1. de Berg, M., Cheong, O., van Kreveld, M., Overmars, M.: Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications, pp. 323–333. Springer, New York (2008)

   Book MATH  Google Scholar 

2. Campbell, S., Naeem, W., Irwin, G.: A review on improving the autonomy of unmanned surface vehicles through intelligent collision avoidance manoeuvres. Ann. Rev. Control36(2), 267–283 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Daniel, K., Nash, A., Koenig, S., Felner, A.: Theta*: any-angle path planning on grids. J. Artif. Intell. Res.39(2010), 533–579 (2010)

   MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

4. Duchoň, F., Babinec, A., Kajan, M., Beňo, P., Florek, M., Fico, T., Jurišica, L.: Path planning with modified a star algorithm for a mobile robot. Procedia Eng.96, 59–69 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Economic commission for Europe: inventory of most important bottlenecks and missing links in the E waterway network. Technical report. ECE/TRANS/SC.3/159/Rev.1, Economic Commission for Europe, Inland Transport Committee, United Nations (2013)

   Google Scholar 

6. European Commission: Naiades II: Towards quality inland waterway transport. Technical report COM 623, European Commission (2013)

   Google Scholar 

7. European Commission: The European Union explained: Transport. Technical report European Commission (2014)

   Google Scholar 

8. Froese, J.: Safe and efficient port approach by vessel traffic management in waterways. In: Ocampo-Martinez, C., Negenborn, R.R. (eds.) Transport of Water versus Transport over Water. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol. 58, pp. 281–296. Springer, New York (2015)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

9. Google Maps: Port of Rotterdam, Street map (2016).https://www.google.nl/maps/@51.8820487,4.4343202,10.75z

10. Hekkenberg, R.: Technological challenges and developments in European inland waterway transport. In: Ocampo-Martinez, C., Negenborn, R.R. (eds.) Transport of Water versus Transport over Water. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol. 58, pp. 297–313. Springer, New York (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

11. Kuwata, Y., Wolf, M., Zarzhitsky, D., Huntsberger, T.: Safe maritime autonomous navigation with COLREGS using velocity obstacles. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng.39(1), 110–119 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Lazarowska, A.: Ship’s trajectory planning for collision avoidance at sea based on ant colony optimisation. J. Navig.68(2), 291–307 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Li, S., Negenborn, R.R., Lodewijks, G.: Distributed constraint optimization for addressing vessel rotation planning problems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.48(2016), 159–172 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Movares Projectteam MNV’13: Monitoring nautische veiligheid 2013. Technical report, Rijkswaterstaat Water, Verkeer en Leefomgeving, Afdeling Veiligheidsmanagement en Verkeersveiligheid (2013)

    Google Scholar 

15. Rijkswaterstaat: Binnenvaartpolitiereglement (1983).http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0003628/2016-01-01#DeelI_Hoofdstuk6_AfdelingI_Artikel6.01

16. Rijkswaterstaat: Scheepsongevallen significant (2016).https://geoweb.rijkswaterstaat.nl/westnederlandnoord/GeoWeb41/?Viewer=WNN_Scheepsongevallen

17. Rijkswaterstaat: Scheepsongevallendatabase (2016).https://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/zakelijk/verkeersmanagement/scheepvaart/scheepsongevallenregistratie/index.aspx

18. Sariff, N., Buniyamin, N.: An overview of autonomous mobile robot path planning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 4th Student Conference on Research and Development, pp. 183–188. Selangor, Malaysia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

19. Shah, B.C., Švec, P., Bertaska, I.R., Sinisterra, A.J., Klinger, W., Ellenrieder, K., Dhanak, M., Gupta, S.K.: Resolution-adaptive risk-aware trajectory planning for surface vehicles operating in congested civilian traffic. Autonomous Robots, first Online (2015)

    Google Scholar 

20. Siegwart, R., Nourbakhsh, I.R., Scaramuzza, D.: Introduction to Autonomous Mobile Robots, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

21. Statheros, T., Howells, G., Maier, K.M.: Autonomous ship collision avoidance navigation concepts, technologies and techniques. J. Navig.61(1), 129–142 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Uras, T., Koenig, S.: An empirical comparison of any-angle path-planning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Search, pp. 206–210. Ein Gedi, Israel (2015)

    Google Scholar 

23. Vaneck, T.W.: Fuzzy guidance controller for an autonomous boat. IEEE Control Syst. Mag.17(2), 43–51 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Vantorre, M., Delefortrie, G., Eloot, K., Laforce, E.: Experimental investigation of ship-bank interaction forces. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Maneuverability, pp. 1–9. Kanazawa, Japan (2003)

    Google Scholar 

25. Verstichel, J., Causmaecker, P.D., Spieksma, F., Berghe, G.V.: The generalized lock scheduling problem: an exact approach. Trans. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev.65, 16–34 (2014)

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

26. Xin, J., Negenborn, R.R., Corman, F., Lodewijks, G.: Control of interacting machines in automated container terminals using a sequential planning approach for collision avoidance. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol.60(2015), 377–396 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Zheng, H., Negenborn, R.R., Lodewijks, G.: Predictive path following with arrival time awareness for waterborne AGVs. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (2015).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.004

Download references