1. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, USA, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)

   Google Scholar 

2. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In: The 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 5, Orlando, USA, pp. 4104–4108, October 1997

   Google Scholar 

3. Hu, W., Song, J., Li, W.: A new PSO scheduling simulation algorithm based on an intelligent compensation particle position rounding off. In: ICNC ’08 Proceedings of the 2008 Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation, vol. 1, Jinan, China, pp. 145–149, October 2008

   Google Scholar 

4. Junker, U.: Air traffic flow management with heuristic repair. The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 0, pp. 1–24 (2004)

   Google Scholar 

5. Shaa, D., H.H., L.: A multi-objective PSO for job-shop scheduling problems. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, pp. 1065–1070 (2010)

   Google Scholar 

6. Badamchizadeh, M., Madani, K.: Applying modified discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm and genetic algorithm for system identification. In: Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE), 2010, vol. 5, Singapore, Republic of Singapore, pp. 354–358, February 2010

   Google Scholar 

7. Eberhart, R., Shi, Y.: Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Evolutionary Programming, San Diego, USA, pp. 611–616, March 1998

   Google Scholar 

8. Liaoa, C., Tsengb, C., Luarnb, P.: A discrete version of particle swarm optimization for flowshop scheduling problems. Computers & Operations Research34, 3099–3111 (2007)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Hassan, R., Cohanim, B., de Weck, O., Venter, G.: A comparison of particle swarm optimization and the genetic algorithm. Tech. rep., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139 (2004)

   Google Scholar 

10. Clerc, M.: Standard particle swarm optimisation, Tech. rep., maurice.clerc@Writeme.com (2012)

    Google Scholar 

11. Leboucher, C., Shin, H.-S., Siarry, P., Chelouah, R., Ménec, S.L., Tsourdos, A.: A Two-Step Optimisation Method for Dynamic Weapon Target Assignment Problem. Recent Advances on Meta-Heuristics and Their Application to Real Scenarios, InTech (2013)

    Google Scholar 

12. Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Edinburgh, UK, September 2005

    Google Scholar 

13. Suganthan, P.N., Hansen, N., Liang, J.J., Deb, K., Chen, Y.P., Auger, A., Tiwari, S.: Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2005 special session on real-parameter optimization. Tech. rep., Technical Report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore and KanGAL Report Number 2005005 (Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, IIT Kanpur) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

14. Leboucher, C., Chelouah, R., Siarry, P., Ménec, S.L.: A swarm intelligence method combined to evolutionary game theory applied to resource allocation problem. In: International conference on swarm intelligence, Cergy, France, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

15. Leboucher, C., Chelouah, R., Siarry, P., Le Ménec, S.: A swarm intelligence method combined to evolutionary game theory applied to the resources allocation problem. International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR)3(2), 20–38 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Mendes, R.: Population topologies and their influence in particle swarm performance. PhD thesis, University Minho (2004)

    Google Scholar 

17. Clerc, M.: Back to random topology. Tech. rep., maurice.clerc@Writeme.com (2007)

    Google Scholar 

18. Taylor, P., Jonker, L.: Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Bioscience40, 145–156 (1978)

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

19. Cressman, R.: Evolutionary Dynamics and Extensive Form Games. MIT Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

20. Sandholm, W.: Population Games and Evolutionary Dynamics. MIT Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

21. Floudas, C.A., Pardalos, P.M.: Encyclopedia of Optimization. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

22. McCulloch, W.S., Pitts, W.: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics5(4), 115–133 (1943)

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

23. Ackley, D.H., Hinton, G.E., Sejnowski, T.J.: A learning algorithm for Boltzman machines. Cognitive Sciences9, 147–169 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Fausett, L.: Fundamentals of neural networks: Architectures, algorithms, and applications. Prentice Hall (1994)

    Google Scholar 

25. Haykin, S.: Neural Networks: A comprehensive foundation. MacMillan College (1994)

    Google Scholar 

26. Cichocki, A., Unbehauen, R.: Neural networks for optimization and signal processing. Wiley (1993)

    Google Scholar 

27. Looi, C.-K.: Neural network methods in combinatorial optimization. Computational Operations Research19(3–4), 191–208 (1992)

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

28. Ansari, N., Hou, E.S.H., Yu, Y.: A new method to optimize the satellite broadcasting schedules using the mean field annealing of a Hopfield neural network. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks6(2), 470–482 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Lagerholm, M., Peterson, C., Soderberg, B.: Airline crew scheduling with Potts neurons. Neural Computation9, 1589–1599 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Fang, L., Li, T.: Design of competition-based neural networks for combinatorial optimization. International Journal of Neural Systems1(3), 221–235 (1990)

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

31. Hopfield, J., Tank, D.W.: Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biological Cybernetics52(3), 141–152 (1985)

    MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

32. Levy, B.C., Adam, M.B.: Global optimization with stochastic neural networks. In: First International Conference on Neural networks for Optimization and signal processing, San Diego, USA, pp. 681–690 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

33. Abe, S., Kawakami, J., Hirasawa, K.: Solving inequality constrained combinatorial optimization problems by the Hopfield neural networks. Neural Networks5, 663–670 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. MATLAB, Neural Networks Toolbox

    Google Scholar 

35. Auger, A., Hansen, N.: A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1769–1776 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

36. Sinha, A., Tiwari, S., Deb, K.: A population-based, steady-state procedure for real-parameter optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 514–521 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references