1. Bailenson, J.N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Loomis, J.M.: Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull.29(7), 819–833 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Ballendat, T., Marquardt, N., Greenberg, S.: Proxemic interaction: designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment. In: ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 121–130 (2010)

   Google Scholar 

3. Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A.C., Swinth, K.R., Hoyt, C.L., Bailenson, J.N.: Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol. Inq.13(2), 103–124 (2002)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Boud, A.C., Haniff, D.J., Baber, C., Steiner, S.: Virtual reality and augmented reality as a training tool for assembly tasks. In: 1999 IEEE International Conference on Information Visualization (Cat. No. PR00210), pp. 32–36. IEEE (1999)

   Google Scholar 

5. Edward, T.: Hall, the hidden dimension (1966)

   Google Scholar 

6. Fox, J., Tang, W.Y.: Women’s experiences with general and sexual harassment in online video games: rumination, organizational responsiveness, withdrawal, and coping strategies. New Media Soc.19(8), 1290–1307 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Friedman, D., Steed, A., Slater, M.: Spatial social behavior in second life. In: International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp. 252–263. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74997-4_23

8. Gonzalez-Liencres, C., Zapata, L.E., Iruretagoyena, G., Seinfeld, S., Perez-Mendez, L., Arroyo-Palacios, J., Borland, D., Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M.V.: Being the victim of intimate partner violence in virtual reality: first-versus third-person perspective. Front. Psychol.11, 820 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Grønbæk, J.E., Knudsen, M.S., O’Hara, K., Krogh, P.G., Vermeulen, J., Petersen, M.G.: Proxemics beyond proximity: designing for flexible social interaction through cross-device interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1–14. CHI 2020, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020).https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376379

10. Hall, E.T., Birdwhistell, R.L., Bock, B., Bohannan, P., Diebold, A.R., Jr., Durbin, M., Edmonson, M.S., Fischer, J., Hymes, D., Kimball, S.T., et al.: Proxemics [and comments and replies]. Curr. Anthropol.9(2/3), 83–108 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Hayduk, L.A.: Personal space: where we now stand. Psychol. Bull.94(2), 293 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Hecht, H., Welsch, R., Viehoff, J., Longo, M.R.: The shape of personal space. Acta Physiol. (Oxf)193, 113–122 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

13. Hussain, Z., Griffiths, M.D.: Gender swapping and socializing in cyberspace: an exploratory study. CyberPsychol. Behav.11(1), 47–53 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Ruggiero, G.: Body space in social interactions: a comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality. PloS one9(11), e111511 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V.P., Galante, F., Ruggiero, G.: Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: effects of gender and age. J. Environ. Psychol.45, 154–164 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Kuznekoff, J.H., Rose, L.M.: Communication in multiplayer gaming: examining player responses to gender cues. New Media Soc.15(4), 541–556 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Llobera, J., Spanlang, B., Ruffini, G., Slater, M.: Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. (TAP)8(1), 1–12 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Mäkelä, V., Heimonen, T., Luhtala, M., Turunen, M.: Information wall: evaluation of a gesture-controlled public display. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, p. 228–231. MUM 2014, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2014).https://doi.org/10.1145/2677972.2677998

19. Mäkelä, V., et al.: Virtual field studies: conducting studies on public displays in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1–15. CHI 2020, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020).https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376796

20. Marquardt, N., Diaz-Marino, R., Boring, S., Greenberg, S.: The proximity toolkit: prototyping proxemic interactions in ubiquitous computing ecologies. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, p. 315–326. UIST 2011, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011).https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047238

21. Martens, A.L., Grover, C.A., Saucier, D.A., Morrison, B.A.: An examination of gender differences versus similarities in a virtual world. Comput. Hum. Behav.84, 404–409 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. McDaniel, T.L., Villanueva, D., Krishna, S., Colbry, D., Panchanathan, S.: Heartbeats: A methodology to convey interpersonal distance through touch. In: CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 3985–3990. CHI EA 2010, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2010).https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754090

23. McLaughlin, C., Olson, R., White, M.J.: Environmental issues in patient care management: proxemics, personal space, and territoriality. Rehabil. Nurs.33(4), 143–147 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2008.tb00219.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Mitchell, W.J., Szerszen Sr, K.A., Lu, A.S., Schermerhorn, P.W., Scheutz, M., MacDorman, K.F.: A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley. i-Perception2(1), 10–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

25. Mueller, F., et al.: Proxemics play: understanding proxemics for designing digital play experiences. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, p. 533–542. DIS 2014, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2014).https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598532

26. Mäkelä, V., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M.: Semi-automated, large-scale evaluation of public displays. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact.34(6), 491–505 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1367905

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Neyret, S., Navarro, X., Beacco, A., Oliva, R., Bourdin, P., Valenzuela, J., Barberia, I., Slater, M.: An embodied perspective as a victim of sexual harassment in virtual reality reduces action conformity in a later milgram obedience scenario. Sci. Rep.10(1), 1–18 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Obata, A., Sasaki, K.: OfficeWalker: a virtual visiting system based on proxemics. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1–10 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

29. Peña, J., Yoo, S.C.: Under pressure: Avatar appearance and cognitive load effects on attitudes, trustworthiness, bidding, and interpersonal distance in a virtual store. Presence23(1), 18–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Rivu, R., et al.: Remote VR studies - a framework for running virtual reality studies remotely via participant-owned HMDs. CoRR abs/2102.11207 (2021).https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11207

31. Ruggiero, G., Frassinetti, F., Coello, Y., Rapuano, M., di Cola, A.S., Iachini, T.: The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces. Psychol. Res.81(6), 1232–1240 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Schmieder, C.: World of maskcraft vs. world of queercraft? communication, sex and gender in the online role-playing game world of warcraft. J. Gaming Virtual Worlds1(1), 5–21 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Uzzell, D., Horne, N.: The influence of biological sex, sexuality and gender role on interpersonal distance. Br. J. Soc. Psychol.45(3), 579–597 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Vella, K., Klarkowski, M., Turkay, S., Johnson, D.: Making friends in online games: gender differences and designing for greater social connectedness. Behav. Inf. Technol.39(8), 917–934 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Wang, S.T., Kuo, W.C., Yang, J.C.: An empirical study on gender switching of MMORPG players. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2011). Chiang Mai, Thailand (2011)

    Google Scholar 

36. Welsch, R., von Castell, C., Hecht, H.: Interpersonal distance regulation and approach-avoidance reactions are altered in psychopathy. Clin. Psychol. Sci.8(2), 211–225 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619869336

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Welsch, R., von Castell, C., Rettenberger, M., Turner, D., Hecht, H., Fromberger, P.: Sexual attraction modulates interpersonal distance and approach-avoidance movements towards virtual agents in males. PloS one15(4), e0231539 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Welsch, R., Hecht, H., von Castell, C.: Psychopathy and the regulation of interpersonal distance. Clin. Psychol. Sci.6(6), 835–847 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Williams, J.L.: Personal space and its relation to extraversion-introversion. Can. J. Behav. Sci.3(2), 156 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Yee, N., Bailenson, J.N., Urbanek, M., Chang, F., Merget, D.: The unbearable likeness of being digital: the persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. CyberPsychol. Behav.10(1), 115–121 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Yee, N., Ducheneaut, N., Yao, M., Nelson, L.: Do men heal more when in drag? conflicting identity cues between user and avatar. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 773–776 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

42. Zibrek, K., Niay, B., Olivier, A.H., Hoyet, L., Pettre, J., McDonnell, R.: The effect of gender and attractiveness of motion on proximity in virtual reality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept.17(4) (2020).https://doi.org/10.1145/3419985

Download references