- Daniel Ebbert ORCID:orcid.org/0000-0003-3666-720512,
- Alrike Claassen ORCID:orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-328712,
- Natasha Wilson ORCID:orcid.org/0000-0003-4797-942312,
- Srecko Joksimovic ORCID:orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-354712,
- Negin Mirriahi ORCID:orcid.org/0000-0003-4139-314912 &
- …
- Shane Dawson ORCID:orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-219312
Part of the book series:Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 15159))
Included in the following conference series:
Abstract
Task-unrelated thoughts are a common experience for students that negatively impact learning outcomes. In the context of learning from videos, research has attempted to mitigate the impact by including interpolated testing at pauses in the video. The results of these studies are mixed and indicate that interpolated testing may not have a practical effect on reducing task-unrelated thoughts. In the present study, we aim to investigate whether writing self-explanations has a stronger effect than interpolated testing on reducing task-unrelated thoughts and improving learning outcomes. We recruited 138 participants distributed across three groups and presented them with the same video to review. The first group was the control group. The participants in the second group answered interpolated tests, and the participants in the third group wrote self-explanations at pauses in the video. All participants completed a knowledge test before and after watching the video to compare learning outcomes between groups. While previous studies have captured thought reports using probes at pre-determined intervals, we used self-caught thought reports in anticipation that participants expecting to write self-explanations would engage in metacognitive monitoring and thus become meta-aware. We found no significant difference between the groups regarding knowledge gain or meta-awareness. However, the number of thought reports written correlated positively with knowledge gain, indicating that learners who are meta-aware while learning from a video perform better on subsequent knowledge tests.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 9151
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Softcover Book
- JPY 11439
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wong, A.Y., Smith, S.L., McGrath, C.A., Flynn, L.E., Mills, C.: Task-unrelated thought during educational activities: A meta-analysis of its occurrence and relationship with learning. Contemp. Educ. Psychol.71, 102098 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102098
Bonifacci, P., Viroli, C., Vassura, C., Colombini, E., Desideri, L.: The relationship between mind wandering and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev.30, 40–59 (2023).https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02141-w
Kane, M.J., Smeekens, B.A., von Bastian, C.C., Lurquin, J.H., Carruth, N.P., Miyake, A.: A combined experimental and individual-differences investigation into mind wandering during a video lecture. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.146, 1649–1674 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000362
Wong, S.S.H., Lim, S.W.H.: Take notes, not photos: Mind-wandering mediates the impact of note-taking strategies on video-recorded lecture learning performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl.29, 124–135 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000375
Welhaf, M.S., Phillips, N.E., Smeekens, B.A., Miyake, A., Kane, M.J.: Interpolated testing and content pretesting as interventions to reduce task-unrelated thoughts during a video lecture. Cogn. Research.7, 26 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00372-y
Pan, S.C., Schmitt, A.G., Bjork, E.L., Sana, F.: Pretesting reduces mind wandering and enhances learning during online lectures. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn.9, 542–554 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.07.004
Szpunar, K.K., Khan, N.Y., Schacter, D.L.: Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, 6313–6317 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221764110
Jing, H.G., Szpunar, K.K., Schacter, D.L.: Interpolated testing influences focused attention and improves integration of information during a video-recorded lecture. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl.22, 305–318 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000087
Fiorella, L., Stull, A.T., Kuhlmann, S., Mayer, R.E.: Fostering generative learning from video lessons: Benefits of instructor-generated drawings and learner-generated explanations. J. Educ. Psychol.112, 895–906 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000408
Fiorella, L., Mayer, R.E.: Learning by Self-Explaining. In: Learning as a Generative Activity: Eight Learning Strategies that Promote Understanding. pp. 124–150. Cambridge University Press (2015).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707085
Fiorella, L., Mayer, R.E.: Introduction to Learning as a Generative Activity. In: Learning as a Generative Activity: Eight Learning Strategies that Promote Understanding. pp. 1–19. Cambridge University Press (2015).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707085
Chin, J.M., Schooler, J.W.: Meta-Awareness. In: Encyclopedia of Consciousness. pp. 33–41. Elsevier (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373873-8.00051-7
Smallwood, J., Baracaia, S.F., Lowe, M., Obonsawin, M.: Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Conscious. Cogn.12, 452–484 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00018-7
Smallwood, J., Obonsawin, M., Heim, D.: Task unrelated thought: The role of distributed processing. Conscious. Cogn.12, 169–189 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00003-X
Kam, J.W.Y., et al.: Slow Fluctuations in Attentional Control of Sensory Cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci.23, 460–470 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21443
Smallwood, J., Fishman, D.J., Schooler, J.W.: Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance. Psychon. Bull. Rev.14, 230–236 (2007).https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194057
Smallwood, J.: Mind-wandering While Reading: Attentional Decoupling, Mindless Reading and the Cascade Model of Inattention. Language and Linguistics Compass.5, 63–77 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00263.x
Welhaf, M.S., et al.: An exploratory analysis of individual differences in mind wandering content and consistency. Psychol. Conscious. Theory Res. Pract.7, 103–125 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000180
Fiorella, L.: Learning by explaining after pauses in video lectures: Are provided visuals a scaffold or a crutch? Appl. Cogn. Psychol.36, 1142–1149 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3994
Schooler, J.W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T.C., Reichle, E.D., Sayette, M.A.: Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends Cogn. Sci.15, 319–326 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006
McComas, W.F.: Metacognition. In: McComas, W.F. (ed.) The Language of Science Education, pp. 63–63. SensePublishers, Rotterdam (2014).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_55
Schooler, J.W.: Re-representing consciousness: dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci.6, 339–344 (2002).https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01949-6
Chu, M.T., Marks, E., Smith, C.L., Chadwick, P.: Self-caught methodologies for measuring mind wandering with meta-awareness: A systematic review. Conscious. Cogn.108, 103463 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103463
Weinstein, Y.: Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways. Behav Res.50, 642–661 (2018).https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9
Nelson, T.O.: Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings. Psychol. Learn. Motiv.26, 125–173 (1990).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
Nelson, T.O., Narens, L.: Why Investigate Metacognition? In: Metcalfe, J. and Shimamura, A.P. (eds.) Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. pp. 1–25. The MIT Press (1994).https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4561.003.0003
Nelson, T.O.: Consciousness and Metacognition. Am. Psychol.51, 102–116 (1996).https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102
Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., Schooler, J.W.: The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychon. Bull. Rev.14, 527–533 (2007).https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194102
Wirzberger, M., Esmaeili Bijarsari, S., Rey, G.D.: Embedded interruptions and task complexity influence schema-related cognitive load progression in an abstract learning task. Acta Physiol. (Oxf)179, 30–41 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.001
Conard, M.A., Marsh, R.F.: Interest level improves learning but does not moderate the effects of interruptions: An experiment using simultaneous multitasking. Learn. Individ. Differ.30, 112–117 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.11.004
Seli, P., Smallwood, J., Cheyne, J.A., Smilek, D.: On the relation of mind wandering and ADHD symptomatology. Psychon. Bull. Rev.22, 629–636 (2015).https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0793-0
Hanson, J.: Why Is Blue So Rare In Nature?,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3g246c6Bv58
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J.W.: The Science of Mind Wandering: Empirically Navigating the Stream of Consciousness. Annu. Rev. Psychol.66, 487–518 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331
Kopp, K., Mills, C., D’Mello, S.: Mind wandering during film comprehension: The role of prior knowledge and situational interest. Psychon. Bull. Rev.23, 842–848 (2016).https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0936-y
Zhang, H., Miller, K.F., Sun, X., Cortina, K.S.: Wandering eyes: Eye movements during mind wandering in video lectures. Appl Cognit Psychol.34, 449–464 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3632
Zedelius, C.M., Broadway, J.M., Schooler, J.W.: Motivating meta-awareness of mind wandering: A way to catch the mind in flight? Conscious. Cogn.36, 44–53 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.016
Risko, E.F., Buchanan, D., Medimorec, S., Kingstone, A.: Everyday attention: Mind wandering and computer use during lectures. Comput. Educ.68, 275–283 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.001
Acknowledgments
The first author is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program international (RTPi) Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Daniel Ebbert, Alrike Claassen, Natasha Wilson, Srecko Joksimovic, Negin Mirriahi & Shane Dawson
- Daniel Ebbert
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Alrike Claassen
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Natasha Wilson
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Srecko Joksimovic
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Negin Mirriahi
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Shane Dawson
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toDaniel Ebbert.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Rafael Ferreira Mello
Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Nikol Rummel
FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany
Ioana Jivet
University for Continuing Education Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria
Gerti Pishtari
University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
José A. Ruipérez Valiente
Ethics declarations
The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article's content.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ebbert, D., Claassen, A., Wilson, N., Joksimovic, S., Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S. (2024). Addressing Mind Wandering in Video-Based Learning: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Interpolated Testing and Self-explanation. In: Ferreira Mello, R., Rummel, N., Jivet, I., Pishtari, G., Ruipérez Valiente, J.A. (eds) Technology Enhanced Learning for Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education. EC-TEL 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_9
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Springer, Cham
Print ISBN:978-3-031-72314-8
Online ISBN:978-3-031-72315-5
eBook Packages:Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
Share this paper
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative