1. Bhandari, J., MacNeilage, P., Folmer, E.: Teleportation without spatial disorientation using optical flow cues. Presented at the, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2018).https://doi.org/10.20380/gi2018.22

2. Forte, J.L.B., Vela, F.L.G., Rodríguez, P.P.: User experience problems in immersive virtual environments. Presented at the, Donostia Gipuzkoa Spain June 25 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1145/3335595.3336288

3. Sayyad, E., Sra, M., Hollerer, T.: Walking and teleportation in wide-area virtual reality experiences. Presented at the , Recife/Porto de Galinhas November (2020).https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00088

4. Wallet, G., Sauzéon, H., Pala, P.A., Larrue, F., Zheng, X., N’Kaoua, B.: Virtual/real transfer of spatial knowledge: benefit from visual fidelity provided in a virtual environment and impact of active navigation. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw.14, 417–423 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0187

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Richardson, A.E., Powers, M.E., Bousquet, L.G.: Video game experience predicts virtual, but not real navigation performance. Comput. Hum. Behav.27, 552–560 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.003

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Richardson, A.E., Montello, D.R., Hegarty, M.: Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Mem. Cognit.27, 741–750 (1999).https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211566

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Waller, D., Hunt, E., Knapp, D.: The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ.7(2), 129-143 (1998).https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565631

8. Taube, J.S., Valerio, S., Yoder, R.M.: Is navigation in virtual reality with fMRI really navigation? J. Cogn. Neurosci.25, 1008–1019 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00386

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Ekstrom, A.D.: Why vision is important to how we navigate: human spatial navigation and vision. Hippocampus25, 731–735 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22449

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Ekstrom, A.D., Spiers, H.J., Bohbot, V.D., Rosenbaum, R.S.: Human Spatial Navigation. Princeton University Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

11. Lorenz, M., Busch, M., Rentzos, L., Tscheligi, M., Klimant, P., Frohlich, P.: I’m There! The influence of virtual reality and mixed reality environments combined with two different navigation methods on presence. Presented at the , Arles, Camargue, Provence, France 2015–3 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223376

12. Clemente, M., Rodríguez, A., Rey, B., Alcañiz, M.: Assessment of the influence of navigation control and screen size on the sense of presence in virtual reality using EEG. Expert Syst. Appl.41, 1584–1592 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Brade, J., Lorenz, M., Busch, M., Hammer, N., Tscheligi, M., Klimant, P.: Being there again – presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability and user experience using a mobile navigation task. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud.101, 76–87 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Cliburn, D., Winlock, T., Rilea, S., Van Donsel, M.: Dynamic landmark placement as a navigation aid in virtual worlds. Presented at the , Newport Beach, California (2007).https://doi.org/10.1145/1315184.1315225

15. Ruddle, R.A.: The effect of trails on first-time and subsequent navigation in a virtual environment. Presented at the , Bonn, Germany (2005).https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2005.1492761

16. Chrastil, E.R., Warren, W.H.: Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of survey knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.39, 1520–1537 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032382

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Fabroyir, H., Teng, W.-C.: Navigation in virtual environments using head-mounted displays: Allocentric vs. egocentric behaviors. Comput. Human Behav.80, 331-343 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.033

18. Walkowiak, S., Foulsham, T., Eardley, A.F.: Individual differences and personality correlates of navigational performance in the virtual route learning task. Comput. Hum. Behav.45, 402–410 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Moser, E.I., Moser, M.-B., McNaughton, B.L.: Spatial representation in the hippocampal formation: a history. Nat. Neurosci.20, 1448–1464 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4653

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Hardcastle, K., Ganguli, S., Giocomo, L.M.: Environmental boundaries as an error correction mechanism for grid cells. Neuron86, 827–839 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Krupic, J., Bauza, M., Burton, S., Barry, C., O’Keefe, J.: Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry. Nature518, 232–235 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14153

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Krupic, J., Bauza, M., Burton, S., O’Keefe, J.: Local transformations of the hippocampal cognitive map. Science359, 1143–1146 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4960

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Keinath, A.T., Epstein, R.A., Balasubramanian, V.: Environmental deformations dynamically shift the grid cell spatial metric. eLife.7, e38169 (2018).https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38169

24. Hinman, J.R., Chapman, G.W., Hasselmo, M.E.: Neuronal representation of environmental boundaries in egocentric coordinates. Nat Commun.10, 2772 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10722-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Bellmund, J.L.S., de Cothi, W., Ruiter, T.A., Nau, M., Barry, C., Doeller, C.F.: Deforming the metric of cognitive maps distorts memory. Nat Hum Behav.4, 177–188 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0767-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Graham, P., Cheng, K.: Ants use the panoramic skyline as a visual cue during navigation. Curr. Biol.19, R935–R937 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Lee, S.A., et al.: Electrophysiological signatures of spatial boundaries in the human subiculum. J. Neurosci.38, 3265–3272 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3216-17.2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Kelly, J.W., McNamara, T.P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T.H., Rieser, J.J.: The shape of human navigation: How environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation. Cognition109, 281–286 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Cheng, K., Newcombe, N.S.: Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence. Psychon. Bull. Rev.12, 1–23 (2005).https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196346

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Hartley, T., Trinkler, I., Burgess, N.: Geometric determinants of human spatial memory. Cognition94, 39–75 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. O’Keefe, J., Burgess, N.: Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature381(6581), 425–428 (1996).https://doi.org/10.1038/381425a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Sjölinder, M., Höök, K., Nilsson, L.-G., Andersson, G.: Age differences and the acquisition of spatial knowledge in a three-dimensional environment: evaluating the use of an overview map as a navigation aid. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud.63, 537–564 (2005).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Siegel, A.W., White, S.H.: The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Advances in Child Development and Behavior, pp. 9–55. Elsevier (1975)

    Google Scholar 

34. Dalton, R.C.: The secret is to follow your nose: route path selection and angularity. Environ. Behav.35, 107–131 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238867

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Zacharias, J.: Pedestrian behavior and perception in urban walking environments. J. Plan. Lit.16, 3–18 (2001).https://doi.org/10.1177/08854120122093249

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Sadalla, E.K., Montello, D.R.: Remembering changes in direction. Environ. Behav.21, 346–363 (1989).https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916589213006

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. D’Acci, L.: Aesthetical cognitive perceptions of urban street form. Pedestrian preferences towards straight or curvy route shapes. J. Urban Des.24(6), 896–912 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1554994

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Liu, B., Dong, W., Zhan, Z., Wang, S., Meng, L.: Differences in the gaze behaviours of pedestrians navigating between regular and irregular road patterns. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf.9, 45 (2020).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9010045

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Moffat, S.D., Zonderman, A.B., Resnick, S.M.: Age differences in spatial memory in a virtual environment navigation task. Neurobiol. Aging22, 787–796 (2001).https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00251-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Moffat, S.D., Resnick, S.M.: Effects of age on virtual environment place navigation and allocentric cognitive mapping. Behav. Neurosci.116, 851–859 (2002).https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7044.116.5.851

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H.: Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Presented at the (1976)

    Google Scholar 

42. Lee, S.A., Spelke, E.S.: Two systems of spatial representation underlying navigation. Exp. Brain Res.206, 179–188 (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2349-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Sturz, B.R., Forloines, M.R., Bodily, K.D.: Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation. Psychon. Bull. Rev.19, 270–276 (2012).https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0195-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Miller, N.: Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning. Behav. Proc.80, 306–313 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Anacta, V.J.A., Schwering, A., Li, R., Muenzer, S.: Orientation information in wayfinding instructions: evidences from human verbal and visual instructions. GeoJournal82(3), 567–583 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-016-9703-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. Goodman, J., Gray, P., Khammampad, K., Brewster, S.: Using landmarks to support older people in navigation. In: Brewster, S., Dunlop, M. (eds.) Mobile HCI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3160, pp. 38–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28637-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

47. Goodman-Deane, J., Brewster, S., Gray, P.: How can we best use landmarks to support older people in navigation? Behav. Inf. Technol. (2005).https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290512331319021

    Article  Google Scholar 

48. Stangl, M., Achtzehn, J., Huber, K., Dietrich, C., Tempelmann, C., Wolbers, T.: Compromised grid-cell-like representations in old age as a key mechanism to explain age-related navigational deficits. Curr. Biol.28, 1108-1115.e6 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

49. Lithfous, S., Dufour, A., Després, O.: Spatial navigation in normal aging and the prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s disease: insights from imaging and behavioral studies. Ageing Res. Rev.12, 201–213 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2012.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

50. Moffat, S.D., Elkins, W., Resnick, S.M.: Age differences in the neural systems supporting human allocentric spatial navigation. Neurobiol. Aging27, 965–972 (2006).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. Yassa, M.A., Mattfeld, A.T., Stark, S.M., Stark, C.E.L.: Age-related memory deficits linked to circuit-specific disruptions in the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 8873–8878 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101567108

    Article  Google Scholar 

52. Konishi, K., Etchamendy, N., Roy, S., Marighetto, A., Rajah, N., Bohbot, V.D.: Decreased functional magnetic resonance imaging activity in the hippocampus in favor of the caudate nucleus in older adults tested in a virtual navigation task. Hippocampus23, 1005–1014 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22181

    Article  Google Scholar 

53. Bécu, M., et al.: Age-related preference for geometric spatial cues during real-world navigation. Nat Hum Behav.4, 88–99 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0718-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

54. Kimura, K., Moussavi, Z.: Do older and young adults learn to integrate geometry while navigating in an environment of a serious game? J Exp Neurosci.16, 263310552098886 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1177/2633105520988861

    Article  Google Scholar 

55. Iaria, G., Palermo, L., Committeri, G., Barton, J.J.S.: Age differences in the formation and use of cognitive maps. Behav. Brain Res.196, 187–191 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.08.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

56. Picucci, L., Caffo, A.O., Bosco, A.: Age and sex differences in a virtual version of the reorientation task. Cogn. Process.10, 272–275 (2009).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0321-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

57. Schuck, N.W., Doeller, C.F., Polk, T.A., Lindenberger, U., Li, S.-C.: Human aging alters the neural computation and representation of space. Neuroimage117, 141–150 (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

58. Ishikawa, T., Fujiwara, H., Imai, O., Okabe, A.: Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: a comparison with maps and direct experience. J. Environ. Psychol.28, 74–82 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references