1. Brunnström, K., et al.: Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience. In: Fifth Qualinet Meeting, Novi Sad (2013)

   Google Scholar 

2. ITU-T, Rec. ITU-T P.10/G.100: Vocabulary for performance, quality of service and quality of experience (2017)

   Google Scholar 

3. ITU-T. Rec. ITU-T G.1035: Influencing factors on quality of experience for virtual reality services (2020)

   Google Scholar 

4. Reiter, U., et al.: Factors influencing quality of experience. In: Möller, S., Raake, A. (eds.) Quality of Experience. TSTS, pp. 55–72. Springer, Cham (2014).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_4

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

5. Burbeck, C.A., Kelly, D.H.: Spatiotemporal characteristics of visual mechanisms: excitatory-inhibitory model. J. Opt. Soc. Am.70(9), 1121–1126 (1980)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Greenberg, S., Ainsworth, W.A.: Speech processing in the auditory system: an overview. In: Speech Processing in the Auditory System. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol. 18. Springer, NY (2004).https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21575-1_1

7. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol.3(3), 203–220 (1993)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Schatz, R., Hoßfeld, T., Janowski, L., Egger, S.: From packets to people: quality of experience as a new measurement challenge. In: Biersack, E., Callegari, C., Matijasevic, M. (eds.) Data Traffic Monitoring and Analysis. LNCS, vol. 7754, pp. 219–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36784-7_10

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

9. Takahash, A.: Framework and standardization of quality of experience (QoE) design and management for audiovisual communication services. NTT Tech. Rev.7(4), 1–5 (2009)

   Google Scholar 

10. ITU-T, Rec. ITU-T P.800.1: Mean Opinion Score (MOS) Terminology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

11. Alreshoodi, M.A., Woods, J.C.: Survey on QoE/QoS correlation models for multimedia services. Int. J. Distrib. Parallel Syst.4(3) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

12. Zhang, Y., et al.: Subjective panoramic video quality assessment database for coding applications. IEEE Trans. Broadcast.64(2), 461–473 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. ITU-T, Rec. ITU-T P.910: Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

14. ITU-T, Rec. ITU-T P.919: Subjective test methodologies for 360º video on head-mounted displays (2020)

    Google Scholar 

15. Singla, A., Robitza, W., Raake, A.: Comparison of subjective quality test methods for omnidirectional video quality evaluation. In: Proceedings of the MMSP 2019, Kuala Lumpur (2019)

    Google Scholar 

16. Kim, H.K., Park, J., Choi, Y., Choe, M.: Virtual reality sickness questionnaire (VRSQ): motion sickness measurement index in a virtual reality environment. Appl. Ergon.69, 66–73 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Perez, P., Oyaga, N., Ruiz, J.J., Villegas, A.: Towards systematic analysis of cybersickness in high motion omnidirectional video. In: Proceedings of the QoMEX 2018, Cagliari (2018)

    Google Scholar 

18. David, E.J., Gutiérrez, J., Coutrot, A., Da Silva, M.P., Le Callet, P.: A dataset of head and eye movements for 360° videos. In: Proceedings of the MMSys 2018, Amsterdam (2018)

    Google Scholar 

19. Wang, Y., Zhang, P.: QoE Management in Wireless Networks, Springer, NY (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42454-5

20. ITU-T, Rec. ITU-T G.1011: Reference guide to quality of experience assessment methodologies (2016)

    Google Scholar 

21. Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., Tran-Gia, P.: A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Netw.24(2), 36–41 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Juluri, P., Tamarapalli, V., Medhi, D.: Measurement of quality of experience of video-on-demand services: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.18(1), 401–418 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Song, W., Tjondronegoro, D.W., Docherty, M.J.: Understanding user experience of mobile video: framework, measurement, and optimization. In: Mobile Multimedia - User and Technology Perspectives, InTech, Rijeka, pp. 3–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

24. Vega, M.T., Perra, C., De Turck, F., Liotta, A.: A review of predictive quality of experience management in video streaming services. IEEE Trans. Broadcast.64(2), 432–445 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Ruan, J., Xie, D.: A survey on QoE-oriented VR video streaming: some research issues and challenges. Electronics10(17), 2155 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Liu, Y., Yang, L., Xu, M., Wang, Z.: Rate control schemes for panoramic video coding. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent.53, 76–85 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Zakharchenko, V., Choi, K.P., Park, J.H.: Quality metric for spherical panoramic video. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Optics + Photonics 2016, San Diego, CA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

28. Chen, S., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, Z.: Spherical structural similarity index for objective omnidirectional video quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ICME 2018, San Diego, CA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

29. Tataria, H., Shafi, M., Molisch, A.F., Dohler, M., Sjöland, H., Tufvesson, F.: 6G wireless systems: vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities. Proc. IEEE109(7), 1166–1199 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Clemm, A., Vega, M.T., Ravuri, H.K., Wauters, T., De Turck, F.: Toward truly immersive holographic-type communication: challenges and solutions. IEEE Commun. Mag.58(1), 93–99 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Shu, J., Chiu, M., Hui, P.: Emotion sensing for mobile computing. IEEE Commun. Mag.57(11), 84–90 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references