Loh, A., Rachatasumrit, N.: Ref-Finder: A refactoring reconstruction tool based on logic query templates. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE’10), pp. 371–372. ACM, Santa Fe, NM, USA (2010).https://doi.org/10.1145/1882291.1882353

• Kurbatova, Z., Veselov, I., Golubev, Y., Bryksin, T.: Recommendation of move method refactoring using path-based representation of code. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops (IWoR’20), pp. 315–322. ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea (2020).https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392191

• Liu, H., Guo, X., Shao, W.: Monitor-based instant software refactoring. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.39(8), 1112–1126 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2013.4

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., et al.: Summary of ChatGPT-related research and perspective towards the future of large language models. Meta-Radiology1(2), 1–14 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100017

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Liu, B.: ReExtractor (2024).https://github.com/lyoubo/ReExtractor

• Liu, B.: Replication Package (2024).https://github.com/bitselab/LLM4Refactoring

• Liu, H., Jin, J., Xu, Z., Zou, Y., Bu, Y., Zhang, L.: Deep learning based code smell detection. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.47(9), 1811–1837 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2936376

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu, K., Kim, D., Bissyandé, T.F., Kim, T., Kim, K., Koyuncu, A., Kim, S., Le Traon, Y.: Learning to spot and refactor inconsistent method names. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’19), pp. 1–12. IEEE, Montreal, QC, Canada (2019).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00019

• Liu, B., Liu, H., Li, G., Niu, N., Xu, Z., Wang, Y., Xia, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y.: Deep learning based feature envy detection boosted by real-world examples. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE’23), pp. 908–920. ACM, San Francisco, CA, USA (2023).https://doi.org/10.1145/3611643.3616353

• Liu, H., Liu, Q., Liu, Y., Wang, Z.: Identifying renaming opportunities by expanding conducted rename refactorings. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.41(9), 887–900 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2015.2427831

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Liu, B., Liu, H., Niu, N., Zhang, Y., Li, G., Jiang, Y.: Automated software entity matching between successive versions. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’23), pp. 1615–1627. IEEE, Luxembourg, Luxembourg (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00132

• Lacerda, G., Petrillo, F., Pimenta, M., Guéhéneuc, Y.G.: Code smells and refactoring: a tertiary systematic review of challenges and observations. J. Syst. Softw.167, 110610 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110610

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu, H., Wang, Y., Wei, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Li, H., Ji, R.: RefBERT: a two-stage pre-trained framework for automatic rename refactoring. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA’23), pp. 740–752. ACM, Seattle, WA, USA (2023).https://doi.org/10.1145/3597926.3598092

• Murphy-Hill, E., Parnin, C., Black, A.P.: How we refactor, and how we know it. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.38(1), 5–18 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2011.41

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mkaouer, M.W., Kessentini, M., Cinnéide, M.Ó., Hayashi, S., Deb, K.: A robust multi-objective approach to balance severity and importance of refactoring opportunities. Empir. Softw. Eng.22, 894–927 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9426-8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Minna, F., Massacci, F., Tuma, K.: Analyzing and Mitigating (with LLMs) the Security Misconfigurations of Helm Charts from Artifact Hub (2024).https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09537

• Mu, F., Shi, L., Wang, S., Yu, Z., Zhang, B., Wang, C., Liu, S., Wang, Q.: ClarifyGPT: empowering LLM-based code generation with intention clarification (2023).https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10996

• Mens, T., Tourwé, T.: A survey of software refactoring. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.30(2), 126–139 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2004.1265817

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Negara, S., Chen, N., Vakilian, M., Johnson, R.E., Dig, D.: A comparative study of manual and automated refactorings. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP’13), pp. 552–576. Springer, Berlin (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39038-8_23

• OpenAI: ChatGPT (2024).https://openai.com/index/chatgpt

• OpenAI: GPT-4 Model (2024).https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4-and-gpt-4-turbo

• Pomian, D., Bellur, A., Dilhara, M., Kurbatova, Z., Bogomolov, E., Bryksin, T., Dig, D.: Together We Go Further: LLMs and IDE Static Analysis for Extract Method Refactoring (2024).arxiv: 2401.15298

• Pomian, D., Bellur, A., Dilhara, M., Kurbatova, Z., Bogomolov, E., Sokolov, A., Bryksin, T., Dig, D.: EM-Assist: safe automated extract method refactoring with LLMs. In: Companion Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE’24’), pp. 582–586. ACM (2024).https://doi.org/10.1145/3663529.3663803

• PMD: PMD (2024).https://github.com/pmd/pmd

• Peruma, A., Mkaouer, M.W., Decker, M.J., Newman, C.D.: An empirical investigation of how and why developers rename identifiers. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Refactoring (IWoR’18’), pp. 26–33. ACM (2018).https://doi.org/10.1145/3242163.3242169

• Prete, K., Rachatasumrit, N., Sudan, N., Kim, M.: Template-based reconstruction of complex refactorings. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM’10), pp. 1–10. IEEE, Timisoara, Romania (2010).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2010.5609577

• Peruma, A., Simmons, S., AlOmar, E.A., Newman, C.D., Mkaouer, M.W., Ouni, A.: How do I refactor this? An empirical study on refactoring trends and topics in Stack Overflow. Empir. Softw. Eng.27(11), 1–43 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10045-x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., Liu, P.J.: Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res.21(1), 5485–5551 (2020).https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/N19-1423

  Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Silva, D., Silva, J.P., Santos, G., Terra, R., Valente, M.T.: RefDiff 2.0: A multi-language refactoring detection tool. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.47(12), 2786–2802 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2968072

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Shirafuji, A., Oda, Y., Suzuki, J., Morishita, M., Watanobe, Y.: Refactoring programs using large language models with few-shot examples. In: Proceedings of the 30th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC’23), pp. 151–160. IEEE (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC60848.2023.00025

• Silva, D., Tsantalis, N., Valente, M.T.: Why we refactor? Confessions of GitHub contributors. In: Proceedings of the 2016 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE’16), pp. 858–870. ACM, Seattle WA USA (2016).https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2950305

• Silva, D., Valente, M.T.: RefDiff: detecting refactorings in version histories. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR’17), pp. 269–279. IEEE (2017).https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2017.14

• Team, G., Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Wu, Y., Alayrac, J.-B., Yu, J., Soricut, R., Schalkwyk, J., Dai, A.M., Hauth, A., et al.: Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models (2023).arXiv. 2312.11805

• Tate, R.F.: Correlation between a discrete and a continuous variable, point-biserial correlation. Ann. Math. Stat.25(3), 603–607 (1954).https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728730

  Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

• Tsantalis, N., Chatzigeorgiou, A.: Identification of move method refactoring opportunities. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.35(3), 347–367 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2009.1

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Tsantalis, N., Chatzigeorgiou, A.: Identification of extract method refactoring opportunities for the decomposition of methods. J. Syst. Softw.84(10), 1757–1782 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.016

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Tsantalis, N., Chaikalis, T., Chatzigeorgiou, A.: JDeodorant: Identification and removal of type-checking bad smells. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR’08), pp. 329–331. IEEE, Athens, Greece (2008).https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493342

• Tsantalis, N., Ketkar, A., Dig, D.: RefactoringMiner 2.0. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.48(3), 930–950 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.3007722

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tourwé, T., Mens, T.: Identifying refactoring opportunities using logic meta programming. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR’03), pp. 91–100. IEEE, Benevento, Italy (2003).https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2003.1192416

• Tsantalis, N., Mansouri, M., Eshkevari, L.M., Mazinanian, D., Dig, D.: Accurate and efficient refactoring detection in commit history. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’18), pp. 483–494. ACM, Gothenburg, Sweden (2018).https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180206

• Tufano, R., Mastropaolo, A., Pepe, F., Dabić, O., Di Penta, M., Bavota, G.: Unveiling ChatGPT’s usage in open source projects: A mining-based study. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR ’24), pp. 571–583. IEEE (2024).https://doi.org/10.1145/3643991.3644918

• Tufano, M., Pantiuchina, J., Watson, C., Bavota, G., Poshyvanyk, D.: On learning meaningful code changes via neural machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’19), pp. 25–36. IEEE, Montreal, QC, Canada (2019).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00021

• Vitale, A., Piantadosi, V., Scalabrino, S., Oliveto, R.: Using deep learning to automatically improve code readability. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE’23), pp. 573–584. IEEE, Luxembourg, Luxembourg (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00112

• White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., Elnashar, A., Spencer-Smith, J., Schmidt, D.C.: A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT (2023).https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11382

• White, J., Hays, S., Fu, Q., Spencer-Smith, J., Schmidt, D.C.: ChatGPT prompt patterns for improving code quality, refactoring, requirements elicitation, and software design, pp. 71–108 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55642-5_4

• Wilcoxon, F.: Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Int. Biomet. Soc.1(6), 80–83 (1945).https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Wu, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, J.M., Papadakis, M., Harman, M., Liu, Y.: Large language models in fault localisation (2023).https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15276

• Xing, Z., Stroulia, E.: The JDEvAn tool suite in support of object-oriented evolutionary development. In: Companion of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE Companion’08), pp. 951–952. ACM, Leipzig, Germany (2008).https://doi.org/10.1145/1370175.1370203

• Xia, C.S., Zhang, L.: Keep the Conversation Going: Fixing 162 out of 337 bugs for \$0.42 each using ChatGPT (2023).arxiv. 2304.00385

• Yaron: TestMe (2024).https://github.com/wrdv/testme-idea

• Yamashita, A., Moonen, L.: Do developers care about code smells? An exploratory survey. In: Proceedings of the 20th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE’13), pp. 242–251. IEEE (2013).https://doi.org/10.1109/WCRE.2013.6671299

• Zhang, J., Luo, J., Liang, J., Gong, L., Huang, Z.: An accurate identifier renaming prediction and suggestion approach. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.32(6), 1–51 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1145/3603109

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references