• Aypay A, Erdoğan M, Sözer MA (2007) Variation among schools on classroom practices in science based on timss-1999 in turkey. J Res Sci Teach 44(10):1417–1435

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Basto M, Pereira JM (2012) An SPSS R-menu for ordinal factor analysis. J Stat Softw 46(4):1–29

  Google Scholar 

• Bernaards C, Jennrich R (2012) GPArotation: GPA factor rotation. R package version 2012.3-1

• Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1(2):245–276

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chajewski M (2009) Rela: Item analysis package with standard errors. R package version 4.1

• Choi J, Peters M, Mueller RO (2010) Correlational analysis of ordinal data: from Pearsons r to Bayesian polychoric correlation. Asia Pac Educ Rev 11(4):459–466

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Conway JM, Huffcutt AI (2003) A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organ Res Methods 6(2):147–168

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cordeiro PMG, Figueira APC, da Silva JT, Matos L (2012) School motivation questionnaire for the portuguese population: structure and psychometric studies. Span J Psychol 15(3):1441–1455

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cotton S, McCann T, Gleeson J, Crisp K, Murphy B, Lubman D (2013) Coping strategies in carers of young people with a first episode of psychosis. Schizophr Res 146(1):118–124

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cudeck R, MacCallum RC (2007) Factor analysis at 100: historical developments and future directions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

  Google Scholar 

• Dunn JG, Dunn JC, McDonald K (2012) Domain-specific perfectionism in intercollegiate athletes: Relationships with perceived competence and perceived importance in sport and school. Psychol Sport Exerc 13(6):747–755

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC (1974) When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull 81(6):358

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Epskamp S, Cramer AO, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D (2012) Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Softw 48(4):1–18

  Google Scholar 

• Fox J (2007) Polycor: polychoric and polyserial correlations. R package version 0.7–8

• Gabriel R (1971) The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58(3):453–467

  Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Gilley WF, Uhlig GE (1993) Factor analysis and ordinal data. Education 114(2):258–264

  Google Scholar 

• Gorsuch RL (1990) Common factor analysis versus component analysis: some well and little known facts. Multivar Behav Res 25(1):33–39

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gorsuch RL (1997) Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis. J Personal Assess 68(3):532–560

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greenacre MJ (2010) Biplots in practice. Fundacion BBVA/BBVA Foundation, Bilbao

  Google Scholar 

• Hakstian AR, Abell RA (1974) A further comparison of oblique factor transformation methods. Psychometrika 39(4):429–444

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Harman H, Jones W (1966) Factor analysis by minimizing residuals (minres). Psychometrika 31(3):351–368

  Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Harrington D (2009) Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Holgado-Tello FP, Chacón-Moscoso S, Barbero-García I, Vila-Abad E (2010) Polychoric versus pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Qual Quant 44(1):153–166

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Horn JL (1965) A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30(2):179–185

  Article  Google Scholar 

• IBM Corporation (2010) IBM SPSS Statistics 19. IBM Corporation, Armonk

• IBM Corporation (2012) IBM SPSS Modeler 15 User’s Guide. IBM Corporation, Armonk

• Jenkins EW, Nelson N (2005) Important but not for me: students attitudes towards secondary school science in england. Res Sci Technol Educ 23(1):41–57

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kaiser H (1958) The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23(3):187–200

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kaiser H (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):141–151

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kaiser HF (1974) A note on the equamax criterion. Multivar Behav Res 9(4):501–503

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Khodadady E, Ghallasi Fakhrabadi Z et al (2012) Designing and validating a comprehensive scale of english language teachers attributes and establishing its relationship with achievement. Am J Sci Res 82(12):113–125

  Google Scholar 

• Klinke S, Wagner C (2008) Visualizing exploratory factor analysis models. In: Paulo B (ed) Compstat 2008: proceedings in computational statistics : 18th symposium held in Porto, Portugal

• Kolence KW, Kiviat PJ (1973) Software unit profiles & kiviat figures. SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 2(3):2–12

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lance CE, Butts MM, Michels LC (2006) The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria what did they really say? Organ Res Methods 9(2):202–220

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lawley DN (1940) The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood. Proc R Soc Edinb 60(2):64–82

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Manukyan A, Demir I, Sedef A (2011) A new graphical approach to exploratory factor analysis. In: Papanikos GT (ed) Abstract book for the 5th annual international conference on mathematics, statistics & mathematical education, Greece, Athens 13–16 June 2011

• Manukyan A, Sedef A, Cene E, Demir I (2012) DandEFA: Dandelion plot for R-mode exploratory factor analysis. R package version 1.5

• Martin MO, Mullis IV, Foy P, Stanco GM (2012) TIMSS 2011 international results in science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Boston

• Misaki M, Wallace GL, Dankner N, Martin A, Bandettini PA (2012) Characteristic cortical thickness patterns in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: interactions with age and intellectual ability revealed by canonical correlation analysis. NeuroImage 60(3):1890–1901

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Neuhauss J, Wrigley C (1954) The quartimax method. Br J Stat Psychol 7(2):81–91

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Oconnor BP (2000) SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicers map test. Behav Res Methods Instr Comput 32(3):396–402

  Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Park M, Lee JW, Lee JB, Song SH (2008) Several biplot methods applied to gene expression data. J Stat Plan Inference 138(2):500–515

  Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM (2005) How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput Stat Data Anal 49(4):974–997

  Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.http://www.R-project.org/

• Revelle W (2014) Psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. R package version 1.4.2.3

• Revelle W, Rocklin T (1979) Very simple structure: an alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivar Behav Res 14(4):403–414

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reyment R, Joreskog KG (1993) Applied factor analysis in the natural sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Roberts LD, Allen PJ (2013) A brief measure of student perceptions of the educational value of research participation. Aust J Psychol 65(1):22–29

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Saldivia S, Torres-Gonzalez F, Runte-Geidel A, Xavier M, Grandon P, Antonioli C, Ballester D, Gibbons R, Melipillan R, Caldas J et al (2013) Standardization of the maristán scale of informal care in people with schizophrenia and other psychoses. Acta Psychiatr Scand 128(6):468–474

  Article  Google Scholar 

• SAS Institute Inc (2011) SAS/STAT software, Version 9.3. Cary, NC, USA.http://www.sas.com/

• SAS Institute Inc (2013) SAS Text Miner 13.1. Cary, NC, USA

• Selimović A, Tomić Selimović L (2012) Validation of existence of secondorder factors in Cattell’s 16pf personality inventory. Primenj Psihol 5(4):319–334

  Google Scholar 

• Shen C (2002) Revisiting the relationship between students’ achievement and their self-perceptions: a cross-national analysis based on timss 1999 data. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract 9(2):161–184

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shen C, Pedulla JJ (2000) The relationship between students’ achievement and their self-perception of competence and rigour of mathematics and science: a cross-national analysis. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract 7(2):237–253

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sonmez M, Moorhouse A (2010) Purchasing professional services: which decision criteria? Manag Decis 48(2):189–206

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tahar NF, Ismail Z, Zamani ND, Adnan N (2010) Students attitude toward mathematics: the use of factor analysis in determining the criteria. Proced Soc Behav Sci 8:476–481

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Udina F (2005) Interactive biplot construction. J Stat Softw 13(5):1–16

  Google Scholar 

• Velicer WF (1976) Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika 41(3):321–327

  Article MATH  Google Scholar 

• Voudouris K, Lambrakis N, Papatheothorou G, Daskalaki P (1997) An application of factor analysis for the study of the hydrogeological conditions in Plio-Pleistocene aquifers of NW Achaia (NW Peloponnesus, Greece). Math Geol 29(1):43–59

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Warne RT, Lazo M, Ramos T, Ritter N (2012) Statistical methods used in gifted education journals, 2006–2010. Gifted Child Q 56(3):134–149

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Widaman KF (1993) Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivar Behav Res 28(3):263–311

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yan W, Hunt L, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci 40(3):597–605

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yidana SM, Ophori D, Banoeng-Yakubo B (2008) A multivariate statistical analysis of surface water chemistry datathe ankobra basin, Ghana. J Environ Manage 86(1):80–87

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zandi P, Shirani-Rad AH, Daneshian J, Bazrkar-Khatibani L (2011) Agronomic and morphologic analysis of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum l.) under nitrogen fertilizer and plant density via factor analysis. Afr J Agric Res 6(5):1134–1140

  Google Scholar 

• Zumbo BD, Gadermann AM, Zeisser C (2007) Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for likert rating scales. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 6(1):21–29

  Google Scholar 

• Zwick WR, Velicer WF (1986) Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bull 99(3):432

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references