Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Analysis Pipeline for High-Dimensional Neuromechanical Model Improvement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems(Living Machines 2024)

Abstract

To capture and understand animal behavior, engineers and biologists seek to develop biologically accurate neuromechanical models of muscle dynamics and neural control. However, demand-driven enhancement of complex neuromechanics, such as the multifunctionalAplysia californica feeding apparatus, can be challenging due to the multidimensional biomechanical and neural models involved. We propose an analysis pipeline that enables reinforcement learning (RL) to classify which aspects of an engineered neuromechanical model can accurately capture animal behavior. As an example, prioritizing where demand-driven enhancement of a biomechanical and neural model is needed, the neural model of a published neuromechanical model ofAplysia swallowing during feeding was replaced with an RL controller and their performances were compared and correlated within vivo swallowing behavior. By comparing the performance of the neural model and the learned model toin vivo animal behavior, we can pinpoint areas for improvement. The analysis pipeline identified that the neuromechanical model confidently captured force performance with no significant difference from animal swallowing force behavior. It most usefully also indicated that the biomechanical model will need to be improved in future iterations to better capture motor neuron activity. Future work should explore the accuracy of the RL-enabled analysis pipeline with a more advanced biomechanical model.

This work was supported by NSF DBI2015317 as part of the NSF/CIHR/DFG/FRQ/UKRI-MRC Next Generation Networks for Neuroscience Program, by the NSF Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE1745016, and by internal funding through Carnegie Mellon University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 8464
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 10581
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karakasiliotis, K., et al.: From cineradiography to biorobots: an approach for designing robots to emulate and study animal locomotion. J. R. Soc. Interface13(119), 20151089 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ijspeert, A.J.: Biorobotics: using robots to emulate and investigate agile locomotion. Science346(6206), 196–203 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostrowski, J., Burdick, J.W.: The geometric mechanics of undulatory robotic locomotion. Int. J. Robot. Res.17(7), 683–701 (1998).https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499801700701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aguilar, J., et al.: A review on locomotion robophysics: the study of movement at the intersection of robotics, soft matter and dynamical systems. Rep. Prog. Phys.79(11), 110001 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/110001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, X., et al.: A neuromechanical model for Drosophila larval crawling based on physical measurements. BMC Biol.20(1), 130 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01336-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Markin, S.N., Klishko, A.N., Shevtsova, N.A., Lemay, M.A., Prilutsky, B.I., Rybak, I.A.: Afferent control of locomotor CPG: insights from a simple neuromechanical model. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1198(1), 21–34 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05435.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sreenivasa, M., Valero-Cuevas, F.J., Tresch, M., Nakamura, Y., Schouten, A.C., Sartori, M.: Editorial: neuromechanics and control of physical behavior: from experimental and computational formulations to bio-inspired technologies. Front. Comput. Neurosci.13, (2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2019.00013

  8. Higuchi, K., Kazawa, T., Sakai, B., Namiki, S., Haupt, S.S., Kanzaki, R.: High performance, large-scale multi-compartment Hodgkin-Huxley simulation of Drosophila’s whole-brain neural circuit model. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2022).https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.01.512969

  9. Gill, J.P., Chiel, H.J.: Rapid adaptation to changing mechanical load by ordered recruitment of identified motor neurons. eneuro, pp. ENEURO.0016-20.2020 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0016-20.2020

  10. Lyttle, D., Gill, J., Shaw, K.M., Thomas, P., Chiel, H.J.: Robustness, flexibility, and sensitivity in a multifunctional motor control model, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 25–47 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-016-0704-8

  11. Shaw, K.M., et al.: The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior. J. Comput. Neurosci.38(1), 25–51 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-014-0519-3

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Novakovic, V.A., Sutton, G.P., Neustadter, D.M., Beer, R.D., Chiel, H.J.: Mechanical reconfiguration mediates swallowing and rejection inAplysia californica. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol.192(8), 857–870 (2006).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0124-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Webster-Wood, V.A., Gill, J.P., Thomas, P.J., Chiel, H.J.: Control for multifunctionality: bioinspired control based on feeding inAplysia californica. Biol. Cybern.114(6), 557–588 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-020-00851-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, Y., Sukhnandan, R., Gill, J.P., Chiel, H.J., Webster-Wood, V., Quinn, R.D.: A bioinspired synthetic nervous system controller for pick-and-place manipulation. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA)2023, 8047–8053 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai, K., et al.: SLUGBOT, anAplysia-inspired robotic grasper for studying control. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 182–194 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20470-8_19

  16. Sun, W., Xu, M., Gill, J., Thomas, P., Chiel, H.J., Webster-Wood, V.A.: GymSlug: Deep Reinforcement Learning Toward Bio-inspired Control Based onAplysia californica Feeding, pp. 236–248 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20470-8_24

  17. Hurwitz, I., Kupfermann, I., Susswein, A.J.: Different roles of neurons B63 and B34 that are active during the protraction phase of buccal motor programs inAplysia californica. J. Neurophysiol.78(3), 1305–1319 (1997).https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.78.3.1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. “Cross-correlation - MATLAB xcorr.www.mathworks.com.https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/xcorr.html

  19. Kreiss, J.P., Paparoditis, E.: Bootstrap methods for dependent data: a review. J. Korean Stat. Soc.40(4), 357–378 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2011.08.009

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. McManus, J.M., Lu, H., Cullins, M.J., Chiel, H.J.: Differential activation of an identified motor neuron and neuromodulation provideAplysia’s retractor muscle an additional function. J. Neurophysiol.112(4), 778–791 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00148.2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamazaki, K., Vo-Ho, V.-K., Bulsara, D., Le, N.: Spiking neural networks and their applications: a review. Brain Sci.12(7), 863 (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, Y., Webster-Wood, V.A., Gill, J.P., Sutton, G.P., Chiel, H.J., Quinn, R.D.: A synthetic nervous system controls a biomechanical model ofAplysia feeding. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 354–365 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20470-8_35

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Jeff Gill for sharing the animal data from his 2020 publication [9] for use in these comparisons. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful edits and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA

    Camila J. Fernandez, Michael J. Bennington & Victoria A. Webster-Wood

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA

    Victoria A. Webster-Wood

  3. McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA

    Victoria A. Webster-Wood

  4. Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Jeffrey M. McManus & Hillel J. Chiel

  5. Mechanical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Yanjun Li & Roger D. Quinn

  6. Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Hillel J. Chiel

  7. Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Hillel J. Chiel

Authors
  1. Camila J. Fernandez
  2. Jeffrey M. McManus
  3. Yanjun Li
  4. Michael J. Bennington
  5. Roger D. Quinn
  6. Hillel J. Chiel
  7. Victoria A. Webster-Wood

Corresponding author

Correspondence toCamila J. Fernandez.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

    Nicholas S. Szczecinski

  2. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA

    Victoria Webster-Wood

  3. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

    Matthew Tresch

  4. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    William R. P. Nourse

  5. Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands

    Anna Mura

  6. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Roger D. Quinn

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fernandez, C.J.et al. (2025). Analysis Pipeline for High-Dimensional Neuromechanical Model Improvement. In: Szczecinski, N.S., Webster-Wood, V., Tresch, M., Nourse, W.R.P., Mura, A., Quinn, R.D. (eds) Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems. Living Machines 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14930. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72597-5_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 8464
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 10581
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp