1703Accesses
10Citations
1Altmetric
1Mention
Abstract
According to the Search for Ideas in Associative Memory theory, ideas in a brainstorming session do not come one by one but rather in “trains of thought,” which are rapid accumulations of semantically related ideas. In order to visualize these trains of thought, we developed a brainwriting tabletop interface enabling users to link successive ideas together by means of graphical ropes. To test the effectiveness of this device, 48 participants (in groups of four) brainstormed for 20 min on the tabletop in one of two conditions: either with the train-of-thought interface (with graphical ropes), or without the ropes (control condition). The results show that visualizing the associations between ideas enabled the participants to produce longer trains of thought. We also assessed originality by collecting the unique ideas in the whole corpus of ideas produced by the different groups and observed that the train-of-thought condition produced more original ideas than the control one. One interpretation of this finding is that visualizing trains of thought increases cognitive stimulation, i.e., improves creativity by making others’ ideas more intelligible to the brainstorming partners, in comparison with the classical visualization of ideas as independent items.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shen C, Ryall K, Forlines C, Esenther A, Vernier F, Everitt K, Wu M, Wigdor D, Ringel Morris M, Hancock M, Tse E (2006) Informing the design of direct-touch tabletops. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26:56–66
Scott SD, Carpendale S (2006) Interacting with digital tabletops. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26:24–27
Hartmann B, Ringel Morris M, Benko H, Wilson AD (2010) Pictionaire: supporting collaborative design work by integrating physical and digital artifacts. In: CSCW’10 international conference on computer-supported cooperative work, 2010. ACM Press, pp 421–424
Hilliges O, Terrenghi L, Boring S, Kim D, Richter H, Butz A (2007) Designing for collaborative creative problem solving. In: C&C’07 international conference on creativity and cognition. ACM Press, pp 137–146
Streitz NA, Geißler J, Holmer T, Konomi S (1999) I-LAND, an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In: CHI’99 international conference on human factors in computing systems, 1999. ACM Press, pp 120–127
Warr A, O’Neill E (2006) Public social private design (PSPD). In: CHI’06 international conference on human factors in computing systems, 2006. ACM Press, pp 1499–1504
Buisine S, Besacier G, Aoussat A, Vernier F (2012) How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? Comput Hum Behav 28:49–59
Schmitt L, Buisine S, Chaboissier J, Aoussat A, Vernier F (2012) Dynamic tabletop interfaces for increasing creativity. Comput Hum Behav 28:1892–1901
Osborn AF (1953) Applied Imagination. Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons, Oxford, England
Dugosh KL, Paulus PB (2005) Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. J Exp Soc Psychol 41:313–320
Dugosh KL, Paulus PB, Roland EJ, Yang HC (2000) Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(5):722–735
Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HFM (2002) Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: exposure effects in an idea generation task. J Exp Soc Psychol 38:535–544
Bartis S, Szymanski K, Harkins SG (1988) Evaluation and performance: a two-edged knife. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 14:242–251
Harkins SG, Jackson JM (1985) The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 11(4):457–465
Michinov N, Primois C (2005) Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: new evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Comput Hum Behav 21:11–28
Paulus PB, Dzindolet MT (1993) Social influence processes in group brainstorming. J Pers Soc Psychol 64(4):575–586
Diehl M, Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. J Pers Soc Psychol 53(3):497–509
Heslin PA (2009) Better than brainstorming? Potential boundary conditions to brainwriting for idea generation in organizations. J Occup Organ Psychol 82:129–145
Paulus PB, Yang HC (2000) Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82:76–87
Harkins SG, Szymanski K (1988) Social loafing and self-evaluation with an objective standard. J Exp Soc Psychol 24:354–365
Karau SJ, Hart JW (1998) Group cohesiveness and social loafing: effect of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 2:185–191
Karau SJ, Williams KD (1993) Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:681–706
Serva MA, Fuller MA (1997) Preventing social loafing in the collaborative technology classroom. In: SIGCPR’97, 1997. ACM Press, pp 84–86
Woolley AN, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330:686–688
Brickner MA, Harkins SG, Ostrom TM (1986) Effects of personal involvement: thought-provoking implications for social loafing. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:763–769
Shepperd JA (1993) Productivity loss in performance groups: a motivation analysis. Psychol Bull 113:67–81
Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2006) How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10:186–213
Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HFM (2003) Production blocking and idea generation: does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? J Exp Soc Psychol 39:531–548
Stroebe W, Nijstad BA, Rietzschel EF (2010) Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: the evolution of a question. In: Zanna MP, Olson JM (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 43. Academic Press, New York, pp 157–203
Raaijmakers JGW, Shiffrin RM (1981) Search of associative memory. Psychol Rev 88:93–134
Rietzschel EF, Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2007) Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: the effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. J Exp Soc Psychol 43:933–946
Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol Rev 69:220–232
Dietz PH, Leigh D DiamondTouch (2001) A multi-user touch technology. In: UIST’01 international conference on user interface software and technology, 2001. ACM Press, pp 219–226
Shen C, Vernier F, Forlines C, Ringel M (2004) DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. In: CHI’04 international conference on human factors in computing systems, 2004. ACM Press, pp 167–174
Buisine S, Besacier G, Najm M, Aoussat A, Vernier F (2007) Computer-supported creativity: evaluation of a tabletop mind-map application. In: HCII’07 human computer interaction international, 2007. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, pp 22–31
Brandl P, Forlines C, Wigdor D, Haller M, Shen C (2008) Combining and measuring the benefits of bimanual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces. In: AVI’08 international conference on advanced visual interfaces, 2008. pp 154–161
Geyer F, Pfeil U, Budzinski J, Höchtl A, Reiterer H (2011) AffinityTable—a hybrid surface for supporting affinity diagramming. In: INTERACT’11 IFIP conference on human-computer interaction, 2011. Springer, pp 477–484
DeRosa DM, Smith CL, Hantula DA (2007) The medium matters: mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Comput Hum Behav 23:1549–1581
Gallupe RB, Bastianutti LM, Cooper WH (1991) Unblocking brainstorms. J Appl Psychol 76(1):137–142
McLaughlin Hymes C, Olson GM (1992) Unblocking brainstorming through the use of a simple group editor. In: CSCW’92 international conference on computer-supported cooperative work, 1992. ACM Press, pp 99–106
Valacich JS, Dennis AR, Connolly T (1994) Idea generation in computer-based groups: a new ending to an old story. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 57:448–467
Runco MA (2004) Creativity. Annu Rev Psychol 55:657–687
Torrance EP (1966) The torrance tests of creative thinking. Personnel Press, Princeton
Paulus PB, Kohn NW, Arditti LE, Korde RM (2013) Understanding the group size effect in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research 44:332–352
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Hayfa Tebourbi who designed the first version of the interface, Constant Touchard and Jean-Baptiste Dumay who participated in the experiment setup as well as Julien Nelson for his helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Arts et Métiers ParisTech, LCPI, 151 Bd Hopital, 75013, Paris, France
Amandine Afonso Jaco, Stéphanie Buisine, Jessy Barré & Améziane Aoussat
LIMSI-CNRS, BP 133, 91403, Orsay Cedex, France
Frédéric Vernier
- Amandine Afonso Jaco
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Stéphanie Buisine
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Jessy Barré
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Améziane Aoussat
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Frédéric Vernier
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toStéphanie Buisine.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afonso Jaco, A., Buisine, S., Barré, J.et al. Trains of thought on the tabletop: visualizing association of ideas improves creativity.Pers Ubiquit Comput18, 1159–1167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0726-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative