• Anderson, R. C. (2018). Mate copying and the effects of sexual history on romantic desirability.Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0143-y.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, R. C., & Surbey, M. K. (2014). I want what she’s having: Evidence for human mate copying.Human Nature, 25, 342–358.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9202-7.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, R. C., & Surbey, M. K. (2018). Human mate copying as a form of nonindependent mate selection: Findings and considerations.Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14, 173–196.https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000151.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bowers, R. I., Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2011). Generalization in mate-choice copying in humans.Behavioral Ecology, 23, 112–124.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr164.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment.Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice.Biological Reviews, 78, 575–595.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006158.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Chu, S. (2012). I like who you like, but only if I like you: Female character affects matechoice copying.Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 691–695.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.029.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Collins, T. J., & Gillath, O. (2012). Attachment, breakup strategies, and associated outcomes: The effects of security enhancement on the selection of breakup strategies.Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 210–222.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rp.2012.01.008.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De La Croix, D., & Mariani, F. (2015). From polygyny to serial monogamy: A unified theory of marriage institutions.Review of Economic Studies, 82, 565–607.https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv001.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinised male faces.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2405–2410.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.2184.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• DeGue, S., DiLillo, D., & Scalora, M. (2010). Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and treatment, 22, 402–426.https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210372140.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Deng, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2015). Mate-choice copying in single and coupled women: The influence of mate acceptance and mate rejection decisions of other women.Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 89–105.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300106.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Doering, J. (2010). Face, accounts, and schemes in the context of relationship breakups.Symbolic Interaction, 33, 71–95.https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2010.33.1.71.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Duffey, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2014). Developmental relational counseling: Applications for counseling men.Journal of Counseling & Development, 92, 104–113.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00136.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dunn, M. J., & Dorian, M. V. (2010). Simulated attraction increases opposite sex attractiveness ratings in females but not males.Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4(1), 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099305.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fagundes, C. P. (2012). Getting over you: Contributions of attachment theory for postbreakup emotional adjustment.Personal Relationships, 19, 37–50.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01336.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2010). Breakup distress and loss of intimacy in university students.Psychology, 1, 173–177.https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2010.13023.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Geary, D. C. (2006). Sexual selection and the evolution of human sex differences.Psychological Topics, 15, 203–238.

• Gouda-Vossos, A., Nakagawa, S., Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). Mate choice copying in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 4(4), 364–386.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-018-0099-y.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grazian, D. (2011). The girl hunt: Urban nightlife and the performance of masculinity as a collective activity.Symbolic Interaction, 30, 221–243.https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2007.30.2.221.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Shebliske, L. J., & Lundgren, S. R. (1993). Social influence, sex differences, and judgements of beauty: Putting the interpersonal back into interpersonal attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 522–531.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.522.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 635–647.https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207313728.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hunt, J., Bussière, L. F., Jennions, M. D., & Brooks, R. (2004). What is genetic quality?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 329–333.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.035.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences among humans.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1611), 899–903.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0205.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kirkpatrick, M. (1982). Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice.Evolution, 36, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0205.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lewandowski, G. W., Aron, A., & Gee, J. (2007). Personality goes a long way: The malleability of opposite-sex physical attractiveness.Personal Relationships, 14, 571–585.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00172.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J. O., Valentine, K. A., Jiang, Y. F., & Balliet, D. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757–776.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033777.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 193–208.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9151-2.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2008). Social influence in human face preference: Men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions.Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 140–146.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.11.007.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2011). Social learning and human mate preferences: A potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366(1563), 366–375.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0192.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data.Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Molleman, L., & Gächter, S. (2018). Societal background influences social learning in cooperative decision making.Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 547–555.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.05.007.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nordell, S. E., & Valone, T. J. (1998). Mate choice copying as public information.Ecology Letters, 1(2), 74–76.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.1998.00025.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Norona, J. C., Olmstead, S. B., & Welsh, D. P. (2017). Breaking up in emerging adulthood: A developmental perspective of relationship dissolution.Emerging Adulthood, 5, 116–127.https://doi.org/10.1172/2167696816658585.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Breaking up romantic relationships: Costs experiences and coping strategies deployed.Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 164–181.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470490800600119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices.Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 320–325.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.001.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., & Gallup, G. G. (2001). The reproductive priming effect.Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29, 245–248.https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.3.245.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: Do females copy each other?The American Naturalist, 140, 1000–1009.https://doi.org/10.1086/285452.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Reynolds, J. D., & Gross, M. R. (1990). Costs and benefits of female mate choice: Is there a lek paradox?The American Naturalist, 136, 230–243.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rodeheffer, C. D., Leyva, R. P. P., & Hill, S. E. (2016). Attractive female romantic partners provide a proxy for unobservable male qualities: The when and why behind human female mate choice copying. Evolutionary Psychology, April–June, 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916652144

• Rosin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schaller, M. (2011). The behavioural immune system and the psychology of human sociality.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 366, 3418–3426.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0029.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.894.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences.Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458.https://doi.org/10.1016/p.paid.2005.01.023.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sprecher, S., Zimmerman, C., & Abrahams, E. M. (2010). Choosing compassionate strategies to end a relationship: Effects of compassionate love for partner and the reason for the breakup.Social Psychology, 41, 66–75.https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000010.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stanik, C. E. (2009).Romantic relationships: An examination of partner evaluation, women’s mate preferences, and dynamics in long-term relationships (unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Michigan, United States. Retrieved fromhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/63867/cstanik_1.pdf?sequ ence=1&isAllowed=y.

• Stewart, J. G., & Harkness, K. L. (2015). The interpersonal toxicity of excessive reassurance-seeking: Evidence from a longitudinal study of romantic relationships.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 392–401.https://doi.org/10.1521/jspc.2015.34.5.392.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Street, S. E., Morgan, T. J. H., Thornton, A., Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Cross, C. P. (2018). Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning.Scientific Reports, 8(1715), 1715.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (2010). The intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization.Psychological Review, 117, 601–622.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018936.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Uller, T., & Johansson, C. (2003). Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect: Are married men more attractive?Human Nature, 14(3), 267–276.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1006-0.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Vakiritzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2009). Mate choice copying and mate quality bias: Different processes, different species.Behavioral Ecology, 20, 908–911.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp073.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vakiritzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2012). Do women really like taken men? Results from a large questionnaire study.Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(1), 50–65.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099225.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vakirtzis, A., & Roberts, S. C. (2010). Mate quality bias: Sex differences in humans.Annales Zoologici Fennici, 47, 149–157.https://doi.org/10.5735/086.047.0208.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vakritzis, A. (2011). Mate choice copying and nonindependent mate choice: A critical review.Annales Zoologici Fennici, 48, 91–107.https://doi.org/10.5735/086.048.0202.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Straaten, I., Engels, R. C. M. E., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, R. W. (2008). Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioural mimicry: A seminaturalistic experiment.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 902–911.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9179-y.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wade, M. J., & Pruett-Jones, S. G. (1990). Female copying increases the variance in male mating success.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 5749–5753.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.15.5749.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans.Human Nature, 18, 264–271.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9004-2.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references