1. Chan, K., Liebowitz, J.: The synergy of social network analysis and knowledge mapping: a case study. Int. J. Manage. Decis. Making7(1), 19–35 (2006)

   Google Scholar 

2. Ji-Yeon, S., et al.: Resource-aware smart home management system by constructing resource relation graph. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electr.57(3), 1112–1119 (2011)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Dhand, A., et al.: Social network structure and composition in former NFL football players. Sci. Rep.11(1), 1–9 (2021)

   Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

4. Block, P., et al.: Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world. Nature Hum. Behav.46, 588–596 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Blondel, V.D., et al.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp.2008(10), P10008 (2008)

   Google Scholar 

6. Gregory, S.: Finding overlapping communities in networks by label propagation. New J. Phys.12(10), 103018 (2010)

   Article MATH  Google Scholar 

7. Acharya, D.B., Zhang, H.: Community detection clustering via gumbel softmax. SN Comput. Sci.1(5), 1–11 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00264-2

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Wu, X., et al.: A survey of algorithms for privacy-preservation of graphs and social networks (2010)

   Google Scholar 

9. Wang, Y., Wu, X., Wu, L.: Differential privacy preserving spectral graph analysis. In: Pei, J., Tseng, V.S., Cao, L., Motoda, H., Xu, G. (eds.) PAKDD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7819, pp. 329–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37456-2_28

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

10. Dimple, M.A., Smit, T.: A review paper on privacy preservation of data mining using randomization response technique

    Google Scholar 

11. Xuan, D., et al.: De-anonymizing dynamic social networks. In: Proceedings of the Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2011, 5–9 December 2011, Houston, Texas, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

12. Mülle, Y., Clifton, C., Böhm, K.: Privacy-integrated graph clustering through differential privacy. In: EDBT/ICDT Workshops, vol. 157 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

13. Qin, Z., et al.: Generating synthetic decentralized social graphs with local differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 425–438 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

14. Yang, M., et al.: Local differential privacy and its applications: a comprehensive survey. arXiv preprintarXiv:2008.03686 (2020)

15. Pinot, R., et al.: Graph-based clustering under differential privacy (2018)

    Google Scholar 

16. Paillier, P.: Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes. In: Proceedings of EUROCRYPT’99, Czech Republic, May 1999

    Google Scholar 

17. Hardy, S., et al.: Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryption (2017)

    Google Scholar 

18. ZhouJian, B., Pei, J.: The k-anonymity and l-diversity approaches for privacy preservation in social networks against neighborhood attacks. In: Knowledge Information Systems (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-010-0311-2

19. Praveena, A., Smys, S.: Anonymization in social networks: a survey on the issues of data privacy in social network sites. J. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci.5(3), 15912–15918 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

20. Mohapatra, D., Patra, M.R.: Anonymization of attributed social graph using anatomy based clustering. Multimedia Tools Appl.78(18), 25455–25486 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Yuan, W., et al.: Edge-dual graph preserving sign prediction for signed social networks. IEEE Access5, 19383–19392 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Qian, J., et al.: Social network de-anonymization and privacy inference with knowledge graph model. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput.16(4), 679–692 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

23. Shao, Y., et al.: Fast de-anonymization of social networks with structural information. In: Data Sci. Eng.4, 76–92 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

24. Sala, A., et al.: Sharing graphs using differentially private graph models. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, pp. 81–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

25. Mir, D., Wright, R.N: A differentially private estimator for the stochastic kronecker graph model. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint EDBT/ICDT Workshops, pp. 167–176 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

26. Xiao, Q., Chen, R., Tan, K.-L.: Differentially private network data release via structural inference. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 911–920 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

27. Nobari, S., et al.: L-opacity: linkage-aware graph anonymization (2014)

    Google Scholar 

28. Nguyen, H.H., Imine, A., Rusinowitch, M.: Detecting communities under differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pp. 83–93 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

29. Ye, Q., et al.: LF-GDPR: a framework for estimating graph metrics with local differential privacy. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.34, 4905–4920 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Zhang, Z.: LDPCD: a novel method for locally differentially private community detection. Comput. Intell. Neurosci.2022 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

31. Chen, Z., Zheng, Z., Liu, X., Guo, W.: Privacy-preserving computation tookit on floating-point numbers. In: Xiong, J., Wu, S., Peng, C., Tian, Y. (eds.) MobiMedia 2021. LNICST, vol. 394, pp. 462–476. Springer, Cham (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89814-4_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

32. Bost, R., et al.: Machine learning classification over encrypted data. In: NDSS, Vol. 4324, p. 4325 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

33. Grivet, S.A., et al.: SPEED: secure, PrivatE, and efficient deep learning. Mach. Learn.110(4), 675–694 (2021)

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

34. Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev.E 69(2), 26113 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references