1. Aas, K., Jullum, M., Løland, A.: Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to shapley values. arXiv preprintarXiv:1903.10464 (2019)

2. Adebayo, J., Gilmer, J., Goodfellow, I., Kim, B.: Local explanation methods for deep neural networks lack sensitivity to parameter values. arXiv preprintarXiv:1810.03307 (2018)

3. Alvarez-Melis, D., Jaakkola, T.S.: On the robustness of interpretability methods. arXiv preprintarXiv:1806.08049 (2018)

4. Amiri, S.S., et al.: Data representing ground-truth explanations to evaluate XAI methods. arXiv preprintarXiv:2011.09892 (2020)

5. Barbado, A., Corcho, O.: Explanation generation for anomaly detection models applied to the fuel consumption of a vehicle fleet (2020)

   Google Scholar 

6. Chen, H., Janizek, J.D., Lundberg, S., Lee, S.I.: True to the model or true to the data? arXiv preprintarXiv:2006.16234 (2020)

7. Du, M., Liu, N., Hu, X.: Techniques for interpretable machine learning. Commun. ACM63(1), 68–77 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1145/3359786

8. Främling, K.: Explaining results of neural networks by contextual importance and utility. In: Proceedings of the AISB 1996 Conference, Brighton, UK, 1–2 April 1996

   Google Scholar 

9. Främling, K.: Modélisation et apprentissage des préférences par réseaux de neurones pour l’aide à la décision multicritère. Ph.D. thesis, INSA de Lyon, March 1996

   Google Scholar 

10. Främling, K.: Decision theory meets explainable AI. In: Calvaresi, D., Najjar, A., Winikoff, M., Främling, K. (eds.) EXTRAAMAS 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12175, pp. 57–74. Springer, Cham (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51924-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

11. Främling, K.: Explainable AI without interpretable model. arXiv preprintarXiv:2009.13996 (2020).https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.13996

12. Främling, K., Graillot, D.: Extracting explanations from neural networks. In: ICANN 1995 Conference, Paris, France, October 1995

    Google Scholar 

13. Främling, K.: Contextual importance and utility in R: the ‘CIU’ package. In: Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Explainable Agency in Artificial Intelligence, at 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 110–114 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

14. Gruber, S., Kopper, P.: Introduction to local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME).https://compstat-lmu.github.io/iml_methods_limitations/lime.html (2020)

15. Laugel, T., Renard, X., Lesot, M.J., Marsala, C., Detyniecki, M.: Defining locality for surrogates in post-hoc interpretablity. arXiv preprintarXiv:1806.07498 (2018)

16. Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 4765–4774. Curran Associates, Inc. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

17. Molnar, C.: Interpretable Machine Learning.https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/ (2019)

18. Molnar, C., Bischl, B., Casalicchio, G.: iml: an R package for interpretable machine learning. JOSS3(26), 786 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

19. Papenmeier, A., Englebienne, G., Seifert, C.: How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trust. CoRR abs/1907.12652 (2019).http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.12652

20. Pedersen, T.L., Benesty, M.: LIME: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (2019).https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lime. r package version 0.5.1

21. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: “why should i trust you?” explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1135–1144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

22. Shapley, L.S.: A value for n-person games. In: Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. 2, no. 28, pp. 307–317 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

23. Shortliffe, E.H., Davis, R., Axline, S.G., Buchanan, B.G., Green, C., Cohen, S.N.: Computer-based consultations in clinical therapeutics: explanation and rule acquisition capabilities of the MYCIN system. Comput. Biomed. Res.8(4), 303–320 (1975).https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4809(75)90009-9

24. Swartout, W.R., Moore, J.D.: Explanation in second generation expert systems. In: David, J.M., Krivine, J.P., Simmons, R. (eds.) Second Generation Expert Systems, pp. 543–585. Springer, Heidelberg (1993).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77927-5_24

25. Wallenius, J., Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R.E., Zionts, S., Deb, K.: Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manage. Sci.54(7), 1336–1349 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Yang, F., Du, M., Hu, X.: Evaluating explanation without ground truth in interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprintarXiv:1907.06831 (2019)

Download references