1. Alizon, S., de Roode, J.C., Michalakis, Y.: Multiple infections and the evolution of virulence. Ecol. Lett.16(4), 556–567 (2013)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Anyansi, C., Straub, T.J., Manson, A.L., Earl, A.M., Abeel, T.: Computational methods for strain-level microbial detection in colony and metagenome sequencing data. Front. Microbiol.11, 1925 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Balmer, O., Tanner, M.: Prevalence and implications of multiple-strain infections. Lancet Infect. Dis.11(11), 868–878 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Beghini, F., et al.: Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with biobakery 3. Elife10, e65088 (2021)

   Google Scholar 

5. Bray, N.L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P., Pachter, L.: Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol.34(5), 525–527 (2016)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Centrifuge.https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/centrifuge/

7. Da Silva, K., Pons, N., Berland, M., Oñate, F.P., Almeida, M., Peterlongo, P.: Strainflair: Strain-level profiling of metagenomic samples using variation graphs. PeerJ9, e11884 (2021)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. van Dijk, L.R., et al.: Strainge: A toolkit to track and characterize low-abundance strains in complex microbial communities. Genome Biol.23(1), 1–27 (2022)

   Google Scholar 

9. Ferragina, P., Manzini, G.: Opportunistic data structures with applications. In: Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 390–398. IEEE (2000)

   Google Scholar 

10. Freitas, T.A.K., Li, P.E., Scholz, M.B., Chain, P.S.: Accurate read-based metagenome characterization using a hierarchical suite of unique signatures. Nucl. Acids Res.43(10), e69–e69 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Gagie, T., Navarro, G., Prezza, N.: Optimal-time text indexing in BWT-runs bounded space. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1459–1477. SIAM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

12. Hamady, M., Knight, R.: Microbial community profiling for human microbiome projects: Tools, techniques, and challenges. Genome Res.19(7), 1141–1152 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Huang, W., Li, L., Myers, J.R., Marth, G.T.: Art: A next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics28(4), 593–594 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Kim, D., Song, L., Breitwieser, F.P., Salzberg, S.L.: Centrifuge: Rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res.26(12), 1721–1729 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Kuhnle, A., Mun, T., Boucher, C., Gagie, T., Langmead, B., Manzini, G.: Efficient construction of a complete index for pan-genomics read alignment. J. Comput. Biol.27(4), 500–513 (2020)

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Li, H.: WGSIM - simulating sequence reads from a reference genome.https://github.com/lh3/wgsim (2011)

17. Li, H., et al.: The sequence alignment/map format and samtools. Bioinformatics25(16), 2078–2079 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

18. Lu, J., Breitwieser, F.P., Thielen, P., Salzberg, S.L.: Bracken: Estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Comput. Sci.3, e104 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. McIntyre, A.B., et al.: Comprehensive benchmarking and ensemble approaches for metagenomic classifiers. Genome Biol.18(1), 1–19 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

20. McIver, L.J., et al.: Biobakery: A meta’omic analysis environment. Bioinformatics34(7), 1235–1237 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

21. MetaPhlAn2.https://github.com/biobakery/MetaPhlAn2

22. Neelakanta, G., Sultana, H.: The use of metagenomic approaches to analyze changes in microbial communities. Microbiol. Insights6, MBI-S10819 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

23. Nikulin, M.S., et al.: Hellinger distance. Encyclopedia Math.78 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

24. O’Leary, N.A., et al.: Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: Current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucl. Acids Res.44(D1), D733–D745 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

25. Petri, M.: Fm-index-compressed full-text index.https://github.com/mpetri/FM-Index (2015)

26. Roberts, A., Pachter, L.: Streaming fragment assignment for real-time analysis of sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods10(1), 71–73 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Roosaare, M., et al.: Strainseeker: Fast identification of bacterial strains from raw sequencing reads using user-provided guide trees. PeerJ5, e3353 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

28. Scholz, M., et al.: Strain-level microbial epidemiology and population genomics from shotgun metagenomics. Nat. Methods13(5), 435–438 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

29. Simon, H.Y., Siddle, K.J., Park, D.J., Sabeti, P.C.: Benchmarking metagenomics tools for taxonomic classification. Cell178(4), 779–794 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Sims, G.E., Jun, S.R., Wu, G.A., Kim, S.H.: Alignment-free genome comparison with feature frequency profiles (FFP) and optimal resolutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.106(8), 2677–2682 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Truong, D.T., et al.: Metaphlan2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat. Methods12(10), 902–903 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

32. Wood, D.E., Lu, J., Langmead, B.: Improved metagenomic analysis with kraken 2. Genome Biol.20(1), 1–13 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Wood, D.E., Salzberg, S.L.: Kraken: Ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol.15(3), 1–12 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Walia, V., Saipradeep, V.G., Srinivasan, R., Sivadasan, N.: Supplementary Materials: MAGE (2023).https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7746145

Download references