Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Clustering Disease Trajectories in Contrastive Feature Space for Biomarker Proposal in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly. Current grading systems based on imaging biomarkers only coarsely group disease stages into broad categories that lack prognostic value for future disease progression. It is widely believed that this is due to their focus on a single point in time, disregarding the dynamic nature of the disease. In this work, we present the first method to automatically propose biomarkers that capture temporal dynamics of disease progression. Our method represents patient time series as trajectories in a latent feature space built with contrastive learning. Then, individual trajectories are partitioned into atomic sub-sequences that encode transitions between disease states. These are clustered using a newly introduced distance metric. In quantitative experiments we found our method yields temporal biomarkers that are predictive of conversion to late AMD. Furthermore, these clusters were highly interpretable to ophthalmologists who confirmed that many of the clusters represent dynamics that have previously been linked to the progression of AMD, even though they are currently not included in any clinical grading system.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 12583
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 15729
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bird, A.C., et al.: An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Surv. Ophthalmol.39(5), 367–374 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, K.G., et al.: Longitudinal study of dark adaptation as a functional outcome measure for age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology126(6) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., Hinton, G.: A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In: ICML, pp. 1597–1607. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cuturi, M., Blondel, M.: Soft-dtw: a differentiable loss function for time-series. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 894–903. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dmitrenko, A., et al.: Self-supervised learning for analysis of temporal and morphological drug effects in cancer cell imaging data. In: Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferris, F.L., et al.: A simplified severity scale for age-related macular degeneration. Arch. Ophthalmol.123(11), 1570–1574 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferris III, F.L., Wilkinson, C., Bird, A., Chakravarthy, U., Chew, E., Csaky, K., Sadda, S.R., for Macular Research Classification Committee, B.I., et al.: Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 120(4) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grill, J.B., et al.: Bootstrap your own latent-a new approach to self-supervised learning. NeurIPS33, 21271–21284 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holland, R., et al.: Metadata-enhanced contrastive learning from retinal optical coherence tomography images. CoRR abs/2208.02529 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klein, R., et al.: Harmonizing the classification of age-related macular degeneration in the three-continent AMD consortium21(1), 14–23 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, J.G., et al.: Trajectory clustering: a partition-and-group framework. In: ACM SIGMOD, pp. 593–604 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell, P., et al.: Age-related macular degeneration. The Lancet392(10153), 1147–1159 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadda, S.R., et al.: Consensus definition for atrophy associated with age-related macular degeneration on oct: classification of atrophy report 3. Ophthalmology125(4), 537–548 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakoe, H.: Dynamic-programming approach to continuous speech recognition. In: 1971 Proc. the International Congress of Acoustics, Budapest (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sakoe, H., Chiba, S.: Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process.26(1), 43–49 (1978)

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schlanitz, F.G., et al.: Drusen volume development over time and its relevance to the course of age-related macular degeneration. BJO101(2), 198–203 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlegl, T., et al.: f-anogan: fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks. Med. Image Anal.54, 30–44 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seeböck, P., et al.: Unsupervised identification of disease marker candidates in retinal oct imaging data. IEEE TMI38(4), 1037–1047 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steinberg, J.S., et al.: Longitudinal analysis of reticular drusen associated with geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. IOVS54(6), 4054–4060 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sutton, J., et al.: Developing and validating a multivariable prediction model which predicts progression of intermediate to late age-related macular degeneration-the pinnacle trial protocol. Eye, pp. 1–9 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vogel, J.W., et al.: Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med.27(5), 871–881 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Von Luxburg, U.: A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat. Comput.17, 395–416 (2007)

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Waldstein, S.M., et al.: Unbiased identification of novel subclinical imaging biomarkers using unsupervised deep learning. Sci. Rep.10(1), 1–9 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong, W.L., et al.: Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health2(2), e106–e116 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Young, A.L., et al.: A data-driven model of biomarker changes in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Brain137(9), 2564–2577 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, A., et al.: Prognostic imaging biomarker discovery in survival analysis for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In: MICCAI Proceedings, pp. 223–233. Springer (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16449-1_22

  27. Zheng, Q., et al.: Pathological cluster identification by unsupervised analysis in 3,822 UK biobank cardiac MRIS. Front. Cardiovasc. Med7, 539788 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The PINNACLE study is funded by a Wellcome Trust Collaborative Award (ref. 210572/Z/18/Z). This work is also funded by the Munich Center for Machine Learning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. BioMedIA, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Robbie Holland, Johannes C. Paetzold, Daniel Rueckert & Martin J. Menten

  2. Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Oliver Leingang, Sophie Riedl, Hrvoje Bogunović & Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth

  3. Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

    Christopher Holmes & Sobha Sivaprasad

  4. Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Philipp Anders & Hendrik P. N. Scholl

  5. Department of Ophthalmology, Universitat Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Hendrik P. N. Scholl

  6. Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Rebecca Kaye & Andrew J. Lotery

  7. Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Ivan Ezhov, Daniel Rueckert & Martin J. Menten

Authors
  1. Robbie Holland

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oliver Leingang

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher Holmes

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philipp Anders

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rebecca Kaye

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sophie Riedl

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Johannes C. Paetzold

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ivan Ezhov

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hrvoje Bogunović

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hendrik P. N. Scholl

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sobha Sivaprasad

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. Andrew J. Lotery

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  14. Daniel Rueckert

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  15. Martin J. Menten

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRobbie Holland.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, NYC, NY, USA, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Hayit Greenspan

  2. Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Anant Madabhushi

  3. Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

    Parvin Mousavi

  4. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Septimiu Salcudean

  5. Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    James Duncan

  6. IBM Research, San Jose, CA, USA

    Tanveer Syeda-Mahmood

  7. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Russell Taylor

1Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Holland, R.et al. (2023). Clustering Disease Trajectories in Contrastive Feature Space for Biomarker Proposal in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. In: Greenspan, H.,et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023. MICCAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43990-2_68

Download citation

Publish with us

Societies and partnerships

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 12583
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 15729
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp