1. Wilkowska, W., Offermann-Van Heek, J., Brauner, P., Ziefle, M.: Wind of change? Attitudes towards aging and use of medical technology. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, pp. 80–91. SciTePress, Crete (2019).https://doi.org/10.5220/0007693000800091

2. Pickard, L.: A growing care gap? The supply of unpaid care for older people by their adult children in England to 2032. Ageing Soc.35(1), 96–123 (2015)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Deusdad, B.A., Pace, C., Anttonen, A.: Facing the challenges in the development of long-term care for older people in Europe in the context of an economic crisis. J. Soc. Serv. Res.42(2), 144–150 (2016)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Haustein, T., Mischke, J., Schönfeld, F., Willand, I.: Older people in Germany and the EU. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden (2016)

   Google Scholar 

5. Rashidi, P., Mihailidis, A.: A survey on ambientassisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.17(3), 579–590 (2013)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Delello, J.A., McWhorter, R.R.: Reducing the digital divide: connecting older adults to iPad technology. J. Appl. Gerontol.36(1), 3–28 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Senior residents perceived need of and preferences for smart home sensor technologies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care24(1), 120–124 (2008)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York (2010)

   Google Scholar 

9. Baltes, P.B.: Theoretical propositions of lifespan developmental psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline. Dev. Psychol.23(5), 611–626 (1987)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Poulin, M.J., Haase, C.M.: Growing to trust: evidence that trust increases and sustains well-being across the life span. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci.6(6), 614–621 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Smith, A.: Older adults and technology use. Pew Research Center (2014).http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adultsand-technology-use/. Accessed 18 Dec 2018

12. Gövercin, M., Meyer, S., Schellenbach, M., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Weiss, B., Haesner, M.: SmartSenior@ home: acceptance of an integrated ambient assisted living system. Results of a clinical field trial in 35 households. Inform. Health Soc. Care41(4), 430–447 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Peek, S.T., Wouters, E.J., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K.G., Boeije, H.R., Vrijhoef, H.J.: Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform.83(4), 235–248 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Wilkowska, W.: Acceptance of ehealth technology in home environments: advanced studies on user diversity in ambient assisted living. Apprimus Verlag (2015)

    Google Scholar 

15. Beringer, R., Sixsmith, A., Campo, M., Brown, J., McCloskey, R.: The “acceptance” of ambient assisted living: developing an alternate methodology to this limited research lens. In: Abdulrazak, B., Giroux, S., Bouchard, B., Pigot, H., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6719, pp. 161–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21535-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Offermann-van Heek, J., Schomakers, E.-M., Ziefle, M.: Bare necessities? How the need for care modulates the acceptance of ambient assisted living technologies. Int. J. Med. Inform.127, 147–156 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. van Heek, J., Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: The surveillance society: which factors form public acceptance of surveillance technologies? In: Helfert, M., Klein, C., Donnellan, B., Gusikhin, O. (eds.) SMARTGREENS/VEHITS -2016. CCIS, vol. 738, pp. 170–191. Springer, Cham (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63712-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

18. Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Smart home medical technologies: users requirements for conditional acceptance. i-com15(1), 39–50 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Thompson, A.E., Anisimowicz, Y., Miedema, B., Hogg, W., Wodchis, W.P., Aubrey-Bassler, K.: The influence of gender and other patient characteristics on health care-seeking behaviour: a QUALICOPC study. BMC Fam. Pract.17(1) (2016). Article number: 38.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0440-0

20. Arber, S., Vandrevala, T., Daly, T., Hampson, S.: Understanding gender differences in older people’s attitudes towards life-prolonging medical technologies. J. Aging Stud.22(4), 366–375 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: User diversity as a challenge for the integration of medical technology into future smart home environments. In: Human-Centered Design of E-Health Technologies: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, pp. 95–126. IGI Global (2011).https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-177-5.ch005

22. Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: A small but significant difference – the role of gender on acceptance of medical assistive technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

23. Klack, L., Schmitz-Rode, T., Wilkowska, W., Kasugai, K., Heidrich, F., Ziefle, M.: Integrated home monitoring and compliance optimization for patients with mechanical circulatory support devices. Ann. Biomed. Eng.39(12), 2911–2921 (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0407-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. van Heek, J., Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Helpful but spooky? Acceptance of AAL-systems contrasting user groups with focus on disabilities and care needs. In: 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, pp. 78–90. SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications (2017).https://doi.org/10.5220/0006325400780090

25. van Heek, J., Ziefle, M., Himmel, S.: Caregivers’ perspectives on ambient assisted living technologies in professional care contexts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT for Aging well, pp. 37–48. SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications (2018).https://doi.org/10.5220/0006691400370048

26. Lopez-Otin, C., Blasco, M.A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M., Kroemer, G.: The hallmarks of aging. Cell153(6), 1194–1217 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Jaul, E., Barron, J.: Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population. Front. Public Health5(12), 1–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

28. Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A., Kotter-Grhn, D., Smith, J.: Self-perceptions of aging: do subjective age and satisfaction with aging change during old age? J. Gerontol. Ser. B63(6), 377–385 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Kotter-Grühn, D., Hess, T.M.: The impact of age stereotypes on self-perceptions of aging across the adult lifespan. J. Gerontol. Ser. B61(3), 72–77 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

30. Schreder, G., Smuc, M., Siebenhandl, K., Mayr, E.: Age and computer self-efficacy in the use of digital technologies: an investigation of prototypes for public self-service terminals. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8010, pp. 221–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39191-0_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

31. Heinz, M., et al.: Perceptions of technology among older adults. J. Gerontol. Nurs.39(1), 42–51 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. De Schutter, B., Vanden Abeele, V.: Designing meaningful play within the psycho-social context of older adults. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games, pp. 84–93. Fun and Games, Leuven (2010).https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823827

33. Knowles, B., Hanson, V.L.: The wisdom of older technology (non)users. Commun. ACM61(3), 72–77 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Schomakers, E.-M., Offermann-van Heek, J., Ziefle, M.: Attitudes towards aging and the acceptance of ICT for aging in place. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2018. LNCS, vol. 10926, pp. 149–169. Springer, Cham (2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

35. Ryan, R.M., Frederick, C.: On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. J. Pers.65(3), 529–565 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Beier, G.: Kontrollüberzeugungen im Umgang mit Technik [Locus of control when interacting with technology]. Rep. Psychol.24(9), 684–693 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

37. Brown, T.H., Richardson, L.J., Hargrove, T.W., Thomas, C.S.: Using multiple-hierarchy stratification and life course approaches to understand health inequalities: the intersecting consequences of race, gender, SES, and age. J. Health Soc. Behav.57(2), 200–222 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146516645165

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

39. Uhlenberg, P.: International Handbook of Population Aging, 1st edn. Springer, Dordrecht (2009).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8356-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

40. Bloom, D.E., Boersch-Supan, A., McGee, P., Seike, A., et al.: Population aging: facts, challenges, and responses. Benefits Compens. Int.41(1), 22 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

41. Bosworth, B.P., Burtless, G.: Aging Societies: The Global Dimension. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

42. Kotter-Grühn, D., Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A., Gerstorf, D., Smith, J.: Self-perceptions of aging predict mortality and change with approaching death: 16-year longitudinal results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychol. Aging24(3), 654–667 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Wurm, S., Warner, L.M., Ziegelmann, J.P., Wolff, J.K., Schüz, B.: How do negative self-perceptions of aging become a self-fulfilling prophecy? Psychol. Aging28(4), 1088–1097 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Boot, W., Charness, N., Czaja, S., Rogers, W., Sharit, J.: Aging and leisure activities: opportunities and design challenges. Innov. Aging2(1), 213 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Lee, C.C., et al.: Attitudes toward computers across adulthood from 1994 to 2013. Gerontologist59(1), 22–33 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. Mitzner, T.L., et al.: Technology adoption by older adults: findings from the prism trial. Gerontologist59(1), 34–44 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

47. Chen, K., Chan, A.H.S.: Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics57(5), 635–652 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references