Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

1. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13(1):3–9.

   Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

2. Schulze MB, Hu FB. Dietary patterns and risk of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and coronary heart disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2002;4(6):462–7.

   Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

3. Bush M, Kirkpatrick S. Setting dietary guidance: the Canadian experience. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(12 Suppl 2):S22–7.

   Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

4. Krebs-Smith SM, Kris-Etherton P. How does MyPyramid compare to other population-based recommendations for controlling chronic disease? J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(5):830–7.

   Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

5. Bush MA, Martineau C, Pronk JA, et al. Eating well with Canada’s food guide: “a tool for the times”. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2007;68(2):92–6.

   Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

6. McCullough ML, Willett WC. Evaluating adherence to recommended diets in adults: the Alternate Healthy Eating Index. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(1A):152–7.

   Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

7. Fung TT, Pan A, Hou T, et al. Long-term change in diet quality is associated with body weight change in men and women. J Nutr. 2015;145(8):1850–6.

   Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

8. Garriguet D, Nutrition: findings from the Canadian Community Health Survey—overview of Canadians’ eating habits (2004), Statistics Canada. 2006, Ministry of Industry: Ottawa, ON. p. 1–47.

9. Health Canada, Food and Drugs Act., 2003: Ottawa, ON.

10. Food and Drug Administration, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21—Food and drugs, part 101—Food labeling, Department of Health and Human Services. 2008: Silver Spring, MD

11. The European Parliament and the Council, Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, 2006.

12. CFDR TNT. (2013); Available from:http://www.cfdr.ca/Sharing/Tracking-Nutrition-Trends-(TNT).aspx.

13. Cowburn G, Stockley L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(1):21–8.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

14. Patterson RE, Satia JA, Kristal AR, et al. Is there a consumer backlash against the diet and health message? J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101(1):37–41.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

15. Werle COC, Cuny C. The boomerang effect of mandatory sanitary messages to prevent obesity. Mark Lett. 2012;23(3):883–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Contento IR, in Nutrition education: linking research, theory, and practice. 2011, Jones &Bartlett Publishers (chapter 2). p. 444.

17. Oakes ME, Slotterback CS. Judgements of food healthfulness: food name stereotypes in adults over age 25. Appetite. 2001;37(1):1–8.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

18. Carels RA, Konrad K, Harper J. Individual differences in food perceptions and calorie estimation: an examination of dieting status, weight, and gender. Appetite. 2007;49(2):450–8.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

19. Carels RA, Harper J, Konrad K. Qualitative perceptions and caloric estimations of healthy and unhealthy foods by behavioral weight loss participants. Appetite. 2006;46(2):199–206.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

20. Chandon P, Wansink B. The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. J Consum Res. 2007;34(3):301–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Provencher V, Polivy J, Herman CP. Perceived healthiness of food. If it’s healthy, you can eat more! Appetite. 2009;52(2):340–4.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

22. Spence M, Livingstone MB, Hollywood LE, et al. A qualitative study of psychological, social and behavioral barriers to appropriate food portion size control. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:92.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

23. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

24. Nisbett R, Ross L. Human inference: strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

25. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47(2):263–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Herman CP, Polivy J. Normative influences on food intake. Physiol Behav. 2005;86(5):762–72.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Herman CP, Polivy J. Norm-violation, norm-adherence, and overeating. Coll Antropol. 2007;31(1):55–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

28. Herman CP, Polivy J. Restrained eating. In: Stunkard A, editor. Obesity. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1980. p. 208–25.

    Google Scholar 

29. Chandon P, Wansink B. Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(10):571–93.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30. Oakes ME. Stereotypical thinking about foods and perceived capacity to promote weight gain. Appetite. 2005;44(3):317–24.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

31. Oakes ME. Filling yet fattening: stereotypical beliefs about the weight gain potential and satiation of foods. Appetite. 2006;46(2):224–33.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

32. Chernev A, Gal D. Categorization effects in value judgments: averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. J Mark Res. 2010;47(4):738–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Chernev A. The dieter’s paradox. J Consum Psychol. 2011;21(2):178–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Forwood SE, Ahern A, Hollands GJ, et al. Underestimating calorie content when healthy foods are present: an averaging effect or a reference-dependent anchoring effect? PLoS One. 2013;8(8), e71475.This manuscript suggests that the negative calorie illusion is based on the use of a reference food to estimate calorie content of the tested food.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

35. Sutterlin B, Siegrist M. Simply adding the word “fruit” makes sugar healthier: the misleading effect of symbolic information on the perceived healthiness of food. Appetite. 2015;95:252–61.This manuscript suggests that symbolic information on product labels, such as the name of an ingredient that symbolizes healthiness, can influence the perceived healthiness of food.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

36. Bell EA, Rolls BJ. Energy density of foods affects energy intake across multiple levels of fat content in lean and obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(6):1010–8.

    CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

37. Cavanagh KV, Kruja B, Forestell CA. The effect of brand and caloric information on flavor perception and food consumption in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Appetite. 2014;82:1–7.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

38. Cavanagh KV, Forestell CA. The effect of brand names on flavor perception and consumption in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Food Qual Prefer. 2013;28(2):505–9.This manuscript highlights the influence of brand information (i.e., healthy vs. unhealthy) on food sensory perception and intake and shows that restrained eaters are more influenced by brand names perceived as healthy.

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Gravel K, Doucet E, Herman CP, et al. “Healthy,” “diet,” or “hedonic”. How nutrition claims affect food-related perceptions and intake? Appetite. 2012;59(3):877–84.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

40. Carbonneau E, Perron J, Drapeau V, et al. Impact of nutritional labelling on 10-d energy intake, appetite perceptions and attitudes towards food. Br J Nutr, 2015: p. 1–10.

41. Wansink B, Chandon P. Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? J Mark Res. 2006;43(4):605–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

42. Schuldt JP, Hannahan M. When good deeds leave a bad taste. Negative inferences from ethical food claims. Appetite. 2013;62:76–83.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

43. Girz L, Polivy J, Herman CP, et al. The effects of calorie information on food selection and intake. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(10):1340–5.This manuscript examines the effect of calorie information (i.e., low vs. high in calories) on food choices (i.e., healthy vs. less healthy) and intake and shows that calorie labels have significant impact on food choices among restrained eaters.

    Article CAS  Google Scholar 

44. Hodgkins CE, Raats MM, Fife-Schaw C, et al. Guiding healthier food choice: systematic comparison of four front-of-pack labelling systems and their effect on judgements of product healthiness. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(10):1652–63.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

45. Kroese FM, Evers C, de Ridder DT. If it’s good it must be bad: the indirect effect of temptation strength on self-control through perceived unhealthiness. Eat Behav. 2013;14(4):522–4.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

46. Polivy J, Herman CP. Mental health and eating behaviours: a bi-directional relation. Can J Public Health. 2005;96 Suppl 3:S43–6. S9-53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

47. Cohen DA, Babey SH. Contextual influences on eating behaviours: heuristic processing and dietary choices. Obes Rev. 2012;13(9):766–79.

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48. Gravel K, Deslauriers A, Watiez M, et al. Sensory-based nutrition pilot intervention for women. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(1):99–106.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

49. Cohen D, Farley TA. Eating as an automatic behavior. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5(1):A23.

    PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

50. Doucet E, Cameron J. Appetite control after weight loss: what is the role of bloodborne peptides? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32(3):523–32.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

51. Buckland NJ, Finlayson G, Hetherington MM. Pre-exposure to diet-congruent food reduces energy intake in restrained dieting women. Eat Behav. 2013;14(3):249–54.

    Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references