Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Integrating Mixed-Methods for Evaluating Information Access Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series:Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9283))

Abstract

The evaluation of information access systems is increasingly making use of multiple evaluation methods. While such studies represent forms of mixed-methods research, they are rarely acknowledged as such. This means that researchers are potentially failing to recognise the challenges and opportunities offered by multi-phase research, particularly in terms of data integration. This paper provides a brief case study of how one framework – Bazely & Kemp’s metaphors for integrated analysis – was employed to formalise data integration for a large exploratory evaluation study.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bazeley, P., Kemp, L.: Mosaics, Triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for Integrated Analysis in Mixed Methods Research. J. Mix. Methods Res.6(1), 55–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bryman, A.: Why do researchers integrate/combine/mesh/blend/mix/merge/fuse quantitative and qualitative research? In: Bergman, M.M. (ed.) Advances in Mixed Methods Research, pp. 87–100. SAGE, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denzin, N.K.: The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denzin, N.K.: Triangulation 2.0. J. Mix. Methods Res.6(2), 80–88 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fidel, R.: Are we there yet?: Mixed methods research in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research30, 265–272 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greene, J.C.: Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly, D.: Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval3, 1–224 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., Sechrest, L.: Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Rand McNally, Chicago (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Woolley, C.M.: Meeting the Mixed Methods Challenge of Integration in a Sociological Study of Structure and Agency. J. Mix. Methods Res.3(7), 7–25 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Simon Wakeling & Paul Clough

Authors
  1. Simon Wakeling

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Clough

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toSimon Wakeling.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, Toulouse , France

    Josanne Mothe

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Neuchatel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland

    Jacques Savoy

  3. Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen, Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Jaap Kamps

  4. Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

    Karen Pinel-Sauvagnat

  5. School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    Gareth Jones

  6. LIA - CERI, Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, Avignon, France

    Eric San Juan

  7. Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

    Linda Capellato

  8. of Information Engineering (DEI), University of Padua, Department, Padova, Italy

    Nicola Ferro

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wakeling, S., Clough, P. (2015). Integrating Mixed-Methods for Evaluating Information Access Systems. In: Mothe, J.,et al. Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9283. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24027-5_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp