1. Anscombe, F.J., Aumann, R.J.: A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Stat.34(1), 199–205 (1963)

   Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

2. Arrow, K.J.: Alternative approaches to the theory of choice in risk-taking situations. Econometrica19(4), 404–437 (1951)

   Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

3. Baum, L., Petrie, T.: Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. Ann. Math. Stat.37(6), 1554–1563 (1966)

   Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

4. Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Annales de l’institut Fourier5, 131–295 (1953)

   Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

5. Domingos, P.: The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World. Basic Books, New York (2015)

   Google Scholar 

6. Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ.75(4), 643–669 (1961)

   Article MATH  Google Scholar 

7. Getoor, L., Culler, D., de Sturler, E., Ebert, D., Franklin, M., Jagadish, H.V.: Computing Research and the Emerging Field of Data Science (2016).http://cra.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Computing-Research-and-the-Emerging-Field-of-Data-Science.pdf

8. Gilboa, I., Marinacci, M.: Ambiguity and the Bayesian paradigm. In: Arló-Costa, H., Hendricks, F.V., van Benthem, J. (eds.) Readings in Formal Epistemology. SGTP, vol. 1, pp. 385–439. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_21

   Google Scholar 

9. Hansen, L.P., Marinacci, M.: Ambiguity Aversion and Model Misspecification: An Economic Perspective (2016).http://didattica.unibocconi.it/mypage/dwload.php?nomefile=approximate-02-June-201620160608190839.pdf

10. Hvistendahl, M.: Crime forecasters. Science353, 1484–1487 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Angrist, J., Pischke, J.S.: The credibility revolution in empirical economics: how better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J. Econ. Perspect.24(2), 3–30 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Kirkpatrick, K.: Battling algorithmic bias. Comm. ACM59, 16–17 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

13. Knight, F.H.: Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Houghton Mifflin Co., New York (1921)

    Google Scholar 

14. Lane, D.A., Maxfield, R.R.: Ontological uncertainty and innovation. J. Evol. Econ.15(1), 3–50 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Leamer, E.E.: Let’s take the con out of econometrics. Am. Econ. Rev.73(1), 31–43 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

16. Leamer, E.E.: Tantalus on the road to asymptopia. J. Econ. Perspect.24(2), 31–46 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Liptak, A.: Sent to prison by a software program’s secret algorithms. New York Times, 1 May 2017.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/01/us/politics/sent-to-prison-by-a-software-programs-secret-algorithms.html

18. McCulloch, C.E., Searle, S.R., Neuhaus, J.M.: Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

19. O’Neil, C.: Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown, New York (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

20. Smith, R.E.: Idealizations of uncertainty, and lessons from artificial intelligence. Econ.: Open-Access Open-Assess. E-J.10(2016-7), 1–40 (2016).https://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2016-7

21. Smithson, M.: Ignorance and Uncertainty, Emerging Paradigms. Cognitive Science. Springer-Verlag, New York (1989).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3628-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

22. Stratonovich, R.: Conditional Markov processes. Theory Probab. Appl.5(2), 156–178 (1960)

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

23. Taleb, N.: The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, 2nd edn. Penguin Books, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

24. Walker, W., Lempert, R., Kwakkel, J.H.: Deep uncertainty. In: Gass, S., Fu, M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, Berlin (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1153-7

    Google Scholar 

Download references