1. Baader, F., et al.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

   Google Scholar 

2. Ben-Asher, N., Oltramari, A., Erbacher, R.F., Gonzalez, C.: Ontology-based adaptive systems of cyber defense. In: STIDS. pp. 34–41 (2015)

   Google Scholar 

3. Bergner, S., Lechner, U.: Cybersecurity ontology for critical infrastructures. In: KEOD. pp. 80–85 (2017)

   Google Scholar 

4. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data:the story so far. In: Semantic Services, Interoperability and Web Applications: Emerging Concepts. pp. 205–227. IGI Global (2011)

   Google Scholar 

5. Blanco, C., Lasheras, J., Valencia-García, R., Fernández-Medina, E., Toval, A., Piattini, M.: A systematic review and comparison of security ontologies. In: 3th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. pp. 813–820. IEEE (2008)

   Google Scholar 

6. Booth, H., Turner, C.: Vulnerability description ontology (vdo). A Framework for Characterizing Vulnerabilities, NIST (2016)

   Google Scholar 

7. Borgo, S., Masolo, C.: Ontological foundations of dolce. In: Poli, R., Healy, M., Kameas, A., (eds.) Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2010)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8847-5_13

8. Degen, W., Heller, B., Herre, H., Smith, B.: Gol: toward an axiomatized upper-level ontology. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems-Volume. pp. 34–46 (2001)

   Google Scholar 

9. Dietz, M., Putz, B., Pernul, G.: A distributed ledger approach to digital twin secure data sharing. In: IFIP Annual Conference on Data and Applications Security and Privacy. pp. 281–300. Springer (2019)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22479-0_15

10. Elnagdy, S.A., Qiu, M., Gai, K.: Cyber incident classifications using ontology-based knowledge representation for cybersecurity insurance in financial industry. In: 2016 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud). pp. 301–306. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

11. Falbo, R.D.A.: SABiO: Systematic Approach for Building Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop ONTO.COM/ODISE on Ontologies in Conceptual Modeling and Information Systems Engineering (2014)

    Google Scholar 

12. Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of the Ontological Engineering AAAI-97 Spring Symposium Series. American Association for Artificial Intelligence (1997)

    Google Scholar 

13. Finkel, J.R., Grenager, T., Manning, C.: Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL 2005, p. 363–370. USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

14. Giaretta, P., Guarino, N.: Ontologies and knowledge bases towards a terminological clarification. Towards very large knowledge bases: knowledge building & knowledge sharing25, 32 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

15. Grégio, A., Bonacin, R., Nabuco, O., Afonso, V.M., De Geus, P.L., Jino, M.: Ontology for malware behavior: a core model proposal. In: 2014 IEEE 23rd International WETICE Conference. pp. 453–458. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

16. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology in information systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference. pp. 6–8. IOS Press, Trento, Italy (1998)

    Google Scholar 

17. Guarino, N.: The ontological level. Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences (1994)

    Google Scholar 

18. Guizzardi, G.: The role of foundational ontology for conceptual modeling and domain ontology representation, keynote paper. In: 7th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems (DB&IS), Vilnius, IEEE Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

19. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (2005)

    Google Scholar 

20. Guizzardi, G.: On ontology, ontologies, conceptualizations, modeling languages, and (meta) models. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl.155, 18 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

21. Guizzardi, G., Ferreira Pires, L., van Sinderen, M.: An ontology-based approach for evaluating thedomain appropriateness andcomprehensibility appropriateness of modeling languages. In: Briand, L., Williams, C. (eds.) MODELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 691–705. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).https://doi.org/10.1007/11557432_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

22. Hadar, E., Hassanzadeh, A.: Big data analytics on cyber attack graphs for prioritizing agile security requirements. In: 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE). pp. 330–339. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

23. Herre, H.: General formal ontology (gfo): a foundational ontology for conceptual modelling. In: Poli, R., Healy, M., Kameas, A. (eds) Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (2010)https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8847-5_14

24. Horrocks, I., et al.: Daml+oil: a description logic for the semantic web. IEEE Data Eng. Bull.25(1), 4–9 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

25. Iannacone, M., et al.: Developing an ontology for cyber security knowledge graphs. In: 10th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

26. Jia, Y., Qi, Y., Shang, H., Jiang, R., Li, A.: A practical approach to constructing a knowledge graph for cybersecurity. Engineering4(1), 53–60 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Kang, D., Lee, J., Choi, S., Kim, K.: An ontology-based enterprise architecture. Expert Syst. Appl.37(2), 1456–1464 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Keil, J.M., Schindler, S.: Comparison and evaluation of ontologies for units of measurement. Semantic Web10(1), 33–51 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Mascardi, V., Cordì, V., Rosso, P.: A comparison of upper ontologies. In: Woa. vol. 2007, pp. 55–64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

30. Mozzaquatro, B.A., Agostinho, C., Goncalves, D., Martins, J., Jardim-Goncalves, R.: An ontology-based cybersecurity framework for the internet of things. Sensors18(9), 3053 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Mundie, D.A., Ruefle, R., Dorofee, A.J., Perl, S.J., McCloud, J., Collins, M.: An incident management ontology. In: STIDS. pp. 62–71 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

32. Narayanan, S., Ganesan, A., Joshi, K., Oates, T., Joshi, A., Finin, T.: Cognitive techniques for early detection of cybersecurity events. arXiv preprintarXiv:1808.00116 (2018)

33. Obrst, L., Chase, P., Markeloff, R.: Developing an ontology of the cyber security domain. In: STIDS. pp. 49–56 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

34. Oltramari, A., Cranor, L.F., Walls, R.J., McDaniel, P.: Computational ontology of network operations. In: MILCOM 2015–2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference. pp. 318–323. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

35. Oltramari, A., Cranor, L.F., Walls, R.J., McDaniel, P.D.: Building an ontology of cyber security. In: STIDS. pp. 54–61. Citeseer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

36. Oltramari, A., Henshel, D.S., Cains, M., Hoffman, B.: Towards a human factors ontology for cyber security. In: STIDS. pp. 26–33 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

37. Oltramari, A., Vetere, G., Lenzerini, M., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N.: Senso comune. In: LREC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

38. Onwubiko, C.: Cocoa: An ontology for cybersecurity operations centre analysis process. In: 2018 International Conference On Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Analytics And Assessment (Cyber SA). pp. 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

39. Ou, X., Govindavajhala, S., Appel, A.W.: Mulval: A logic-based network security analyzer. In: USENIX security symposium. vol. 8, pp. 113–128. Baltimore (2005)

    Google Scholar 

40. Parmelee, M.C.: Toward an ontology architecture for cyber-security standards. STIDS713, 116–123 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

41. Pipa, A.M.C.: OWL ontology quality assessment and optimization in the cybersecurity domain. Ph.D. thesis, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (2018)

    Google Scholar 

42. Rose, S., Engel, D., Cramer, N., Cowley, W.: Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. In: Berry, M.W., Kogan, J. (eds.) Text Mining. Applications and Theory, pp. 1–20. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd (2010)

    Google Scholar 

43. Rutkowski, A., et al.: Cybex: The cybersecurity information exchange framework (x.1500). SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev.40(5), 59–64 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Sikos, L.F.: OWL ontologies in cybersecurity: conceptual modeling of cyber-knowledge. In: Sikos, L.F. (ed.) AI in Cybersecurity. ISRL, vol. 151, pp. 1–17. Springer, Cham (2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98842-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

45. Singhal, A., Ou, X.: Security risk analysis of enterprise networks using probabilistic attack graphs. Network Security Metrics, pp. 53–73. Springer, Cham (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66505-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

46. Syed, R., Zhong, H.: Cybersecurity vulnerability management: An ontology-based conceptual model (2018)

    Google Scholar 

47. Syed, Z., Padia, A., Finin, T., Mathews, L., Joshi, A.: UCO: A unified cybersecurity ontology. In: Workshops at the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016)

    Google Scholar 

48. Takahashi, T., Kadobayashi, Y.: Reference ontology for cybersecurity operational information. Comput. J.58(10), 2297–2312 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

49. Takahashi, T., Fujiwara, H., Kadobayashi, Y.: Building ontology of cybersecurity operational information. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop on Cyber Security and Information intelligence Research. pp. 1–4 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

50. Takahashi, T., Kadobayashi, Y.: Cybersecurity information exchange techniques: Cybersecurity information ontology and cybex. J. National Instit. Inf. Commun. Technol.58(3/4), 127–135 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

51. Takahashi, T., Kadobayashi, Y., Fujiwara, H.: Ontological approach toward cybersecurity in cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Security of Information and Networks. pp. 100–109 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

52. Undercofer, J., Joshi, A., Finin, T., Pinkston, J., et al.: A target-centric ontology for intrusion detection. In: Workshop on Ontologies in Distributed Systems, held at The 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2003)

    Google Scholar 

53. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the deep structure of information systems. Inf. Syst. J.5(3), 203–223 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

54. Wang, J.Z., Ali, F.: An efficient ontology comparison tool for semantic web applications. In: The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2005). pp. 372–378. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

55. Wang, J.A., Guo, M.: Ovm: an ontology for vulnerability management. In: 5th Annual Workshop on Cyber Security and Information Intelligence Research: Cyber Security and Information Intelligence Challenges and Strategies. pp. 1–4 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

56. Wieringa, R.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

57. Zuanelli, E.: The cybersecurity ontology platform: the poc solution. e-AGE2017 p. 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references