1. Bettina, J., Baudilio, M., Daniel, M., Alajandro, B., Michiel, S.: Challenges to effective EU cybersecurity policy. European Court of Auditors, pp. 1–74 (2019)

   Google Scholar 

2. Gerling, R.: Cyber Attacks on Free Elections. MaxPlanckResearch, pp. 10–15 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

3. World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2020. Insight Report, pp. 1–114 (2020). 978-1-944835-15-6.http://wef.ch/risks2019

4. Ponemon Institute. 2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: Impact of Business Continuity Management (2018).https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/AEJYBPWA

5. Katsumi, N.: Global Threat Intelligence Report Note from our CEO. NTT Security (2019)

   Google Scholar 

6. Chi, C., Freeman, D.: Machine Learning and Security. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2018)

   Google Scholar 

7. Kapersky. Project TajMahal a new sophisticated APT framework. Kapersky (2019).https://securelist.com/project-tajmahal/90240/

8. CyberEdge Group. Cyberthreat Defense Report. CyberEdge Group (2019).https://cyber-edge.com/

9. Hanan, H., et al.: A Taxonomy and Survey of Intrusion Detection System Design Techniques, Network Threats and Datasets. ACM (2018).http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03517

10. Mazel, J., Casas, P., Fontugne, R., Fukuda, K., Owezarski, P.: Hunting attacks in the dark: clustering and correlation analysis for unsupervised anomaly detection. Int. J. Netw. Manag. 283–305 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.1903

11. Khraisat, A., Gondal, I., Vamplew, P., Kamruzzaman, J.: Survey of intrusion detection systems: techniques, datasets and challenges. Cybersecurity2(1), 1–22 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-019-0038-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Yao, D., Shu, X., Cheng, L., Stolfo, S.: Anomaly Detection as a Service: Challenges, Advances, and Opportunities. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

13. KDD. KDD-CUP-99 Task Description (1999).https://kdd.ics.uci.edu/databases/kddcup99/ task.html

14. Sharafaldin, I., Habibi, A., Ghorbani, A.: Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization. In: ICISSP 2018 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy, pp. 108–116 (2018).https://doi.org/10.5220/0006639801080116

15. Ring, M., Wunderlich, S., Scheuring, D., Landes, D., Hotho, A.: A survey of network-based intrusion detection data sets. Comput. Secur. 147–167 (2019).https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00053.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.06.005

16. Ullah, R., Zhang, X., Kumar, R., Amiri, N., Alazab, M.: An adaptive multi-layer botnet detection technique using machine learning classifiers. Appl. Sci.9(11), 2375 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Magán-Carrión, R., Urda, D., Díaz-Cano, I., Dorronsoro, B.: Towards a reliable comparison and evaluation of network intrusion detection systems based on machine learning. Appl. Sci. (2020).https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051775

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Qiu, S., Liu, Q., Zhou, S., Wu, C.: Review of artificial intelligence adversarial attack and defense technologies. Appl. Sci. (2019).https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050909

19. Carlini, N., et al.: On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness (2019).https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06705

20. Ullaha, F., Babara, M.: Architectural tactics for big data cybersecurity analytics systems: a review. J. Syst. Softw.151, 81–118 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Chadwick, D., et al.: A cloud-edge based data security architecture for sharing and analysing cyber threat information. Future Gener. Comput. Syst.102, 710–722 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.06.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Menen, A., Gowtham, R.: An efficient ransomware detection system. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 28–31 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

23. Narayanan, S., Ganesan, S., Joshi, K., Oates, T., Joshi, A., Finin, T.: Cognitive Techniques for Early Detection of Cybersecurity Events (2018).http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00116

24. Ravi, S., Jassi, J., Avdhesh, S., Sharma, R.: Data-mining a mechanism against cyber threats: a review. In: 2016 1st International Conference on Innovation and Challenges in Cyber Security, ICICCS 2016, pp. 45–48 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCS.2016.7542343

25. Daya, A., Salahuddin, M., Limam, N., Boutaba, R.: A graph-based machine learning approach for bot detection. In: 2019 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management, IM 2019, pp. 144–152 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

26. Ullah, R., Zhang, X., Kumar, R., Amiri, N., Alazab, M.: An adaptive multi-layer botnet detection technique using machine learning classifiers. Appl. Sci.9(11), 2375 (2019).https://doi.org/10.3390/app9112375

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Le, T., Kim, Y., Kim, H.: Network intrusion detection based on novel feature selection model and various recurrent neural networks. Appl. Sci.9(7), 1392 (2019).https://doi.org/10.3390/app9071392

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Zhou, Q.: Dimitrios Pezaros School. Evaluation of Machine Learning Classifiers for Zero-Day Intrusion Detection - An Analysis on CIC-AWS-2018 dataset (2019).https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.03685

29. Khraisat, A., Gondal, I., Vamplew, P., Kamruzzaman, J., Alazab, A.: Hybrid intrusion detection system based on the stacking ensemble of C5 decision tree classifier and one class support vector machine. Electronics9(1), 173 (2020).https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9010173

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Liu, W., Ci, L., Liu, L.: A new method of fuzzy support vector machine algorithm for intrusion detection. Appl. Sci.10(3), 1065 (2020).https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031065

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Gao, M., Ma, L., Liu, H., Zhang, Z., Ning, Z., Xu, J.: Malicious network traffic detection based on deep neural networks and association analysis. Sensors20, 1–14 (2020).https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051452

32. Gonzalez-Cuautle, D., et al.: Synthetic minority oversampling technique for optimizing classification tasks in botnet and intrusion-detection-system datasets. Appl. Sci.10(3), 794 (2020).https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030794

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Sarnovsky, M., Paralic, J.: Hierarchical intrusion detection using machine learning and knowledge model. Symmetry12, 1–14 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Wang, M., Lu, Y., Qin, J.: A dynamic MLP-based DDoS attack detection method using feature selection and feedback. Comput. Secur.88, 1–14 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2019.101645

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Kumar, S., Rahman, M.: Effects of machine learning approach in flow-based anomaly detection on software-defined networking. Symmetry12(1), 7 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Hwang, R., Peng, M., Nguyen, V., Chang, Y.: An LSTM-based deep learning approach for classifying malicious traffic at the packet level. Appl. Sci.9(16), 3414 (2019).https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163414

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Kwon, H., Kim, Y., Yoon, H., Choi, D.: Random untargeted adversarial example on Deep neural network. Symmetry10(12), 738 (2018).https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120738

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Anirban, C., Manaar, A., Vishal, D., Anupam, C., Debdeep, M.: Adversarial attacks and defences: a survey. IEEE Access 35365–35381 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2836950

39. Ibitoye, O., Abou-Khamis, R., Matrawy, A., Shafi, M.: The Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning in Network Security - A Survey (2019).https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02621

40. Niyaz, Q., Sun, W., Javaid, A., Alam, M.: A deep learning approach for network intrusion detection system. In: 9th EAI International Conference on Bio-Inspired Information and Communications Technologies, pp. 1–11, May 2016

    Google Scholar 

41. Guo, W., Mu, D., Xu, J., Su, P., Wang, G., Xing, X.: Lemna: explaining deep learning based security applications. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Toronto, ON, Canada, 15 October 2018, pp. 364–379 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

42. Nathan, S., Tran, N., Vu, P., Qi, S.: A deep learning approach to network intrusion detection. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell.2, 41–50 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2017.2772792

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Abbas, S.A., Almhanna, M.S.: Distributed denial of service attacks detection system by machine learning based on dimensionality reduction. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1804(1), 012136 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1804/1/012136

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Gupta, N., Jindal, V., Bedi, P.: LIO-IDS: handling class imbalance using LSTM and improved one-vs-one technique in intrusion detection system. Comput. Netw.192, 108076 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108076

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Liu, X., Li, T., Zhang, R., Wu, D., Liu, Y., Yang, Z.: A GAN and Feature Selection-Based Oversampling Technique for Intrusion Detection (2021)

    Google Scholar 

46. Maseer, Z.K., Yusof, R., Bahaman, N., Mostafa, S.A., Foozy, C.F.M.: Benchmarking of machine learning for anomaly based intrusion detection systems in the CICIDS2017 dataset. IEEE Access9, 22351–22370 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3056614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references