Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Optimal tuning of FOPID controller for higher order process using hybrid approach

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an optimal tuning of fractional order proportional integral derivative (FOPID) controller for higher order process using hybrid approach. The proposed hybrid approach is the joint execution of Dynamic Differential Annealed Optimization (DDAO) and Feedback Artificial tree (FAT) algorithm, hence it is named D2AOFAT approach. The FOPID controller parameters likekp,ki,kd, λ andμ. The FOPID controller parameters errors are minimized and predict the optimal parameters by the FAT algorithm. Based on FOPID controller parameters using FAT algorithm, the DDAO optimizes the FOPID controller parameters. The FOPID controller advantage is adjusted to accomplish that needed responses that are resolute with FAT theory and RDF parameters are predictable using DDAO technique. The purpose of the proposed control system is selected in light of the achieved parameters of time delay system (TDS). The proposed technique is carried out in MATLAB / Simulink, its performance is compared to the existing techniques, like Ziegler-Nichols fit, Curve Fit, Wang method, and IWLQR method.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not apply to this article because no new data were developed or investigated in this study.

Code availability

None.

Abbreviations

RDFA:

Random Decision Forest Algorithm.

ACFO:

Advanced Cuttlefish Optimizer.

ACORDF:

Advanced Cuttlefish Optimizer and Random Decision Forest.

ZN:

Ziegler-Nichols.

CF:

Curve Fitting.

FOPI:

Fractional Order Proportional Integral.

NMSS:

Non-minimal State Space.

PFC:

Predictive Functional Control.

FC:

Fractional-Order.

CFA:

Cuttlefish algorithm.

FAT:

Feedback Artificial tree.

OOB:

Out of Bag.

NMSS-FOPFC:

Non-minimal state space Predictive functional control Fractional-order.

PSO:

Particle Swarm Optimization.

FOPID:

Fractional order proportional-integrator-derivative.

IAE:

Integral absolute error.

ITAE:

Integral time absolute error.

ITSE:

Integral time squared error.

SMC:

Sliding mode control.

PV:

Process variable.

RMSE:

Root mean square error.

DDAO:

Dynamic Differential Annealed Optimization.

References

  1. Alamdar Ravari M, Yaghoobi M (2019) Optimum design of fractional order pid controller using chaotic firefly algorithms for a control CSTR system. Asian J Control 21(5):2245–2255

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Azar AT, Serrano FE. (2018) Fractional order sliding mode PID controller/observer for continuous nonlinear switched systems with PSO parameter tuning. In International conference on advanced machine learning technologies and applications, 22:13–22

  3. Mythili S, Thiyagarajah K, Rajesh P, Shajin FH (2020) Ideal position and size selection of unified power flow controllers (UPFCs) to upgrade the dynamic stability of systems: an antlion optimiser and invasive weed optimisation algorithm. HKIE Trans 27(1):25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu L, Zhang S, Xue D, Chen Y (2018) General robustness analysis and robust fractional-order PD controller design for fractional-order plants. IET Control Theory Appl 12:1730–1736

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajesh P, Shajin F. (2020) A Multi-Objective Hybrid Algorithm for Planning Electrical Distribution System. 22(4–5):224–509

  6. Bhimte R, Bhole K, Shah P. (2018) Fractional Order Fuzzy PID Controller for a Rotary Servo System. 2018 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics 538–542

  7. MohammadiAsl R, Pourabdollah E, SalmaniM. (2017) Optimal fractional order PID for a robotic manipulator using colliding bodies design. Soft Comput 22:4647–4659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shajin FH, Rajesh P (2020). Trusted secure geographic routing protocol: outsider attack detection in mobile ad hoc networks by adopting trusted secure geographic routing protocol. Int J Pervasive Comp Commun

  9. Chen K, Tang R, Li C, Lu J (2018) Fractional order PI λ controller synthesis for steam turbine speed governing systems. ISA Trans 77:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thota MK, Shajin FH, Rajesh P (2020) Survey on software defect prediction techniques. Int J Appl Sci Eng 17(4):331–344

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sumathi R, Umasankar P (2018) Optimal design of fractional order PID controller for time-delay systems: an IWLQR technique. Int J Gen Syst 47:714–730

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahul D, Anwar M. (2018) Design of Fractional Order Pi Controller for First Order Plus Dead Time Process Based on Maximum Sensitivity. 2018 2nd International Conference on Power, Energy and Environment: Towards Smart Technology 1–6

  13. Dabiri A, Moghaddam B, Machado J (2018) Optimal variable-order fractional PID controllers for dynamical systems. J Comput Appl Math 339:40–48

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kommula BN, Kota VR. (2016) Mathematical modeling and fuzzy logic control of a brushless DC motor employed in automobile and industrial applications. In2016 IEEE First International Conference on Control, measurement and Instrumentation (CMI), 1–5. IEEE

  15. Kumar A, Kumar V (2018) Performance analysis of optimal hybrid novel interval type-2 fractional order fuzzy logic controllers for fractional order systems. Expert Syst Appl 93:435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li D, Liu L, Jin Q, Hirasawa K (2015) Maximum sensitivity based fractional IMC–PID controller design for non-integer order system with time delay. J Process Control 31:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu L, Pan F, Xue D (2015) Variable-order fuzzy fractional PID controller. ISA Trans 55:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leena J, Sundaravadivu K, Monisha R, Rajinikanth V. (2018) Design of Fractional-Order PI/PID Controller for SISO System Using Social-Group-Optimization. 2018 IEEE International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking 1–5

  19. Zeng G, Chen J, Dai Y, Li L, Zheng C, Chen M (2015) Design of fractional order PID controller for automatic regulator voltage system based on multi-objective extremal optimization. Neurocomputing 160:173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Senberber H, Bagis A (2017) Fractional PID controller design for fractional order systems using ABC algorithm. Electronics 2017:1–7

  21. Li M, Zhou P, Zhao Z, Zhang J (2016) Two-degree-of-freedom fractional order-PID controllers design for fractional order processes with dead-time. ISA Trans 61:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Swain S, Sain S, Mishra S, Ghosh S (2017) Real time implementation of fractional order PID controllers for a magnetic levitation plant. AEU Int J Electron Commun 78:141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zamani A, Tavakoli S, Etedali S (2017) Fractional order PID control design for semi-active control of smart base-isolated structures: a multi-objective cuckoo search approach. ISA Trans 67:222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandic P, Sekara T, Lazarevic M, Boskovic M (2017) Dominant pole placement with fractional order PID controllers: D-decomposition approach. ISA Trans 67:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moattari M, Moradi MH (2020) Conflict monitoring optimization heuristic inspired by brain fear and conflict systems. Int J Artif Intell 18(1):45–62

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bingul Z, Karahan O (2018) Comparison of PID and FOPID controllers tuned by PSO and ABC algorithms for unstable and integrating systems with time delay. Optim Control Appl Methods 39:1431–1450

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Yumuk E, Güzelkaya M, Eksin I. (2019) Analytical fractional PID controller design based on Bode’s ideal transfer function plus time delay. ISA Transactions

  28. Şenol B, Demiroğlu U (2019) Frequency frame approach on loop shaping of first order plus time delay systems using fractional order PI controller. ISA Trans 86:192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanatizadeh M, Bigdeli N. (2019) The design of NMSS fractional-order predictive functional controller for unstable systems with time delay. ISA Transactions

  30. Pradhan R, Pradhan S, Pati B (2018) Design and performance evaluation of fractional order PID controller for heat flow system using particle swarm optimization. Adv Intell Syst Comp 711:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chevalier A, Francis C, Copot C, Ionescu C, De Keyser R (2019) Fractional-order PID design: towards transition from state-of-art to state-of-use. ISA Trans 84:178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Choudhary N, Sivaramakrishnan J, Kar I. (2018) Sliding mode control of uncertain fractional order systems with delay. Int J Control 1–10

  33. Gao Z (2019) Analytical method on stabilisation of fractional-order plants with interval uncertainties using fractional-order PIλDμ controllers. Int J Syst Sci 50:935–953

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Baviskar SM, Shah P, Agashe SD (2014) Tuning of fractional PID controllers for higher order systems. Int J Appl Eng Res 9(11):1581–1590

    Google Scholar 

  35. Das S, Pan I, Das S (2013) Performance comparison of optimal fractional order hybrid fuzzy PID controllers for handling oscillatory fractional order processes with dead time. ISA Trans 52(4):550–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen SM, Han WH (2019) Multi attribute decision making based on nonlinear programming methodology, particle swarm optimization techniques and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf Sci 471:252–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Precup, R. E, David, R. C, Roman, R. C, Szedlak-Stinean, A. I, Petriu, E. M. (2021). Optimal tuning of interval type-2 fuzzy controllers for nonlinear servo systems using Slime Mould Algorithm. Int J Syst Sci, 1–16

  38. Li QQ, He ZC, Li E. (2020) The feedback artificial tree (FAT) algorithm. Soft Comp. 1–28

  39. Ghafil HN, Jármai K (2020) Dynamic differential annealed optimization: new metaheuristic optimization algorithm for engineering applications. Appl Soft Comput 93:106392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bettayeb M, Mansouri R, Al-Saggaf U, Mehedi I (2016) Smith predictor based fractional-order-filter PID controllers Design for Long Time Delay Systems. Asian J Contro l19:587–598

    MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Pan I, Das S (2015) Fractional-order load-frequency control of interconnected power systems using chaotic multi-objective optimization. Appl Soft Comput 29:328–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. PanI DS, Gupta A (2011) Tuning of an optimal fuzzy PID controller with stochastic algorithms for networked control systems with random time delay. ISATransactions 50:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pradhan R, Pati B (2019) Comparative performance evaluation of fractional order PID controller for heat flow system using evolutionary algorithms. Int J Appl Metaheuristic Comp 10:68–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sumathi R, Umasankar P (2020) New opposition cuttlefish optimizer based two-step approach for optimal design of fractional order proportional integral derivative controller for time delay systems. Int J Numer Model: Elect Netw Devices Fields 33(2):e2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Electronics and Instrumentation, Mount Zion College of Engineering, Kadammanitta, Kerala, India

    Thomas George

  2. Department of Electrical and Telecommunication Engineering, Sathyabama University, Chennai, India

    V. Ganesan

Authors
  1. Thomas George

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Ganesan

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toThomas George.

Ethics declarations

The authors state that they have no competitive financial interests or personal relationships that can have an impact on the work reported in this paper.

Conflict of interest

Authors state that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not have any investigations with human participants performed by any authors.

Consent to participate

None.

Consent for publication

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp