- Claudio Álvarez13,14,
- Gustavo Zurita15,
- Antonio Farías15,
- César Collazos16,
- Juan Manuel González-Calleros17,
- Manuel Yunga18 &
- …
- Álvaro Pezoa19
Part of the book series:Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13632))
Included in the following conference series:
624Accesses
Abstract
Ethics education is essential in business and STEM curricula. For decades up to the present day, a rationalist conception of ethics has been highly influential in its pedagogy. However, in the past twenty years, developments in moral psychology and neuroscience support that moral thought and deliberation are guided by a dual process initiated by intuition. In this research, we present the design of a scaffolding for ethics teaching based on groupware with individual and collaborative activities, informed by the Social Intuitionist Model (SIM) and Moral Foundations Theory (MFT). We conducted an exploratory study based on an original case about academic ethics, involving student samples in five higher education institutions in four countries (N = 249). Results indicate that ethical reasoning, initially guided by intuition, can be influenced by facts, reflective questions, and social interaction. Students regardless of their initial intuitive stance about an eliciting situation, and their moral sensitivity according to MFT, changed their final decision on the situation significantly by the end of the intervention according to a Wilcoxon signed rank test (p < 0.001). About 30% of the sample swung to a stance opposite to what they decided at the outset of the intervention. A question that stems from this research is how students’ ethical thinking could be scaffolded and oriented, both pedagogically and technology-wise, towards identifying and standing for solutions to ethical dilemmas that are based on virtue and bring greater good.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 8579
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Softcover Book
- JPY 10724
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pfeffer, J., Fong, C.T.: The business school ‘business’: some lessons from the US experience. J. Manage. Stud.41(8), 1501–1520 (2004)
Holsapple, M.A., et al.: Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineering ethics education delivery. J. Eng. Educ.101(2), 169–186 (2012)
Haidt, J.: The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev.108(4), 814 (2001)
Haidt, J.: Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. J. Moral Educ.42(3), 281–297 (2013)
Graham, J., et al.: Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 55–130. Elsevier (2013)
Hess, J.L., Fore, G.: A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Sci. Eng. Ethics24(2), 551–583 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6
Poje, T., Zaman Groff, M.: Mapping ethics education in accounting research: a bibliometric analysis. J. Bus. Ethics179, 451–472 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04846-9
Cornelius, N., Wallace, J., Tassabehji, R.: An analysis of corporate social responsibility, corporate identity and ethics teaching in business schools. J. Bus. Ethics76(1), 117–135 (2007).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9271-6
Loeb, S.E.: Active learning: an advantageous yet challenging approach to accounting ethics instruction. J. Bus. Ethics127(1), 221–230 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2027-1
Jeffries, C., Maeder, D.W.: Using instructional and assessment vignettes to promote recall, recognition, and transfer in educational psychology courses. Teach. Educ. Psychol.1(2), n2 (2006)
Impagliazzo, J., Gorgone, J.: Professional accreditation of information systems programs. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst.9(1), 3 (2002)
Kulturel-Konak, S., et al.: Assessing professional skills in STEM disciplines. In: 2013 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). IEEE (2013)
Kohlberg, L.: Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, vol. 347, p. 480 (1969)
Andersen, M.L., Zuber, J.M., Hill, B.D.: Moral foundations theory: An exploratory study with accounting and other business students. J. Bus. Ethics132(3), 525–538 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2362-x
Andersen, M.L., Klamm, B.K.: Haidt’s social intuitionist model: what are the implications for accounting ethics education? J. Account. Educ.44, 35–46 (2018)
Alvarez, C., Zurita, G., Baloian, N., Jerez, O., Peñafiel, S.: A CSCL script for supporting moral reasoning in the ethics classroom. In: Nakanishi, H., Egi, H., Chounta, I.-A., Takada, H., Ichimura, S., Hoppe, U. (eds.) CRIWG+CollabTech 2019. LNCS, vol. 11677, pp. 62–79. Springer, Cham (2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28011-6_5
Alvarez, C., Zurita, G., Carvallo, A., Ramírez, P., Bravo, E., Baloian, N.: Automatic content analysis of student moral discourse in a collaborative learning activity. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Hishiyama, R., Zurita, G., Weyers, B., Nolte, A., Ogata, H. (eds.) CollabTech 2021. LNCS, vol. 12856, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85071-5_1
Alvarez, C., et al.: A social platform for fostering ethical education through role-playing. In: Factoring Ethics in Technology, Policy Making, Regulation and AI, p. 107 (2021)
Montiel, I., et al.: New ways of teaching: using technology and mobile apps to educate on societal grand challenges. J. Bus. Ethics161(2), 243–251 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04184-x
Gilligan, C.: In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press (1993)
Haidt, J., Joseph, C.: The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The Innate Mind3, 367–391 (2007)
Rosseel, Y.: lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw.48, 1–36 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
Claudio Álvarez
Centro de Investigación en Educación, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
Claudio Álvarez
Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Gustavo Zurita & Antonio Farías
Departamento de Sistemas, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia
César Collazos
Facultad de Ciencias de la Computación, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
Juan Manuel González-Calleros
Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador
Manuel Yunga
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
Álvaro Pezoa
- Claudio Álvarez
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Gustavo Zurita
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Antonio Farías
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- César Collazos
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Juan Manuel González-Calleros
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Manuel Yunga
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Álvaro Pezoa
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toClaudio Álvarez.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Lung-Hsiang Wong
Ritsumeikan University, Osaka, Japan
Yugo Hayashi
Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia
Cesar A. Collazos
Universidad de Los Andes, Santiago, Chile
Claudio Alvarez
University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
Gustavo Zurita
University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
Nelson Baloian
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Álvarez, C.et al. (2022). Scaffolding of Intuitionist Ethical Reasoning with Groupware: Do Students’ Stances Change in Different Countries?. In: Wong, LH., Hayashi, Y., Collazos, C.A., Alvarez, C., Zurita, G., Baloian, N. (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CollabTech 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13632. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_18
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Springer, Cham
Print ISBN:978-3-031-20217-9
Online ISBN:978-3-031-20218-6
eBook Packages:Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
Share this paper
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative