- Rogier van de Wetering MSc1,2,
- Ronald Batenburg Ph.D.1,
- Johan Versendaal Ph.D.1,
- Reeva Lederman BA MIS2 &
- …
- Lucy Firth Ph.D.2
655Accesses
29Citations
Around the world, hospitals are faced with both budget and regulatory pressures, forcing them to re-examine the way clinical practice is carried out. Proposed technologies that provide workflow enhancements include Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS); however, is PACS really effective in improving hospital workflow and the flow onto patient care, and how should this be evaluated? An acknowledged and successful approach for organizational evaluation is the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), providing the fundamental features for assessing organizations from various perspectives. In this research, the impact of PACS on the workflow of a large public hospital in Melbourne, Australia, is examined using an adapted version of the BSC. Empirically, this model was applied as an evaluation instrument through a series of in-depth interviews with PACS users. Results show that PACS did improve hospital workflow considerably and that the organizational alignment of PACS in hospitals is an important critical success factor.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brailer DJ (2004) Translating ideals for health information technology into practice. A three-tier architecture to help standards for health information technology gain acceptance and widespread use. Health Aff (Millwood), DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.W4.318, May 25, 2004
A Goldszal MH Bleshman RN Bryan (2004)ArticleTitleFinancing a large-scale picture archival and communication systemAcad Radiol11 96–102OccurrenceHandle14746408OccurrenceHandle10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00544-0
HK Huang (2003)ArticleTitleEnterprise PACS and image distributionComput Med Imaging Graph27 241–253OccurrenceHandle12620314OccurrenceHandle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXltFCqsLg%3DOccurrenceHandle10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00078-2
EL Siegel B Reiner (2003)ArticleTitleWork flow redesign: the key to success when using PACSJ Digit Imaging16IssueID1 164–168OccurrenceHandle12945824OccurrenceHandle10.1007/s10278-002-6006-9
EL Siegel B Reiner (2003)ArticleTitleFilmless radiology at the Baltimore VA Medical Center: a 9 year retrospectiveComput Med Imaging Graph27 101–109OccurrenceHandle12620300OccurrenceHandle10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00083-6
GD Laet J Naudts J Vandevivere (2001)ArticleTitleWorkflow in nuclear medicineComput Med Imaging Graph25 195–199OccurrenceHandle11137796OccurrenceHandle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7jtleitw%3D%3DOccurrenceHandle10.1016/S0895-6111(00)00048-3
J Watkins G Weatherburn SS Bryan (2000)ArticleTitleThe impact of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) upon an intensive care unitEur J Radiol34 3–8OccurrenceHandle10802202OccurrenceHandle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgtlyisg%3D%3DOccurrenceHandle10.1016/S0720-048X(00)00154-6
J Watkins (1999)ArticleTitleA Hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith HospitalEur J Radiol32 106–112OccurrenceHandle10628417OccurrenceHandle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FptF2qug%3D%3DOccurrenceHandle10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00134-5
Ahovuo J, Tolkki O, Fyhr N, Kujala J: Process oriented organisation in the regional PACS environment. EuroPACS-MIR 2004 in the Enlarged Europe, pp. 481-484, 2004
RO Redfern CP Langlotz SB Abbuhl M Polansky SC Horii H Kundel (2002)ArticleTitleThe effect of PACS on time required for technologist to produce radiographic images in the Emergency Department Radiology suiteJ Digit Imaging15IssueID3 153–160OccurrenceHandle12415466OccurrenceHandle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7isVWjtg%3D%3DOccurrenceHandle10.1007/s10278-002-0024-5
K Andriole (2002)ArticleTitleProductivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinationsJ Digit Imaging15IssueID3 161–169OccurrenceHandle12532253OccurrenceHandle10.1007/s10278-002-0026-3
LH Vogel (2003)ArticleTitleFinding value from IT investments: exploring the elusive ROI in healthcareJ Healthc Inf Manag17IssueID4 20–28OccurrenceHandle14558368
RS Kaplan DP Norton (1996) The Balanced Scorecard—Translating Strategy into Action Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA
N Inamdar RS Kaplan K Reynolds (2002)ArticleTitleApplying the balanced scorecard in healthcare provider organizationsJ Healthc Manag47IssueID3 179–196OccurrenceHandle12055900
KE Voelker JS Rakich GR French (2001)ArticleTitleThe balanced scorecard in healthcare organizations: a performance measurement and strategic planning methodologyHosp Top79IssueID3 13–24OccurrenceHandle11794940OccurrenceHandle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FmvFegtg%3D%3DOccurrenceHandle10.1080/00185860109597908
JM Liedtka (1992)ArticleTitleFormulating hospital strategy: moving beyond a market mentalityHealth Care Manage Rev17 21–26OccurrenceHandle1548116OccurrenceHandle1:STN:280:DyaK387pt12qsw%3D%3D
MB Miles AM Huberman (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. An Expanded SourcebookEditionNumber2nd ed. SAGE Publications Thousand Oaks, CA
JC Henderson N Venkatraman (1993)ArticleTitleStrategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organisationsIBM Syst J32IssueID1 4–16OccurrenceHandle10.1147/sj.382.0472
CKS Tong KH Fung HK Huang KK Chan (2003)ArticleTitleImplementation of ISO17799 and BS7799 in picture archiving and communication system: local experience in implementation of BS7799 standardInt Congr Ser1256 311–318OccurrenceHandle10.1016/S0531-5131(03)00518-1
BJ Liu F Cao MZ Zhou G Mogel L Documet (2003)ArticleTitleTrends in PACS image storage and archiveComput Med Imaging Graph27 165–174OccurrenceHandle12620307OccurrenceHandle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7gsl2nsA%3D%3DOccurrenceHandle10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00090-3
Acknowledgments
This work was performed as a master thesis and we are thankful to the hospital and all the interviewees for their cooperation and for making this research a success.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Centrumgebouw Noord, Padualaan 14, De Uithof, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Rogier van de Wetering MSc, Ronald Batenburg Ph.D. & Johan Versendaal Ph.D.
Department of Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Level 4, 111 Barry Street, Carlton, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
Rogier van de Wetering MSc, Reeva Lederman BA MIS & Lucy Firth Ph.D.
- Rogier van de Wetering MSc
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Ronald Batenburg Ph.D.
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Johan Versendaal Ph.D.
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Reeva Lederman BA MIS
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Lucy Firth Ph.D.
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toRonald Batenburg Ph.D..
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van de Wetering, R., Batenburg, R., Versendaal, J.et al. A Balanced Evaluation Perspective: Picture Archiving and Communication System Impacts on Hospital Workflow.J Digit Imaging19 (Suppl 1), 10–17 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0628-2
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative