1. Hamilton, E., Hobbs, W.: Epistemic frames and political discourse modeling. In: Ruis, A.R., Lee, S.B. (eds.) ICQE 2021. CCIS, vol. 1312, pp. 32–46. Springer, Cham (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_3

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

2. Karadenizova, Z., Dahle, K.-P.: Analyze this! Thematic analysis: hostility, attribution of intent, and interpersonal perception bias. J. Interpersonal Violence, 0886260517739890 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

3. TenHouten, W.D.: Anger, social power, and cognitive appraisal: application of octonionic sociocognitive emotion theory. J. Polit. Power12(1), 40–65 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Sanfey, A.G., et al.: The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science300(5626), 1755–1758 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Dawes, C.T., et al.: Neural basis of egalitarian behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.109(17), 6479–6483 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: Epistemic network analysis: a worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In: Handbook of Learning Analytics (2017)

   Google Scholar 

7. Rice, J.: Algorithmic outrage. Comput. Compos.57, 102582 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Jacobs, K., Sandberg, L., Spierings, N.: Twitter and Facebook: populists’ double-barreled gun? New Media Soc.22(4), 611–633 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Hamblin, J.: My Outrage is Better than Your Outrage. Atlantic, vol. 31 (2015)

   Google Scholar 

10. Zettle, R.D., Hayes, S.C.: Rule-governed behavior: a potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavioral therapy (2016)

    Google Scholar 

11. Jemal, A., Bussey, S., Young, B.: Steps to racial reconciliation: a movement to bridge the racial divide and restore humanity. Soc. Work Christianity47(1) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

12. Shnabel, N., et al.: Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: the needs-based model of reconciliation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull.35(8), 1021–1030 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Nadler, A., Shnabel, N.: Instrumental and socioemotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the needs-based model of socioemotional reconciliation. In: The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation (2008)

    Google Scholar 

14. Shaffer, D.: Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Comput. Educ.46(3), 223–234 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Murphy, P.K., et al.: Examining epistemic frames in conceptual change research: implications for learning and instruction. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev.13(3), 475–486 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Nash, P., Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic youth development: Educational games as youth development activities, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2012)

    Google Scholar 

17. Mullen, C.A., et al.: An epistemic frame analysis of neoliberal culture and politics in the US, UK, and the UAE. Interchange43(3), 187–228 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic games to improve professional skills and values. Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development, Paris (2007)

    Google Scholar 

19. Hart, W., et al.: Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psych. Bull.135(4), 555 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Shaffer, D.W., et al.: Epistemic network analysis: a prototype for 21st century assessment of learning. Int. J. Learn. Media1(1), 1–21 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

21. Wooldridge, A.R., et al.: Quantifying the qualitative with epistemic network analysis: a human factors case study of task-allocation communication in a primary care team. IISE Trans. Healthc. Syst. Eng.8(1), 72–82 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Wisconsin Center for Education Research: Epistemic Analytics Website (2022). Software download athttp://epistemicnetwork.org

23. Orrill, C.H., Shaffer, D.W.: Exploring connectedness: applying ENA to teacher knowledge. In: International Conference of the Learning Sciences (2012)

    Google Scholar 

24. Brader, T.: The political relevance of emotions: “reassessing” revisited. Polit. Psychol.32(2), 337–346 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Gross, J.J., Feldman Barrett, L.: Emotion generation and emotion regulation: one or two depends on your point of view. Emot. Rev.3(1), 8–16 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

26. Gratch, J., Marsella, S.: A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Cogn. Syst. Res.5(4), 269–306 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Zinchenko, A., et al.: Moving towards dynamics: emotional modulation of cognitive and emotional control. Int. J. Psychophysiol.147, 193–201 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Luo, J., Yu, R.: Follow the heart or the head? The interactive influence model of emotion and cognition. Front. Psychol.6(573) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

29. Zmigrod, L., et al.: The psychological roots of intellectual humility: the role of intelligence and cognitive flexibility. Pers. Individ. Differ.141, 200–208 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Xia, L., Kukar-Kinney, M.: Examining the penalty resolution process: building loyalty through gratitude and fairness. J. Serv. Res.16(4), 518–532 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)

    Google Scholar 

32. Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.R.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal.3(3), 9–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In: Handbook of Learning Analytics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

34. Marquart, C.L., Hinojosa, C., Swiecki, Z., Eagan, B., Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic Network Analysis (Version 1.7.0) [Software] (2018).http://app.epistemicnetwork.org

35. Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., et al.: In search of conversational grain size: modeling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal.4(3), 123–139 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

36. Arastoopour, G., et al.: Epistemic Network Analysis as a tool for engineering design assessment. In: American Society for Engineering Education (2015)

    Google Scholar 

37. Sullivan, S., et al.: Using epistemic network analysis to identify targets for educational interventions in trauma team communication. Surgery163(4), 938–943 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references