1. Aleven, V., Ashley, K.D.: Evaluating a Learning Environment for Case-Based Argumentation Skills. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 170–179. ACM Press, New York (1997)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

2. Aleven, V.: How Different Is Different? Arguing about the Significance of Similarities and Differences. In: Smith, I., Faltings, B.V. (eds.) EWCBR 1996. LNCS, vol. 1168, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

3. Aleven, V.: Teaching Case-Based Reasoning Through a Model and Examples. Ph.D. dissertation University of Pittsburgh (1997)

   Google Scholar 

4. Ashley, K.D.: Toward a Computational Theory of Arguing with Precedents: Accomodating Multiple Interpretations of Cases. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 93–102. ACM Press, New York (1989)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

5. Ashley, K.D.: Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge (1990)

   Google Scholar 

6. Ashley, K.D.: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in HYPO. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34, 753–796 (1991)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Bankowski, Z.: Rationales for Precedent. In: MacCormick, D.N., Summers, R.S. (eds.) Interpreting Precedents. A comparative study, Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited, Aldershot (1997)

   Google Scholar 

8. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Sartor, G.: Theory Based Explanation of Case Law Domains. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 12–21. ACM Press, New York (2001)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

9. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Some Observations on Modelling Case Based Reasoning With Formal Argument Models. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 36–42. ACM Press, New York (1999)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

10. Cross, R.: Precedent in English Law. Oxford University Press, Third edition (1977)

    Google Scholar 

11. Hage, J.C.: Reasoning with Rules. In: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic, Kluwer Law and Philosophy Library, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

12. Llewellyn, K.N.: The Common Law Tradition. Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1960)

    Google Scholar 

13. Loui, R.P., Norman, J.: Rationales and Argument Moves. Artificial Intelligence and Law 3, 159–189 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Loui, R.P.: Eliding the Arguments of Cases. Draft (1997), Downloaded fromhttp://www.cs.wustl.edu/~loui/ratjur.txt

15. MacCormick, D.N.: Why Cases have Rationes and what these are. In: Goldstein, L. (ed.) Precedent in Law, pp. 155–182. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

16. Mommers, L.: Applied legal epistemology. Building a knowledge-based ontology of the legal domain. Dissertation Leiden University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

17. Oliphant, H.: A return to stare decisis. American Bar Association Journal 14 (1928); Reprint in: American Legal Theory (ed. Summers, R.S. 1992), pp. 143-153. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited

    Google Scholar 

18. Pollock, J.L.: Defeasible Reasoning. Cognitive Science 11, 481–518 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Pollock, J.L.: Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

20. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 231–287 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Prakken, H.: An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. In: Breuker, J., Leenes, R., Winkels, R. (eds.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: Jurix 2000, pp. 49–57. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

22. Roth, A.C.: The Dialectics of Case Comparison: a Formal Reconstruction. In: Verheij, B., Lodder, A.R., Loui, R.P., Muntjewerff, A.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Jurix Conference, pp. 29–40 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

23. Roth, A.C.: Case-based reasoning in the law. A formal theory of reasoning by case comparison. Dissertation Universiteit Maastricht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

24. Toulmin, S.E.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, London (1958)

    Google Scholar 

25. Valente, A.: Legal Knowledge Engineering. In: A Modelling Approach, IOS Press, Amsterdam, Dissertation (1995)

    Google Scholar 

26. van Kralingen, R.W.: Frame-based Conceptual Models of Statute Law. Dissertation Leiden University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

27. Verheij, B.: Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal studies of argumentation and defeat. Dissertation Universiteit Maastricht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

28. Verheij, B.: Automated Argument Assistance for Lawyers. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 43–52. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

29. Verheij, B.: DEFLOG - a logic of dialectical justification and defeat. Draft (2000), Downloaded fromhttp://www.metajur.unimaas.nl/~bart/publications.htm

30. Verheij, B.: DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 319–346 (2003)

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

31. Visser, P.R.S., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: A Comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6(1), 27–57 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Visser, P.R.S., Winkels, R. (eds.): Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Legal Ontologies. LEGONT 1997. University of Melbourne, Melbourne (1997)

    Google Scholar 

33. Visser, P.R.S.: Knowledge Specification for Multiple Legal Tasks. A Case Study of the Interaction Problem in the Legal Domain. Dissertation Leiden University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

34. Winkels, R., Van Engers, T., Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (eds.): Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references