1. Statista: Revenues from the artificial intelligence (AI) market worldwide from 2016 to 2025 (in million U.S. dollars) (2019).https://www.statista.com/statistics/607716/worldwide-artificial-intelligence-market-revenues/

2. Klein, G., Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M., Woods, D.D.: Common ground and coordination in joint activity. Organ. Simul.53, 139–184 (2005)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Klien, G., Woods, D.D., Bradshaw, J.M., Hoffman, R.R., Feltovich, P.J.: Ten challenges for making automation a “team player” in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intell. Syst.19(6), 91–95 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Cunningham, M., Regan, M.A.: Autonomous vehicles: human factors issues and future research. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Australasian Road Safety Conference, Australasian College of Road Safety, Gold Coast, Australia, October 2015

   Google Scholar 

5. Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors46(1), 50–80 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Park, J.H., McKilligan, S.: A systematic literature review for human-computer interaction and design thinking process integration. In: Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice, pp. 725–740. Springer, New York (2018)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

7. Stevens, B.L., Lewis, F.L.: Aircraft Control and Simulation. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)

   Google Scholar 

8. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors37(2), 381–394 (1995)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Audi: Audi AI traffic jam pilot (2018).https://www.audi-technology-portal.de/en/electrics-electronics/driver-assistant-systems/audi-a8-audi-ai-traffic-jam-pilot. Accessed 19 Jan 2019

10. SAE On-road Automated Vehicles Standards Committee: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems (2016).http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201401/. Accessed 19 Jan 2019

11. De Winter, J.C., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A.: Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.27, 196–217 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. McCall, R., McGee, F., Meschtscherjakov, A., Louveton, N., Engel, T.: Towards a taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 193–200. ACM, October 2016

    Google Scholar 

13. Clark, J.R., Stanton, N.A., Revell, K.M.A.: Conditionally and highly automated vehicle handover: a study exploring vocal communication between two drivers. Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. (2018, in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.008

14. Eriksson, A., Stanton, N.A.: Driving performance after self-regulated control transitions in highly automated vehicles. Hum. Factors59(8), 1233–1248 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Stanton, N.A., Stewart, R., Harris, D., Houghton, R.J., Baber, C., McMaster, R., Linsell, M.: Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics49(12–13), 1288–1311 (2006).https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600612762

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Sorensen, L.J., Stanton, N.A.: Keeping it together: the role of transactional situation awareness in team performance. Int. J. Ind. Ergon.53, 267–273 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Cohen, M.D., Hilligoss, B., Amaral, A.C.K.-B.: A handoff is not a telegram: an understanding of the patient is co-constructed. Crit. Care16(1), 303 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10536

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Patterson, E.S., Roth, E.M., Woods, D.D., Chow, R., Gomes, J.O.: Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations. Int. J. Qual. Health Care16(2), 125–132 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzh026

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Walch, M., Mühl, K., Kraus, J., Stoll, T., Baumann, M., Weber, M.: From car-driver-handovers to cooperative interfaces: visions for driver–vehicle interaction in automated driving. In: Automotive User Interfaces, pp. 273–294. Springer, Berlin (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49448-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

20. Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., de Winter, J.: Take-over again: investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Appl. Ergon.62, 204–215 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Clark, J., Stanton, N., Revell, K.: Handover assist trials in highly automated vehicles: participant recommendations for future design. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2018)

    Google Scholar 

22. Morgan, P., Alford, C., Parkhurst, G.: Handover issues in autonomous driving: a literature review. Project Report. University of the West of England, Bristol (2016).http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/29167

23. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Harris, D.: Driving automation: learning from aviation about design philosophies. Int. J. Veh. Des.45(3), 323–338 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Owsley, C., McGwin Jr., G.: Vision and driving. Vision Res.50(23), 2348–2361 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. De Winter, J.C.F., Eisma, Y.B., Cabrall, C.D.D., Hancock, P.A., Stanton, N.A.: Situation awareness based on eye movements in relation to the task environment. Cogn. Technol. Work 1–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

26. Brennan, S.E., Clark, H.H.: Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cogn.22(6), 1482–1493 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Coco, M.I., Dale, R., Keller, F.: Performance in a collaborative search task: the role of feed-back and alignment. Top. Cogn. Sci.10, 55–79 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Garrod, S., Anderson, A.: Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition27(2), 181–218 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Garrod, S., Pickering, M.J.: Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Top. Cogn. Sci.1(2), 1233–1248 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Clark, J., Stanton, N., Revell, K.: Handover assist in highly automated vehicles: how vocal communication guides visual attention. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 295–306. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

31. Stanton, N.A.: Response to: automated vehicles in Ingenia, article 62 (2015).https://www.ingenia.org.uk/Ingenia/Articles/44463494-cfd0-416a-b4a4-9e9e7b67df94. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

Download references