1352Accesses
17Altmetric
2Mentions
Abstract
Applied behavioral psychology pivots on the formation and alteration of stimulus function: on how stimuli come to differentially affect behavior and how these effects can be altered when they prove problematic. Relational frame theory (RFT) offers an account of how uniquely verbal processes transform stimulus functions. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) was designed to counteract problematic verbal transformations of function, in part through the use of cognitive defusion techniques. But the construct of cognitive defusion remains incompletely understood. The current article comprises an attempt to explore parameters around the ways in which cognitive defusion are viewed and operationalized within ACT and RFT. A comprehensive RFT-based conceptualization of defusion is offered, and hypotheses about the nature of defusion and its effects are discussed, with the intent of spurring more focused empirical exploration on the characteristics and effects of defusion inside ACT and in a variety of mindfulnessbased psychotherapeutic treatments.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., & DYMOND, S. (2001). Self and selfdirected rules. In S. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.),Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 119–139). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
BARNES-HOLMES, D., Hayes, S. C., & Gregg, J. (2001). Religion, spirituality, and transcendence. In S. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.),Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 239–251). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., DYMOND, S., & O’HORA, D. (2001). Multiple stimulus relations and the transformation of stimulus functions. In S. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.),Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 51–72). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
BASSETT, D., & BLACKLEDGE, J. T. (2006). Instantiating defusion using observer perspective prompts. Unpublished manuscript.
BECK, A. T. (1970). Cognitive therapy: Nature and relation to behavior therapy.Behavior Therapy, 1, 184–200.
BLACKLEDGE, J. T. (2003). An introduction to relational frame theory: Basics and applications.The Behavior Analyst Today, 3, 421–433.
BLACKLEDGE, J. T., MORAN, D. J., & ELLIS, A. Bridging the divide: Linking basic experimental research to applied psychotherapeutic treatments—A relational frame theory analysis of rational-emotive behavior therapy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
HAYES, S. C. (1993). Analytic goals and the varieties of scientific contextualism. In S. Hayes, L. Hayes, H. Reese, & T. Sarbin (Eds.),Varieties of scientific contextualism (pp. 11–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001).Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
HAYES, S. C., BLACKLEDGE, J. T., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2001). Language and cognition: Constructing an alternative approach within the behavioral tradition. In S. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.),Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 51–72). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
HAYES, S. C., MASUDA, A., BISSETT, R., LUOMA, J. & GUERRERO, L. F. (2004). Dbt, Fap, and Act: How empirically oriented are the new behavior therapy technologies?Behavior Therapy, 35, 35–54.
HAYES, S. C., STROSAHL, K. D., BUNTING, K., TWOHIG, M., & WILSON, K. G. (2004). What is acceptance and commitment therapy? (pp. 1–30). In S. Hayes & K. Strosahl (Eds.),A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York: Springer.
HAYES, S. C., STROSAHL, K., & WILSON, K. G. (1999).Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.
HEALY, H., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., WILSON, K., LUCIANO, C., & KEOGH, C. (2006). An experimental analysis of cognitive defusion. Paper presented at the Second World Conference on Act, Rft, and Contextual Behavioural Science, London, England.
HOLLON, S. D., & BECK, A. T. (1979). “Cognitive therapy of depression.” In P. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures. New York: Academic Press.
KANTOR, J. R. (1938). The nature of psychology as a natural science.Acta Psychologica, 4, 1–61.
KEOGH, C., & BARNES-HOLMES, Y. (2006). An experimental analysis of cognitive defusion. Paper presented at the Second World Conference on Act, Rft, and Contextual Behavioural Science, London, England.
KOHLENBERG, R. J., & TSAI, M. (1991).Functional analytic psychotherapy: Creating intense and curative psychotherapeutic relationships (pp. 125–168). New York: Plenum Press.
LINEHAN, M. (2003).Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.
MASUDA, A., HAYES, S. C., SACKETT, C. F., & TWOHIG, M. P. (2004). Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: Examining the impact of a ninety-year-old technique.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 477–485.
MELIA, R., ROCHE, B., & BLACKLEDGE, J. (2006). Disrupting experiential avoidance: An experimental analogue of cognitive defusion. Paper presented at the Second World Conference on Act, Rft, and Contextual Behavioural Science, London, England.
PAVLOV, I. P. (1927).Conditioned reflex: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. London: Oxford University Press.
SEGAL, Z. V., WILLIAMS, M. G., & TEASDALE, J. D. (2001).Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach for preventing relapse. New York: Guilford.
SKINNER, B. F. (1991).The behavior of organisms. Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation. (Reprinted from 1938 edition)
SKINNER, B. F. (1957).Verbal behavior. Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation.
WILSON, K. G., & MURRELL, A. R. (2004). Values work in acceptance and commitment therapy: Setting a course for behavioral treatment (pp. 120–151). In S. Hayes, V. Follette, and M. Linehan (Eds.),Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York: Gilford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia
John T. Blackledge
- John T. Blackledge
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toJohn T. Blackledge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blackledge, J.T. Disrupting Verbal Processes: Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Other Mindfulness-Based Psychotherapies.Psychol Rec57, 555–576 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395595
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative