1. [A⁺88]_A. Albano et al. An overview of Sidereus: A graphical database schema editor for Galileo. InProc. EDBT’ 88, pages 567-571, Venice, Italy, March 1988.

   Google Scholar 

2. A. Albano, L. Cardelli, and R. Orsini. Galileo: A strongly typed, interactive conceptual language.ACM TODS, 10(2): 230–260, 1985.

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. R. Agrawal and N. H. Gehani. ODE (Object Database and Environment): The language and data model. InProceedings of the 1989 ACM SIGMOD Int’l Conference on Management of Data, pages 36-45, Portland, OR, May 1989. ACM.

   Google Scholar 

4. R. Agrawal, N. H. Gehani, and J. Srinivasan. OdeView: The graphical interface to Ode. In Hector Garcia-Molina and H. V. Jagadesh, editors,Proceedings of the 1990 ACM SIGMOD Int’l Conference on Management of Data, pages 34-43, Atlantic City, NJ, May 1990. ACM.

   Google Scholar 

5. S. Abiteboul and R. Hull. IFO: A formal semantic database model.ACM TODS, 12(4):525–565, 1987.

   Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

6. Paul J. Asente and Ralph R. Swick.X Window System Toolkit Digital Press, 1990.

   Google Scholar 

7. Daniel Bryce and Richard Hull. SNAP: A graphics-based schema manager. InProceedings of the Int’l Conference on Data Engineering, 1986.

   Google Scholar 

8. Ronald J. Brachman and Hector J. Levesque, editors.Readings in Knowledge Representation. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., Mountain View, CA, 1985.

   MATH  Google Scholar 

9. P. Butterworth, A. Otis, and J. Stein. The GemStone object database management system.Comm. of the ACM, 34(10):64–77, October 1991.

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. S. Chatterjee. Graphical image persistence and code generation for OOdini. Master’s thesis, NJIT, Newark, NJ, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

11. Peter Pin-Shan Chen. The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a unified view of data.ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1):9–36, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Jeff Conklin. Hypertext: An introduction and survey.Computer, 20(9): 17–41, September 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. R. G. G. Cattell and T. R. Rogers. Entity-Relationship database user interfaces. In Michael Stonebraker, editor,Readings in Database Systems, pages 359–368. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

14. Hungkway Chao and Veena Prakash Teli. Development of a university database using the Dual Model of object-oriented knowledge bases. Master’s thesis, NJIT, Newark, NJ, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

15. O. Deux et al. The story of O₂.IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2(1): 91–108, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. C. J. Date.An Introduction to Database Systems, volume 1. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, MA, fourth edition, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

17. Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe.Fundamentals of Database Systems. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., New York, NY, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

18. D. Fischer et al. VML — The Vodak Data Modeling Language. Technical report, GMD-IPSI, December 1989.

    Google Scholar 

19. D. H. Fishman et al. Overview of the Iris DBMS. In Won Kim and Frederick H. Lochovsky, editors,Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases, and Applications, pages 219–250. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

20. Kevin Gorman and Joobin Choobineh. The Object-Oriented Entity-Relationship Model (OOERM).Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3): 41–65, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

21. J. Geller. Propositional representation for graphical knowledge.Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 34(1):97–131, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. J. Geller, Y. Perl, P. Cannata, and A. Sheth. Structural integration using the object-oriented Dual Model. Research Report CIS-91-01, NJIT, 1991. submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

23. J. Geller, Y. Perl, and E. Neuhold. Structural schema integration in heterogeneous multi-database systems using the Dual Model. InProc. of the First Int’l Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems, pages 200-203, Los Alamitos, CA, 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

24. Marc Gyssens, Jan Paredaens, and Dirk van Gucht. A graph-oriented object model for database end-user interfaces. In Hector Garcia-Molina and H. V. Jagadesh, editors,Proceedings of the 1990 ACM SIGMOD Int’l Conference on Management of Data, pages 24-33, Atlantic City, NJ, May 1990. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

25. J. Geller and S. Shapiro. Graphical deep knowledge for intelligent machine drafting. InTenth Int’l Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Mateo, CA, 1987. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

26. W. Horak and G. Krönert. An object-oriented office document architecture model for processing and interchange of documents. InSecond ACM-SIGOA Conference on Office Information Systems, pages 152-160, Toronto, Canada, June 1984.

    Google Scholar 

27. IEEE Computer Society.Proc. of Second Int’l Conference on Data and Knowledge Systems for Manufacturing and Engineering, Gaithersburg, MD, October 1989.

    Google Scholar 

28. Won Kim. A model of queries for object-oriented databases. InProceedings of the 15th Int’l Conference on Very Large Databases, pages 423-432, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

29. Gerti Kappel and Michael Schrefl. Object/Behavior diagrams. InProceedings of the 7th Int’l Conference on Data Engineering, pages 530-539, Kobe, Japan, April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

30. Brad A. Myers et al. Garnet, comprehensize support for graphical, highly interactive user interfaces.Computer, 23(11):71–85, November 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Bertrand Meyer. Tools for the new culture: Lessons from the design of the Eiffel libraries.Comm. of the ACM, 33(9):68–88, September 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Bonnie K. MacKellar and Joan Peckham. Representing design objects in SORAC: A data model with semantic objects, relationships and constraints. InSecond International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

33. E. Neuhold, Y. Perl, J. Geller, and V. Turau. Separating structural and semantic elements in object-oriented knowledge bases. InProc. of the Advanced Database System Symposium, pages 67-74, Kyoto, Japan, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

34. E. J. Neuhold and M. Schrefl. Dynamic derivation of personalized views. InProceedings of the 14th Int’l Conference on Very Large Databases, Long Beach, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

35. Ontologic, Inc., Burlington, MA. ONTOS 2.01 documentation, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

36. Open Software Foundation.OSF/Motif Programmer’s Guide. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

37. Open Software Foundation.OSF/Motif Style Guide. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

38. [RBP⁺91]_James Rumbaugh, Michael Blaha, William Premerlani, Frederick Eddy, and William Lorensen.Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

39. Elaine Rich and Kevin Knight.Artificial Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, second edition, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

40. Lawrence A. Rowe and Michael Stonebraker. The design of POSTGRES. InProceedings of the 1986 ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, Washington, D.C., May 1986.

    Google Scholar 

41. Michael Stonebraker et al. Third-generation database system manifesto.SIGMOD Record, 19(3):31–44, September 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

42. Robert W. Scheifler and Jim Gettys. The X window system.ACM Trans. on Graphics, 5(2):79–109, April 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. David W. Shipman. The Functional Data Model and the data language DAPLEX. In Michael Stonebraker, editor,Readings in Database Systems, pages 388–404. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

44. M. Schrefl and E. J. Neuhold. A knowledge-based approach to overcome structural differences in object-oriented database integration. InProceedings of the IFIP Working Conference on the Role of AI in Database and Information Systems, Guangzhou, China, 1988. North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

45. M. Schrefl and E. J. Neuhold. Object class definition by generalization using upward inheritance. InProceedings of the 4th Int’l Conference on Data Engineering, pages 4-13, Los Angeles, CA, February 1988.

    Google Scholar 

46. J. F. Sowa.Conceptual Structures, Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, MA, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

47. J. F. Sowa.Principles of Semantic Networks. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., Mountain View, CA, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

48. Jeffrey D. Ullman.Principles of Database Systems. Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD, second edition, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

49. Peter Wegner. An object-oriented classification paradigm. In Schiver and Wegner, editors,Research Directions in Object-Oriented Programming. MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

50. Douglas A. Young.The X Window System, Programming and Applications with Xt. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, OSF/Motif edition, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references