1. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S: Quantum entanglement in concept combinations. Int. J. Theor. Phys. ArXiv:1302.3831 [cs.AI] (2013)

   Google Scholar 

2. Bell, J.S.: On the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox. Physics1, 195–200 (1964)

   Google Scholar 

3. Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett.23, 880–884 (1969)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Aerts, D.: A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys.27, 202–210 (1986)

   Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

5. Accardi, L., Fedullo, A.: On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum theory. Lett. Nuovo Cim.34, 161–172 (1982)

   Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

6. Pitowsky, I.: Quantum Probability, Quantum Logic. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 321. Springer, Berlin (1989)

   MATH  Google Scholar 

7. Aerts, D.: Example of a macroscopical situation that violates bell inequalities. Lett. Nuovo Cim.34, 107–111 (1982)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Aerts, D.: The physical origin of the EPR paradox and how to violate bell inequalities by macroscopical systems. In: Lathi, P., Mittelstaedt, P. (eds.) Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics: 50 Years of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Gedankenexperiment, pp. 305–320. World Scientific, Singapore (1985)

   Google Scholar 

9. Aerts, D.: A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics and a macroscopical situation that violates bell inequalities. In: Mittelstaedt, P., Stachow, E.W. (eds.) Recent Developments in Quantum Logic, pp. 235–251. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim (1985)

   Google Scholar 

10. Aerts, D.: A mechanistic classical laboratory situation violating the bell inequalities with 2\(\sqrt{2}\), exactly ‘in the same way’ as its violations by the epr experiments. Helv. Phys. Acta64, 1–23 (1991)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

11. Aerts, D., Aerts, S., Broekaert, J., Gabora, L.: The violation of bell inequalities in the macroworld. Found. Phys.30, 1387–1414 (2000)

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

12. Aerts, D., Aerts, S.: Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Found. Sci.1, 85–97 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

13. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combinations i: the structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes34, 167–191 (2005)

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

14. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combinations ii: a hilbert space representation. Kybernetes34, 192–221 (2005)

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Bruza, P.D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, C.J., Sofge, D. (eds.): Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Quantum Interaction. Stanford University, Stanford, 27–29 March 2007

    Google Scholar 

16. Bruza, P.D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, C.J., Sofge, D. (eds.): Quantum Interaction: Proceedings of the Second Quantum Interaction Symposium. College Publications, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

17. Aerts, D.: Quantum structure in cognition. J. Math. Psychol.53, 314–348 (2009)

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

18. Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.): QI 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5494. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

19. Pothos, E.M., Busemeyer, J.R.: A quantum probability model explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. B276, 2171–2178 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Khrennikov, A.Y.: Ubiquitous Quantum Structure. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Book MATH  Google Scholar 

21. Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds.): QI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7052. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

22. Busemeyer, J.R., Pothos, E., Franco, R., Trueblood, J.S.: A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment ‘errors’. Psychol. Rev.118, 193–218 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Busemeyer, J.R., Bruza, P.D.: Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

24. Busemeyer, J.R., Dubois, F., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Melucci, M. (eds.): QI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7620. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

25. Aerts, D., Gabora, L., Sozzo, S.: Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought. Top. Cogn. Sci. (in print). ArXiv: 1206.1069 [cs.AI].

    Google Scholar 

26. Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., Gabora, L., Sozzo, S.: Quantum structure and human thought. Behav. Bra. Sci.36, 274–276 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S.: Quantum structure in cognition: why and how concepts are entangled. In: Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds.) QI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7052, pp. 116–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

28. Aerts, D, Sozzo, S.: The Entanglement Zoo I. Foundational and Structural Aspects, accepted in LNCS (2013)

    Google Scholar 

29. Aerts, D.: Foundations of quantum physics: a general realistic and operational approach. Int. J. Theor. Phys.38, 289–358 (1999)

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

30. Aerts, D.: Quantum particles as conceptual entities: a possible explanatory framework for quantum theory. Found. Sci.14, 361–411 (2010)

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

31. Tsirelson, B.S.: Quantum generalizations of bell’s inequality. Lett. Math. Phys.4, 93–100 (1980)

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references