1. Afzal, W., et al.: The MegaM@Rt2 ECSEL project: MegaModelling at runtime – scalable model-based framework for continuous development and runtime validation of complex systems. Microprocess. Microsyst.61, 86–95 (2018)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Sadovykh, A., et al.: Model-based system engineering in practice: document generation-MegaM@Rt2 project experience. In: Proceedings of the 14th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference, pp. 9:1–9:6 (2018)

   Google Scholar 

3. MegaMart2 - MegaModelling at runtime: MegaMart2 - MegaModelling at runtime.https://megamart2-ecsel.eu/. Accessed 25 June 2019

4. ECSEL’s multi-annual strategic plan 2016.http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/legal/jtis/ecsel-multi-stratplan-2016_en.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2019

5. Sadovykh, A., et al.: A tool-supported approach for building the architecture and roadmap in MegaM@Rt2 project. In: Ciancarini, P., Mazzara, M., Messina, A., Sillitti, A., Succi, G. (eds.) SEDA 2018. AISC, vol. 925, pp. 265–274. Springer, Cham (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14687-0_24

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

6. Pérez, B., Porres, I.: Reasoning about UML/OCL class diagrams using constraint logic programming and formula. Inf. Syst.81, 152–177 (2019)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Villar, E.: Model-driven analysis and design of IoT systems. In: 1st International Workshop on Embedded Software for Industrial IoT, Dresden, Germany (2018)

   Google Scholar 

8. Cariou, E., Le Goaer, O., Brunschwig, L., Barbier, F.: A generic solution for weaving business code into executable models. In MODELS 2018 ACM/IEEE 21th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark (2018)

   Google Scholar 

9. Muttillo, V., Valente, G., Pomante, L.: Design space exploration for mixed-criticality embedded systems considering hypervisor-based SW partitions. In: 2018 21st Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD) (2018)

   Google Scholar 

10. Ciambrone, D., Muttillo, V., Pomante, L., Valente, G.: HEPSIM: an ESL HW/SW co-simulator/analysis tool for heterogeneous parallel embedded systems. In: 2018 7th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

11. Wiik, J., Ersfolk, J., Walden, M.: A contract-based approach to scheduling and verification of dynamic dataflow networks. In: 2018 16th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for System Design (MEMOCODE) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

12. Vain, J., Truscan, D., Iqbal, J., Tsiopoulos, L.: On the benefits of using aspect-orientation in UPPAAL timed automata. In: 2017 International Conference on Infocom Technologies and Unmanned Systems (Trends and Future Directions) (ICTUS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

13. Medina, J.L., Villar, E.: Towards MARTE ++: an enhanced UML-based language to Model and Analyse Real-Time and Embedded Systems for the IoT age. Presented at the Forum on specification & Design Languages (FDL 2017), Verona, Italy (2017)

    Google Scholar 

14. Arcelli, D., Cortellessa, V., Di Pompeo, D.: Automating performance antipattern detection and software refactoring in UML models. In: 2019 IEEE 26th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

15. Arcelli, D., Cortellessa, V., Di Pompeo, D., Eramo, R., Tucci, M.: Exploiting architecture/runtime model-driven traceability for performance improvement. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

16. Nybom, K., Ashraf, A., Porres, I.: A systematic mapping study on API documentation generation approaches. In: 2018 44th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

17. Marinescu, R., Filipovikj, P., Enoiu, E.P., Larsson, J., Seceleanu, C.: An energy-aware mutation testing framework for EAST-ADL architectural models. In: 29th Nordic Workshop on Programming Theory, Turku, Finland (2018)

    Google Scholar 

18. Marinescu, R., Enoiu, E., Seceleanu, C., Sundmark, D.: Automatic test generation for energy consumption of embedded systems modeled in EAST-ADL. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

19. Siavashi, F., Truscan, D., Vain, J.: Vulnerability assessment of web services with model-based mutation testing. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

20. Iqbal, J., Truscan, D., Vain, J., Porres, I.: Reconstructing timed symbolic traces from rtioco-based timed test sequences using backward-induction. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems – ECBS 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

21. Stratis, A., Causevic, A.: A practical approach towards validating HIL simulation of a safety-critical system. In: 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

22. Bergstrom, H., Enoiu, E.P.: Using timed base-choice coverage criterion for testing industrial control software. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

23. Enoiu, E., Sundmark, D., Causevic, A., Pettersson, P.: A comparative study of manual and automated testing for industrial control software. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

24. Ahmad, T., Truscan, D., Porres, I.: Identifying worst-case user scenarios for performance testing of web applications using Markov-chain workload models. Future Gener. Comput. Syst.87, 910–920 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Diaz, A., Pena, D., Villar, E.: Short and long distance marker detection technique in outdoor and indoor environments for embedded systems. In: 2017 32nd Conference on Design of Circuits and Integrated Systems (DCIS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

26. Gronback, R.: Eclipse modeling project | the eclipse foundation.https://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/. Accessed 25 June 2019

27. Modelio open source - UML and BPMN modeling tool.https://www.modelio.org/. Accessed 25 June 2019

28. Daniel, G., et al.: NeoEMF: a multi-database model persistence framework for very large models. Sci. Comput. Programm.149, 9–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Bruneliere, H., Perez, J.G., Wimmer, M., Cabot, J.: EMF views: a view mechanism for integrating heterogeneous models. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M.L., Liddle, S.W., Opdahl, A.L., López, Ó.P. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 317–325. Springer, Cham (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

30. Cicchetti, A., Di Ruscio, D., Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A.: JTL: a bidirectional and change propagating transformation language. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 183–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19440-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

31. Desfray, P.: Model repositories at the enterprises and systems scale: the Modelio Constellation solution. In: 2015 International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

32. Eramo, R., Pierantonio, A., Tucci, M.: Enhancing the JTL tool for bidirectional transformations. In: Conference Companion of the 2nd International Conference on Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming – Programming 2018 Companion (2018)

    Google Scholar 

33. Cortellessa, V., Eramo, R., Tucci, M.: Availability-driven architectural change propagation through bidirectional model transformations between UML and petri net models. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

34. Bruneliere, H., Burger, E., Cabot, J., Wimmer, M.: A feature-based survey of model view approaches. Softw. Syst. Model.18(3), 1931–1952 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Bruneliere, H., Marchand, F., Daniel, G., Cabot, J.: Towards scalable model views on heterogeneous model resources. In: ACM/IEEE 21th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2018), Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 334–344 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

36. Eramo, R., et al.: Model-driven design-runtime interaction in safety critical system development: an experience report. In: 15th European Conference on Modelling Foundations and Applications (ECMFA), Co-located with STAF 2019, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Bruneliere, H., et al.: Model-driven engineering for design-runtime interaction in complex systems: scientific challenges and roadmap. In: Mazzara, M., Ober, I., Salaün, G. (eds.) STAF 2018. LNCS, vol. 11176, pp. 536–543. Springer, Cham (2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04771-9_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

38. Deliverables - MegaMart2 - MegaModelling at Runtime.https://megamart2-ecsel.eu/deliverables/. Accessed 25 June 2019

39. MegaM@Rt2 tool box.http://toolbox.megamart2-ecsel.eu/. Accessed 25 June 2019

Download references