1. Berker, Y., et al.: MRI-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET/MRI systems: a 4-class tissue segmentation technique using a combined ultrashort-echo-time/Dixon MRI sequence. J. Nucl. Med.53(5), 796–804 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Burgos, N., Guerreiro, F., et al.: Iterative framework for the joint segmentation and CT synthesis of MR images: application to MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys. Med. Biol.62, 4237–4253 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Burgos, N., et al.: Robust CT synthesis for radiotherapy planning: application to the head and neck region. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9350, pp. 476–484. Springer, Cham (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_57

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

4. Burgos, N., et al.: Joint segmentation and CT synthesis for MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning. In: Ourselin, S., Joskowicz, L., Sabuncu, M.R., Unal, G., Wells, W. (eds.) MICCAI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9901, pp. 547–555. Springer, Cham (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_63

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

5. Burgos, N., et al.: Iterative framework for the joint segmentation and CT synthesis of MR images: application to MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys. Med. Biol.62(11), 4237 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S.S., Brox, T., Ronneberger, O.: 3D U-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: Ourselin, S., Joskowicz, L., Sabuncu, M.R., Unal, G., Wells, W. (eds.) MICCAI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9901, pp. 424–432. Springer, Cham (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

7. Degen, J., Heinrich, M.P.: Multi-atlas based pseudo-CT synthesis using multimodal image registration and local atlas fusion strategies. In: CVPR Workshops, pp. 160–168 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

8. Emami, H., Dong, M., Nejad-Davarani, S.P., Glide-Hurst, C.K.: Generating synthetic CTs from magnetic resonance images using generative adversarial networks. Med. Phys.45(8), 3627–3636 (2018)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Ge, Y., Wei, D., Xue, Z., Wang, Q., Zhou, X., Zhan, Y., Liao, S.: Unpaired MR to CT synthesis with explicit structural constrained adversarial learning. In: ISBI (2019)

   Google Scholar 

10. Guerreiro, F., et al.: Evaluation of a multi-atlas CT synthesis approach for MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning. Physica Med.35, 7–17 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Han, X.: MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network. Med. Phys.44(4), 1408–1419 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Hangartner, T.N.: Thresholding technique for accurate analysis of density and geometry in QCT, PQCT and muCT images. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact.7(1), 9 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

13. Isola, P., Zhu, J.Y., Zhou, T., Efros, A.A.: Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In: CVPR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

14. Jin, C.B., et al.: Deep CT to MR synthesis using paired and unpaired data. Sensors19(10), 2361 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Jolicoeur-Martineau, A.: The relativistic discriminator: a key element missing from standard GAN. In: ICLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

16. Kläser, K., et al.: Improved MR to CT synthesis for PET/MR attenuation correction using imitation learning. In: SSMI Workshop, pp. 13–21 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

17. Korhonen, J., Kapanen, M., et al.: A dual model HU conversion from MRI intensity values within and outside of bone segment for MRI-based radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer. Med Phys41, 011704 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Largent, A., et al.: Pseudo-CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy treatment planning: comparison among patch-based, atlas-based, and bulk density methods. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol.* Biol.* Phys.103(2), 479–490 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Largent, A., et al.: Comparison of deep learning-based and patch-based methods for pseudo-CT generation in MRI-based prostate dose planning. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol.* Biol.* Phys.105(5), 1137–1150 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Li, W., Wang, G., Fidon, L., Ourselin, S., Cardoso, M.J., Vercauteren, T.: On the compactness, efficiency, and representation of 3D convolutional networks: brain parcellation as a pretext task. In: Niethammer, M., et al. (eds.) IPMI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10265, pp. 348–360. Springer, Cham (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

21. Lin, Z., Zhong, M., Zeng, X., Ye, C.: Frequency-selective learning for CT to MR synthesis. In: Burgos, N., Svoboda, D., Wolterink, J.M., Zhao, C. (eds.) SASHIMI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12417, pp. 101–109. Springer, Cham (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59520-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

22. Liu, F., Jang, H., et al.: Deep learning MR imaging-based attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging. Radiology286(2), 676–684 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Mathieu, M., Couprie, C., LeCun, Y.: Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square error. In: ICLR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

24. Navalpakkam, B., Braun, H., et al.: Magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction for PET/MR hybrid imaging using continuous valued attenuation maps. Invest. Radiol.48, 323–332 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Nie, D., Cao, X., Gao, Y., Wang, L., Shen, D.: Estimating CT image from MRI data using 3D fully convolutional networks. In: Carneiro, G., et al. (eds.) LABELS/DLMIA -2016. LNCS, vol. 10008, pp. 170–178. Springer, Cham (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

26. Nie, D., et al.: Medical image synthesis with context-aware generative adversarial networks. In: Descoteaux, M., Maier-Hein, L., Franz, A., Jannin, P., Collins, D.L., Duchesne, S. (eds.) MICCAI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10435, pp. 417–425. Springer, Cham (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

27. Peng, C., Zhang, X., Yu, G., Luo, G., Sun, J.: Large kernel matters-improve semantic segmentation by global convolutional network. In: CVPR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

28. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

29. Roy, S., Butman, J.A., Pham, D.L.: Synthesizing CT from ultrashort echo-time MR images via convolutional neural networks. In: SSMI Workshop, pp. 24–32 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

30. Sjölund, J., Forsberg, D., Andersson, M., Knutsson, H.: Generating patient specific pseudo-CT of the head from MR using atlas-based regression. Phys. Med. Biol.60(2), 825 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Wolterink, J.M., Dinkla, A.M., Savenije, M.H., Seevinck, P.R., van den Berg, C.A., Išgum, I.: MR-to-CT synthesis using cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks. In: NIPS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references