1. D. W. Bliss, P. A. Parker, and A. R. Margetts, “Simultaneous transmission and reception for improved wireless network performance,” inProc. 14th IEEE/SP Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing (SSP), Aug. 2007, pp. 478–482.

   Google Scholar 

2. M. Duarte and A. Sabharwal, “Full-duplex wireless communications using off-the-shelf radios: Feasibility and first results,” inProc. 44th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers (ASILOMAR), Nov. 2010, pp. 1558–1562.

   Google Scholar 

3. J. I. Choi, M. Jain, K. Srinivasan, P. Levis, and S. Katti, “Achieving single channel full duplex wireless communication,” inProc. 16th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Sep. 2010, pp. 1–12.

   Google Scholar 

4. Z. Zhang, K. Long, A. V. Vasilakos, and L. Hanzo, “Full-duplex wireless communications: Challenges, solutions, and future research directions,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 1369–1409, Jul. 2016.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. A. Sabharwal, P. Schniter, D. Guo, D. W. Bliss, S. Rangarajan, and R. Wichman, “In-band full-duplex wireless: Challenges and opportunities,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1637–1652, Sep. 2014.

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. D. Korpi, T. Riihonen, V. Syrjälä, L. Anttila, M. Valkama, and R. Wichman, “Full-duplex transceiver system calculations: analysis of ADC and linearity challenges,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 3821–3836, Jul. 2014.

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. L. Anttila, D. Korpi, V. Syrjälä, and M. Valkama, “Cancellation of power amplifier induced nonlinear self-interference in full-duplex transceivers,” inProc. 47th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), Nov. 2013, pp. 1193–1198.

   Google Scholar 

8. D. Korpi, M. Heino, C. Icheln, K. Haneda, and M. Valkama, “Compact inband full-duplex relays with beyond 100 dB self-interference suppression: Enabling techniques and field measurements,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 65, pp. 960–965, Feb. 2017.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. D. Korpi, J. Tamminen, M. Turunen, T. Huusari, Y.-S. Choi, L. Anttila, S. Talwar, and M. Valkama, “Full-duplex mobile device: Pushing the limits,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 80–87, Sep. 2016.

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. D. Korpi, “Full-duplex wireless: Self-interference modeling, digital cancellation, and system studies,” Ph.D. dissertation, Tampere University of Technology, Dec. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

11. D. Pozar,Microwave Engineering. Wiley, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

12. M. Jain, J. I. Choi, T. Kim, D. Bharadia, S. Seth, K. Srinivasan, P. Levis, S. Katti, and P. Sinha, “Practical, real-time, full duplex wireless,” inProc. 17th Annual International Conference on Mobile computing and Networking (MobiCom), Sep. 2011, pp. 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

13. D. Bharadia, E. McMilin, and S. Katti, “Full duplex radios,” inProc. SIGCOMM’13, Aug. 2013, pp. 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

14. V. Tapio, M. Juntti, A. Pärssinen, and K. Rikkinen, “Real time adaptive RF and digital self-interference cancellation for full-duplex transceivers,” inProc. 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), Nov. 2016, pp. 1558–1562.

    Google Scholar 

15. M. S. Amjad and O. Gurbuz, “Linear digital cancellation with reduced computational complexity for full-duplex radios,” inProc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Mar. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

16. W. Chung, D. Hong, R. Wichman, and T. Riihonen, “Interference cancellation architecture for full-duplex system with GFDM signaling,” inProc. 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Aug. 2016, pp. 788–792.

    Google Scholar 

17. M. Chung, M. S. Sim, J. Kim, D. K. Kim, and C. b. Chae, “Prototyping real-time full duplex radios,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 56–63, Sep. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

18. D. Wu, C. Zhang, S. Gao, and D. Chen, “A digital self-interference cancellation method for practical full-duplex radio,” inProc. IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC), Aug. 2014, pp. 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

19. M. S. Sim, M. Chung, D. K. Kim, and C. B. Chae, “Low-complexity nonlinear self-interference cancellation for full-duplex radios,” inProc. IEEE Globecom Workshops, Dec. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

20. A. C. M. Austin, A. Balatsoukas-Stimming, and A. Burg, “Digital predistortion of power amplifier non-linearities for full-duplex transceivers,” inProc. 17th IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Jul. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

21. E. Ahmed, A. M. Eltawil, and A. Sabharwal, “Self-interference cancellation with nonlinear distortion suppression for full-duplex systems,” inProc. 47th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), Nov. 2013, pp. 1199–1203.

    Google Scholar 

22. D. W. Bliss and Y. Rong, “Full-duplex self-interference mitigation performance in nonlinear channels,” inProc. 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), Nov. 2014, pp. 1696–1700.

    Google Scholar 

23. M. Emara, M. Faerber, L. G. Baltar, J. Nossek, and K. Roth, “Nonlinear digital self-interference cancellation with reduced complexity for full duplex systems,” inProc. International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas (WSA), Mar. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

24. Z. Luan, H. Qu, J. Zhao, and B. Chen, “Robust digital non-linear self-interference cancellation in full duplex radios with maximum correntropy criterion,”China Communications, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 53–59, Sep. 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. D. Korpi, Y.-S. Choi, T. Huusari, S. Anttila, L. Talwar, and M. Valkama, “Adaptive nonlinear digital self-interference cancellation for mobile inband full-duplex radio: algorithms and RF measurements,” inProc. IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

26. L. Anttila, D. Korpi, E. Antonio-Rodríguez, R. Wichman, and M. Valkama, “Modeling and efficient cancellation of nonlinear self-interference in MIMO full-duplex transceivers,” inProc. IEEE Globecom Workshops, Dec. 2014, pp. 862–868.

    Google Scholar 

27. D. Korpi, L. Anttila, and M. Valkama, “Asymmetric full-duplex with contiguous downlink carrier aggregation,” inProc. 17th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Jul. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

28. M. Heino, D. Korpi, T. Huusari, E. Antonio-Rodríguez, S. Venkatasubramanian, T. Riihonen, L. Anttila, C. Icheln, K. Haneda, R. Wichman, and M. Valkama, “Recent advances in antenna design and interference cancellation algorithms for in-band full-duplex relays,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 91–101, May 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. W. Zhao, C. Feng, F. Liu, C. Guo, and Y. Nie, “Polarization mismatch based self-interference cancellation against power amplifier nonlinear distortion in full duplex systems,” inProc. 26th Annual IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Aug. 2015, pp. 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

30. A. Balatsoukas-Stimming, “Non-linear digital self-interference cancellation for in-band full-duplex radios using neural networks,” inProc. IEEE 19th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Jun. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

31. Y. Kurzo, A. Burg, and A. Balatsoukas-Stimming, “Design and implementation of a neural network aided self-interference cancellation scheme for full-duplex radios,” inProc. 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Oct. 2018, pp. 589–593.

    Google Scholar 

32. H. Guo, J. Xu, S. Zhu, and S. Wu, “Realtime software defined self-interference cancellation based on machine learning for in-band full duplex wireless communications,” inProc. International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), Mar. 2018, pp. 779–783.

    Google Scholar 

33. M. Duarte, C. Dick, and A. Sabharwal, “Experiment-driven characterization of full-duplex wireless systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 4296–4307, Dec. 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. M. Duarte, A. Sabharwal, V. Aggarwal, R. Jana, K. Ramakrishnan, C. Rice, and N. Shankaranarayanan, “Design and characterization of a full-duplex multiantenna system for WiFi networks,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1160–1177, Mar. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. M. Duarte, “Full-duplex wireless: Design, implementation and characterization,” Ph.D. dissertation, Rice University, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

36. E. Everett, A. Sahai, and A. Sabharwal, “Passive self-interference suppression for full-duplex infrastructure nodes,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 680–694, Feb. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. D. Bharadia and S. Katti, “Full duplex MIMO radios,” inProc. 11th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), Apr. 2014, pp. 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

38. B. Debaillie, D. J. van den Broek, C. Lavín, B. van Liempd, E. A. M. Klumperink, C. Palacios, J. Craninckx, B. Nauta, and A. Pärssinen, “Analog/RF solutions enabling compact full-duplex radios,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1662–1673, Sep. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. M. Valkama, M. Renfors, and V. Koivunen, “Advanced methods for I/Q imbalance compensation in communication receivers,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2335–2344, Oct. 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. J. K. Cavers and M. W. Liao, “Adaptive compensation for imbalance and offset losses in direct conversion transceivers,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 581–588, Nov. 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. ETSI, “LTE; evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); user equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception (3GPP TS 36.101 version 14.3.0 release 14),” Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France, Jan. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

42. D. Korpi, L. Anttila, V. Syrjälä, and M. Valkama, “Widely linear digital self-interference cancellation in direct-conversion full-duplex transceiver,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1674–1687, Sep. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. S. Li and R. D. Murch, “An investigation into baseband techniques for single-channel full-duplex wireless communication systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 4794–4806, Sep. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Y. Rahmatallah and S. Mohan, “Peak-to-average power ratio reduction in OFDM systems: A survey and taxonomy,”IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1567–1592, Fourth Quarter 2013.

    Google Scholar 

45. T. Jiang and Y. Wu, “An overview: Peak-to-average power ratio reduction techniques for OFDM signals,”IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 257–268, Jun. 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. ETSI, “LTE; evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); base station (BS) radio transmission and reception (3GPP TS 36.104, version 14.3.0, release 14),” Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France, Mar. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

47. F. M. Ghannouchi and O. Hammi, “Behavioral modeling and predistortion,”IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 52–64, Dec. 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

48. F. M. Ghannouchi, “Power amplifier and transmitter architectures for software defined radio systems,”IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 56–63, Fourth Quarter 2010.

    Google Scholar 

49. D. Morgan, Z. Ma, J. Kim, M. Zierdt, and J. Pastalan, “A generalized memory polynomial model for digital predistortion of RF power amplifiers,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 3852–3860, Oct. 2006.

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

50. A. Abdelhafiz, A. Kwan, O. Hammi, and F. M. Ghannouchi, “Digital predistortion of LTE-A power amplifiers using compressed-sampling-based unstructured pruning of Volterra series,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2583–2593, Nov. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. A. S. Tehrani, H. Cao, S. Afsardoost, T. Eriksson, M. Isaksson, and C. Fager, “A comparative analysis of the complexity/accuracy tradeoff in power amplifier behavioral models,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1510–1520, Jun. 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

52. M. Schoukens, R. Pintelon, and Y. Rolain, “Parametric identification of parallel Hammerstein systems,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 3931–3938, Dec. 2011.

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

53. L. Ding, G. T. Zhou, D. R. Morgan, Z. Ma, J. S. Kenney, J. Kim, and C. R. Giardina, “A robust digital baseband predistorter constructed using memory polynomials,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 159–165, Jan. 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

54. M. Isaksson, D. Wisell, and D. Rönnow, “A comparative analysis of behavioral models for RF power amplifiers,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 348–359, Jan. 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

55. L. Anttila, P. Händel, and M. Valkama, “Joint mitigation of power amplifier and I/Q modulator impairments in broadband direct-conversion transmitters,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 730–739, Apr. 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

56. D. Korpi, M. Valkama, T. Riihonen, and R. Wichman, “Implementation challenges in full-duplex radio transceiver,” inProc. XXXIII Finnish URSI Convention on Radio Science, Apr. 2013, pp. 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

57. B. P. Day, A. R. Margetts, D. W. Bliss, and P. Schniter, “Full-duplex bidirectional MIMO: Achievable rates under limited dynamic range,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 3702–3713, Jul. 2012.

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

58. Q. Gu,RF System Design of Transceivers for Wireless Communications. Springer, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

59. V. Syrjälä, M. Valkama, L. Anttila, T. Riihonen, and D. Korpi, “Analysis of oscillator phase-noise effects on self-interference cancellation in full-duplex OFDM radio transceivers,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 2977–2990, Jun. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

60. A. Sahai, G. Patel, C. Dick, and A. Sabharwal, “On the impact of phase noise on active cancelation in wireless full-duplex,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 4494–4510, Nov. 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

61. T. Riihonen, P. Mathecken, and R. Wichman, “Effect of oscillator phase noise and processing delay in full-duplex OFDM repeaters,” inProc. 46th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), Nov. 2012, pp. 1947–1951.

    Google Scholar 

62. X. Quan, Y. Liu, S. Shao, C. Huang, and Y. Tang, “Impacts of phase noise on digital self-interference cancellation in full-duplex communications,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1881–1893, Apr. 2017.

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

63. A. Masmoudi and T. Le-Ngoc, “A maximum-likelihood channel estimator for self-interference cancelation in full-duplex systems,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 5122–5132, Jul. 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

64. V. Syrjälä, “Analysis and mitigation of oscillator impairments in modern receiver architectures,” Ph.D. dissertation, Tampere University of Technology, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

65. R. Durrett,Probability: Theory and Examples, 4th ed. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

    Book MATH  Google Scholar 

66. Q. Zou, A. Tarighat, and A. H. Sayed, “Compensation of phase noise in OFDM wireless systems,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 5407–5424, Nov. 2007.

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

67. D. Petrovic, W. Rave, and G. Fettweis, “Effects of phase noise on OFDM systems with and without PLL: Characterization and compensation,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1607–1616, Aug. 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

68. L. Tomba, “On the effect of Wiener phase noise in OFDM systems,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 580–583, May 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

69. D. Korpi, L. Anttila, and M. Valkama, “Impact of received signal on self-interference channel estimation and achievable rates in in-band full-duplex transceivers,” inProc. 48th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR), Nov. 2014, pp. 975–982.

    Google Scholar 

70. ——, “Nonlinear self-interference cancellation in MIMO full-duplex transceivers under crosstalk,”EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2017, no. 1, p. 24, Feb. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

71. D. Korpi, T. Riihonen, and M. Valkama, “Achievable rate regions and self-interference channel estimation in hybrid full-duplex/half-duplex radio links,” inProc. 49th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), Mar. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

72. D. Korpi, T. Riihonen, K. Haneda, K. Yamamoto, and M. Valkama, “Achievable transmission rates and self-interference channel estimation in hybrid full-duplex/half-duplex MIMO relaying,” inProc. 82nd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), Sep. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

73. S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing. Prentice Hall, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

74. S. Haykin,Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

75. ——,Adaptive Filter Theory, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

76. A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja,Independent Component Analysis. Wiley, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

77. D. Knuth,The Art of Computer Programming, 3rd ed. Addison–Wesley, 1997, vol. 1, Fundamental Algorithms.

    Google Scholar 

78. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,”IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, Apr. 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

79. S. Verdu, “Minimum probability of error for asynchronous Gaussian multiple-access channels,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 85–96, Jan. 1986.

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

80. D. Kivanc, G. Li, and H. Liu, “Computationally efficient bandwidth allocation and power control for OFDMA,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1150–1158, Nov. 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

81. T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein,Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd ed. MIT Press, 2009.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

82. Texas Instruments Incorporated, “CC2595 RF front-end transmit power amplifier for 2.4 GHz ISM band systems,” Dallas, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

83. J. Tamminen, M. Turunen, D. Korpi, T. Huusari, Y.-S. Choi, S. Talwar, and M. Valkama, “Digitally-controlled RF self-interference canceller for full-duplex radios,” inProc. 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Aug. 2016, pp. 783–787.

    Google Scholar 

84. M. Heino, S. Venkatasubramanian, C. Icheln, and K. Haneda, “Design of wavetraps for isolation improvement in compact in-band full-duplex relay antennas,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1061–1070, Mar. 2016.

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

85. Mini-Circuits, “ZVE-8G+ coaxial amplifier,” Brooklyn, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references