1. Bloom, D.E., Canning, D.: Global Demographic Change: Dimensions and Economic Significance. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 10817 (2004)

   Google Scholar 

2. Walker, A., Maltby, T.: Active ageing: a strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. Int. J. Soc. Welfare21, 117–130 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Wiles, J.L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., Allen, R.E.S.: The meaning of “ageing in place” to older people. Gerontologist (2011).https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Shaw, J.E., Sicree, R.A., Zimmet, P.Z.: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diab. Res. Clin. Pract.87(1), 4–14 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., King, H.: Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diab. Care27(5), 1047–1053 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Roger, V.L., Go, A.S., Lloyd-Jones, D.M., Adams, R.J., Berry, J.D., Brown, T.M., et al.: American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation123(4), e18–e209 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Geenen, S.J., Powers, L.E., Sells, W.: Understanding the role of health care providers during the transition of adolescents with disabilities and special health care needs. J. Adolesc. Health32(3), 225–233 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Poore, C.: Disability in Twentieth-Century German Culture. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2007)

   Book  Google Scholar 

9. Schmitt, J.M.: Innovative medical technologies help ensure improved patient care and cost-effectiveness. J. Med. Mark.: Device Diagn. Pharm. Mark.2(2), 174–178 (2002)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Cheng, J., Chen, X., Shen, M.: A framework for daily activity monitoring and fall detection based on surface electromyography and accelerometer signals. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.17(1), 38–45 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Baig, M.M., Gholamhosseini, H.: Smart health monitoring systems: an overview of design and modeling. J. Med. Syst.37(2), 1–14 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Rashidi, P., Mihailidis, A.: A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.17(3), 579–590 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Fuchsberger, V.: Ambient assisted living: elderly people’s needs and how to face them. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Semantic Ambient Media Experiences, pp. 21–24. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

14. Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care24(1), 120–124 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: A small but significant difference – the role of gender on acceptance of medical assistive technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Silverstone, R., Morley, D., Dahlberg A, Livingstone, S.: Families, Technologies and Consumption: Household and Information and Communication Technologies. Uxbridge: Centre for Research into Innovation, Culture & Technology, Brunel University (1989)

    Google Scholar 

17. Casenio: Casenio - intelligente Hilfe- & Komfortsysteme [intelligent support and comfort systems] (2016).https://www.casenio.de/

18. Essence: Smart Care - Care@ Home Product Suite (2016).http://www.essence-grp.com/smart-care/care-at-home-pers

19. EarlySense: EarlySense All-in-One System (2016).http://www.earlysense.com/

20. Tunstall: Tunstall - Solutions for Healthcare Professionals (2016).www.tunstallhealthcare.com.au

21. Sixsmith, A., Meuller, S., Lull, F., Klein, M., Bierhoff, I., Delaney, S., Savage, R.: SOPRANO – an ambient assisted living system for supporting older people at home. In: Mokhtari, M., Khalil, I., Bauchet, J., Zhang, D., Nugent, C. (eds.) ICOST 2009. LNCS, vol. 5597, pp. 233–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02868-7_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

22. Gövercin, M., Meyer, S., Schellenbach, M., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Weiss, B., Haesner, M.: SmartSenior@home: acceptance of an integrated ambient assisted living system. Results of a clinical field trial in 35 households. Inform. Health Soc. Care41, 1–18 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A., Müller, P.: Ambient intelligence in assisted living: enable elderly people to handle future interfaces. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4555, pp. 103–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73281-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

24. Beringer, R., Sixsmith, A., Campo, M., Brown, J., McCloskey, R.: The “acceptance” of ambient assisted living: developing an alternate methodology to this limited research lens. In: Abdulrazak, B., Giroux, S., Bouchard, B., Pigot, H., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6719, pp. 161–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21535-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

25. Sun, H., De Florio, V., Gui, N., Blondia, C.: The missing ones: key ingredients towards effective ambient assisted living systems. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ.2(2), 109–120 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

26. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M., Himmel, S.: Perceptions of personal privacy in smart home technologies: do user assessments vary depending on the research method? In: Tryfonas, T., Askoxylakis, I. (eds.) HAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9190, pp. 592–603. Springer, Cham (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20376-8_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

27. Kowalewski, S., Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: Accounting for user diversity in the acceptance of medical assistive technologies. In: Szomszor, M., Kostkova, P. (eds.) eHealth 2010. LNICST, vol. 69, pp. 175–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23635-8_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

28. Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Aud, M., Marek, K., Tyrer, H., Skubic, M., Hussam, A.: Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of “smart home” technologies: a pilot study. Med. Inform. Internet29(2), 87–94 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Ziefle, M., Himmel, S., Wilkowska, W.: When your living space knows what you do: acceptance of medical home monitoring by different technologies. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) USAB 2011. LNCS, vol. 7058, pp. 607–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

30. Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Smart home medical technologies: users’ requirements for conditional acceptance. I-Com15(1), 39–50 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. de Ruyter, B., Pelgrim, E.: Ambient assisted-living research in carelab. Interactions14(4), 30–33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Brauner, P., Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M.: Ubiquitous computing at its best: serious exercise games for older adults in ambient assisted living environments–a technology acceptance perspective. EAI Endorsed Trans. Serious Games15, 1–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

33. Gentry, T.: Smart homes for people with neurological disability: state of the art. NeuroRehabilitation25(3), 209–217 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

34. Harris, J.: The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disabil. Soc.25(4), 427–439 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. López, S.A., Corno, F., Russis, L.D.: Supporting caregivers in assisted living facilities for persons with disabilities: a user study. Univ. Access Inf. Soc.14(1), 133–144 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Mortenson, W.B., Demers, L., Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., Lenker, J., DeRuyter, F.: Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil./Assoc. Acad. Physiatr.92(4), 297–306 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Larizza, M.F., Zukerman, I., Bohnert, F., Busija, L., Bentley, S.A., Russell, R.A., Rees, G.: In-home monitoring of older adults with vision impairment: exploring patients’, caregivers’ and professionals’ views. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.21(1), 56–63 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt (2014).http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173

39. Himmel, S., Ziefle, M., Lidynia, C., Holzinger, A.: Older users’ wish list for technology attributes. In: Cuzzocrea, A., Kittl, C., Simos, D.E., Weippl, E., Xu, L. (eds.) CD-ARES 2013. LNCS, vol. 8127, pp. 16–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40511-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

40. van Heek, J., Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Helpful but spooky? Acceptance of AAL-systems contrasting user groups with focus on disabilities and care needs. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE 2017), pp. 78–90 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

41. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M., Alagöz, F.: How user diversity and country of origin impact the readiness to adopt E-health technologies: an intercultural comparison. Work (Read. Mass.)41(Suppl. 1), 2072–2080 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

42. Klack, L., Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W., Kluge, J.: Telemedical versus conventional heart patient monitoring: a survey study with German physicians. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care29(4), 378–383 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. van Heek, J., Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Privacy, data security, and the acceptance of AAL-systems – a user-specific perspective. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10297, pp. 38–56. Springer, Cham (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references