• Amaoka, K., Senou, H., & Ono, A. (1994). Record of the bothid flounder Asterorhombus fijiensis from the western Pacific, with observations on the use of the first dorsal-fin ray as a lure.Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 41(1), 23–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Augner, M., & Bernays, E. A. (1998). Plant defence signals and Batesian mimicry.Evolutionary Ecology, 12(6), 667–679.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Avilés, J. M., & Møller, A. (2004). How is host egg mimicry maintained in the cuckoo (Cuculus canorus)?Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 82(1), 57–68.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ayasse, M., Schiestl, F. P., et al. (2003). Pollinator attraction in a sexually deceptive orchid by means of unconventional chemicals.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.Series B–Biological Sciences, 270(1514), 517–522.

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Bacharach, M., & Gambetta, D. (2001). Trust in signs. In K. S. Cook (Ed.),Trust in society (pp. 148–184). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  Google Scholar 

• Barrows, E. M. (2011).Animal behavior desk reference: A dictionary of animal behavior, ecology, and evolution (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Bates, H. W. (1862). Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ.Transactions of the Linnean Society. Zoology, 23, 495–566.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brosset, A. (1997). Aggressive mimicry by the characid fishErythrinus erythrinus.Ethology, 103(11), 926–934.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carpenter, G. D. H., & Ford, E. B. (1933).Mimicry. London: Methuen.

  Google Scholar 

• Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. (1981). Comments on the nature of deception.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 16, 11–14.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dafni, A. (1984). Mimicry and deception in pollination.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 259–278.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Edmunds, M. (1972). Defensive behaviour in Ghanaian praying mantids.Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 51(1), 1–32.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Edmunds, M. (1974).Defence in animals. A survey of anti-predator defences. Essex: Longman.

  Google Scholar 

• Edmunds, M. (1976). The defensive behaviour of Ghanaian praying mantids with a discussion of territoriality.Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58(1), 1–37.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Endler, J. A. (1981). An overview of the relationships between mimicry and crypsis.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 16, 25–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Even, M., & Geoffrey, P. J. (2004). Experimental confirmation of aggressive mimicry by a coral reef fish.Oecologia, 140(4), 676–683.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, R. M. (1988). Observations on the behaviours of three European cuckoo bumble bee species (Psithyrus).Insectes Sociaux, 35(4), 341–354.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goodale, E., & Kotagama, S. W. (2006). Context-dependent vocal mimicry in a passerine bird.Proceedings of the Royal Society B,273, 875–880.

  Google Scholar 

• Greene, H. W., & McDiarmid, R. W. (1981). Coral snake mimicry: Does it occur?Science NS, 213(4513), 1207–1212.

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Grim, T. (2005). Mimicry vs. similarity: Which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not?Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 69–78.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hasson, O. (1997). Towards a general theory of biological signalling.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 185, 139–156.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Heikertinger, F. (1925). Über die Begriffe “Mimikry” und “Mimese” mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Myrmekoidie: Zugleich eine Antwort an E. Wasmann.Biologisches Zentralblatt, 45(5), 272–289.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoffmeyer, J. (2008a).Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs,Approaches to Postmodernity 2. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoffmeyer, J. (2008b). The semiotic niche.Journal of Medical Economics, 9, 5–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Holmgren, N. M. A., & Enquist, M. (1999). Dynamics of mimicry evolution.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 66(2), 145–158.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Honk, C. V., Röseler, P.-F., Velthuis, H., & Malotaux, M. (1981). The conquest of aBombus terrestris colony by a Psithyrus vestalis female.Apidologie, 12(1), 57–67.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Howse, P. E. (2013). Lepidopteran wing patterns and the evolution of satyric mimicry.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 109(1), 203–214.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Howse, P. E., & Allen, J. A. (1994). Satyric mimicry—The evolution of apparent imperfection.Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 257(1349), 111–114.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huheey, J. E. (1964). Studies of warning coloration and mimicry IV. A mathematical model of model–mimic frequencies.Ecology, 45(1), 185–188.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huheey, J. E. (1976). Studies in warning coloration and mimicry VII. Evolutionary consequences of a Batesian–Müllerian spectrum: A model for Müllerian mimicry.Evolution, 30(1), 86–93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huheey, J. E. (1988). Mathematical models of mimicry. In L. P. Brower (Ed.),Mimicry and the evolutionary process (pp. 22–41). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ito, F., Hashim, R., Huei, Y. S., Kaufmann, E., Akino, T., & Billen, J. (2004). Spectacular Batesian mimicry in ants.Naturwissenschaften, 91(10), 481–484.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Joron, M. (2005). Polymorphic mimicry, microhabitat use, and sex-specific behaviour.Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18(3), 547–556.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Jürgens, A., & Shuttleworth, A. (2015). Carrion and dung mimicry in plants. In M. E. Benbow, J. K. Tomberlin, & A. M. Tarone (Eds.),Carrion ecology, evolution, and their applications (pp. 361–386). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Kleisner, K. (2008). The semantic morphology of Adolf Portmann: A starting point for the biosemiotics of organic form?Biosemiotics, 1(2), 207–219.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kleisner, K., & Markoš, A. (2005). Semetic rings: Towards the new concept of mimetic resemblances.Theory in Biosciences, 123(3), 209–222.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Komárek, S. (2003).Mimicry, aposematism and related phenomena.Mimetism in nature and the history of its study. München: Lincom Europa.

  Google Scholar 

• Küpper, G., & Schwammberger, K. H. (1995). Social parasitism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae): Observations of Psithyrus sylvestris in Bombus pratorum nests.Apidologie, 26(3), 245–254.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lev-Yadun, S. (2014). Defensive masquerade by plants.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113(4), 1162–1166.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lloyd, J. E. (1986). Firefly communication and deception: Oh what a tangled web. In R. W. Mitchell & N. S. Thompson (Eds.),Deception. Perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit (pp. 113–128). New York: State University of New York Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Mallet, J., & Joron, M. (1999). Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: Polymorphisms, shifting balance, and speciation.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 201–233.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maran, T. (2007a). Mimicry. In P. Bouissac & A. Lewis (Eds.),Semiotics encyclopedia online. E.J. Pratt Library, Victoria University.http://www.semioticon.com/seo/. Accessed 13 June 2016.

• Martin, S. J., Carruthers, J. M., Williams, P. H., & Drijfhout, F. P. (2010). Host specific social parasites (Psithyrus) indicate chemical recognition system in bumblebees.Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36(8), 855–863.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• McElroy, J. S. (2014). Vavilovian mimicry: Nikolai Vavilov and his little-known impact on weed science.Weed Science, 62(2), 207–216.

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• McIver, J. D., & Stonedahl, G. (1993). Myrmecomorphy—Morphological and behavioral mimicry of ants.Annual Review of Entomology, 38, 351–379.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mertens, R. (1956). Das Problem der Mimikry bei Korallenschlangen.Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere, 84, 541–576.

  Google Scholar 

• Moran, J. A. (1996). Pitcher dimorphism, prey composition and the mechanisms of prey attraction in the pitcher plant Nepenthes rafflesiana in Borneo.Journal of Ecology, 84(4), 515–525.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Müller, F. (1878). Ueber die Vortheile der Mimicry bei Schmetterlingen.Zoologischer Anzeiger, 1, 54–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. (2002). Sexual mimicry in hyenas.The Quarterly Review of Biology, 77(1), 3–16.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, X. J., & Jackson, R. R. (2009). Collective Batesian mimicry of ant groups by aggregating spiders.Animal Behaviour, 78(1), 123–129.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pasteur, G. (1982). A classificatory review of mimicry systems.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 169–199.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Payne, R. (1977). The ecology of brood parasitism in birds.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 8, 1–28.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peckham, E. G. (1889). Protective resemblances in spiders.Occasional Papers of the Natural History Society of Wisconsin, 1, 61–113.

  Google Scholar 

• Pekár, S., & Křál, J. (2002). Mimicry complex in two central European zodariid spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae): How Zodarion deceives ants.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75(4), 517–532.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Plowright, R. C., & Owen, R. E. (1980). The evolutionary significance of bumble bee color patterns: A mimetic interpretation.Evolution, 34(4), 622–637.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Portmann, A. (1964).New paths in biology (A. J. Pomerans, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

  Google Scholar 

• Poulton, E. B. (1890).The colours of animals. Their meaning and use, especially considered in the case of insects. New York: D. Appleton and Co..

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Rainey, M. M., & Grether, G. F. (2007). Competitive mimicry: Synthesis of a neglected class of mimetic relationships.Ecology, 88(10), 2440–2448.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Randall, J. E. (2005). A review of mimicry in marine fishes.Zoological Studies, 44(3), 299–328.

  Google Scholar 

• Robinson, M. H. (1981). A stick is a stick and not worth eating: On the definition of mimicry.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 16(1), 15–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rothschild, M. (1984). Aide mémoire mimicry.Ecological Entomology, 9(3), 311–319.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Roy, B. A., & Widmer, A. (1999). Floral mimicry: A fascinating yet poorly understood phenomenon.Trends in Plant Science, 4(8), 325–330.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Ruxton, G. D., Sherratt, T. N., & Speed, M. P. (2004).Avoiding attack. The evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Schiestl, F. P. (2005). On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids.Naturwissenschaften, 92(6), 255–264.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Speed, M. P. (1999). Robot predators in virtual ecologies: The importance of memory in mimicry studies.Animal Behaviour, 57(1), 203–213.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Srygley, R. B. (1999). Incorporating motion into investigations of mimicry.Evolutionary Ecology, 13(7), 691–708.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Starrett, A. (1993). Adaptive resemblance: A unifying concept for mimicry and crypsis.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 48(4), 229–317.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tembrock, G. (1997). Ökosemiose. In R. Posner, K. Robering, & T. A. Sebeok (Eds.),Semiotik: Ein Handbuch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur (Vol. 1, pp. 571–591). Berlin: de Gruyter.

  Google Scholar 

• van Someren, V. G. L., & Jackson, T. H. E. (1959). Some comments on protective resemblance amongst African Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera).Journal of Lepidopterists’ Society, 13(3), 121–150.

  Google Scholar 

• Vane-Wright, R. I. (1976). A unified classification of mimetic resemblances.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 8(1), 25–56.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vane-Wright, R. I. (1980). On the definition of mimicry.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 13(1), 1–6.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vane-Wright, R. I. (1981). Only connect.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 16(1), 33–40.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• von Uexküll, J. (1982). The theory of meaning.Semiotica, 42(1), 25–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Waldbauer, G. P. (1988). Asyncrony between Batesian mimics and their models. In L. P. Brower (Ed.),Mimicry and the evolutionary process (pp. 103–121). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wenner, A. (1969). The study of animal communication: An overview. In T. A. Sebeok & A. Ramsay (Eds.),Approaches to animal communication (pp. 232–243). Mouton: The Hague.

  Google Scholar 

• Wickler, W. (1965). Mimicry and the evolution of animal communication.Nature, 208, 519–521.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wickler, W. (1968).Mimicry in plants and animals (R. D. Martin, Trans.). London: George Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

  Google Scholar 

• Wickler, W. (2013). Understanding mimicry—With special reference to vocal mimicry.Ethology, 119(4), 259–269.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wiens, D. (1978). Mimicry in plants.Evolutionary Biology, 11, 364–403.

  Google Scholar 

• Wong, B. B. M., & Schiestl, F. P. (2002). How an orchid harms its pollinator.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B,269, 1529–1532.

  Google Scholar 

• Wüster, W., Allum, C. S. E., Bjargardóttir, I. B., Bailey, K. L., Dawson, K. J., et al. (2004). Do aposematism and Batesian mimicry require bright colours? A test, using European viper markings.Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 271(1556), 2495–2499.

  Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Zabka, H., & Tembrock, G. (1986). Mimicry and crypsis—A behavioural approach to classification.Behavioural Processes, 13(1–2), 159–176.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references